I've linked a 5 minute interview by Lou Dobbs of Russ Ramsland, from the Allied Security Operations Group. Ramsland has been digging into the issue of election fraud--computerized fraud--for several years. He began his research--as I understand it--following the 2018 midterm elections in Texas and Kentucky and has since expanded to other states.
In the video below Ramsland discusses the situation in Michigan. He points out that to do a correct analysis you need to know exactly what version of the machines were used in any given precinct, because different version of the machines have different characteristics and capabilities. He obtained the serial numbers for the machines that were used in Michigan, then focused on four counties. Those counties had voter turnout that appeared to be prima facie impossible and also saw very large spikes in votes--mostly for Biden. According to Ramsland these spikes are "physically impossible", because the machines in use were not capable of processing the given number of votes in the time period indicated.
If true, this should obviously prove to be a very significant finding. Ramsland estimates that the number of votes involved is between 225K and 400K. That's important, because courts will not generally look at such anomalies unless the numbers involved could lead to reversing the outcome of the election. These numbers, even at the low end, are well past that threshhold.
Ramsland also stated that his team has been concentrating on Michigan but is now "turning our sights" on Georgia.
What I find so fascinating about this interview is that it shows how forensic data analysis can build a pretty convincing case for fraud, one that goes beyond statistical analysis alone. I'm not knocking statistical analysis. However, to be able to tell a court--We targeted what appeared to be statistical anomalies in four counties in Michigan, and subsequent analysis confirmed that those anomalies were actually physically impossible--builds a strong basis for arguing that similar statistical anomalies in other states should be presumed to, at a minimum, require closer examination. If not a presumption of fraud.
For me, this is another picture of seemingly hard evidence of fraud, but Dobbs does not provide us with any information about how we get from this expert to a scenario where the Michigan electors are changed from Biden to Trump. What is the avenue to attain electoral justice? Unless that link is made we have nothing more than another maddening chapter in a book on election fraud, published during a Biden administration.ReplyDelete
What a fantastic piece! No drama, just clinical information and facts. It's information/links like this that give me a sense of hope ... that we really may have a chance to prevail. Thank you so much for linking this. Best always.ReplyDelete
When the US State Dept. monitors an election in foreign countries one of the "tells" they watch for is a statistical anomaly. The 2020 Election has many of these! Funny how the Lying Media can't identify these right here in the good old USA!ReplyDelete
Given what we have learned so far with the voting machines and software being susceptible to manipulation and the suspect timing of a pause in vote counting in different states at about the same time on election night, it looks like a criminal conspiracy.ReplyDelete
Ran across this brief video from Symantec demonstrating how easy it is to “hack” these machines. I use scare quotes because some of these vulnerabilities may be features not bugs. Anyway, count the number of times the guy uses “disturbing” in reaction to what Symantec discovered about these machines.ReplyDelete
Okay, this is redundant, but I somehow missed that voting machine vulnerabilities was a hot topic back in 2017! Here’s CNN doing the Lord’s work. These videos should be spread far and wide on twitter and facebook.Delete
Our current President is a numbers genius, as well as the "Left" uses the mental manipulation of "projections" blaming you for what they are attempting - and for years with our "&hitty" education system, getting away with.ReplyDelete
Am I the only one wondering obsessively about what is going on "behind the scenes" All these hints and allegations, statistical and otherwise, the historical moment seems so pregnant but then you realize that it just "seems" that way because of the "access to information" we are all afforded by our digital age, good information, bad information, misinformation, regardless it is information that in former times we would hardly any of us be conscious of at all. So here I am, Joe Citizen, speculating on what the President of the United States is doing, what deals he is making in which back rooms to effect a solution to our present dilemmas. Election Fraud, rogue Intelligence Community, Treason, Corrupt DOJ, Criminal Political parties, Global Elite hijacking of National Sovereignty, corrupt and coopted media, Corrupt Pol getting set to be sworn in as POTUS. Confront any of it forthrightly and what happens to society -- civil war, citizens taking up sides? nothing? I like to think that Trump is sitting down at some table somewhere with Mitch and Obama and Clinton on the other side and he's negotiating in some kind of realpolitik currency where each side has certain leverage, and he's working out a Deal . Everybody gives a little everybody gets a little. Maybe Trump gets another 4 years, and Durham is dropped and Haspel gets to stay at CIA, or maybe they let Biden assume the Presidency and Trump is left alone to form a new political party and nobody gets indicted and the repubs are cut out. Or maybe in exchange for nobody gets indicted by Durham the election fraud is exposed and reformed and no riots. I don't know. Just wish I didn't suffer from the illusion that its at all possible for me to know.ReplyDelete
"I like to think that Trump is sitting down at some table somewhere with Mitch and Obama and Clinton on the other side and he's negotiating in some kind of realpolitik currency where each side has certain leverage, and he's working out a Deal . Everybody gives a little everybody gets a little"Delete
Perish. The. Thought. That's banana republic procedure. That's the epitome of plutocracy.
The CIA is the most powerful and dangerous element within the deep state. At a minimum their role in the fraud must be covered up as a price for allowing anything to go forward. I wish it weren't so, but that is the reality.Delete
"physically impossible", because the machines in use were not capable of processing the given number of votes in the time period indicated.
I bet it could be done with a thumb drive.
Gee, this leads us right back to the thumb drive that was inserted into one of the vote tabulation machines/computers. Seems the thumb drive that was misplaced was inserted by someone who walked away to help avoid being notice, came back and could not immediately find it; probably because someone else removed it before she got back to the computer.
When I first heard the "physically impossible" claim, I cringed and knew that is likely the result of a dump via thumb drive. I am really shocked in the brazen disregard of basic cyber security for our countries most important election.Delete
Can someone explain to me at what point does the burden of proof shift to the Democrats?ReplyDelete
Without reciting the vast evidence discovered, there is plenty of evidence of election/vote fraud.
A blanket denial by the Democrat officials involved in the fraud is no denial at all. They control the ballots, the machines, the software, denied the GOP observers any real means the counting, etc.
A judge simply dismissing the cases, so far, don't even address the facts. The one judge dismissed a case in spite of hundreds of pages of affidavits based on a finding that he trusts a former Democrat election official who may or may not have been at the counting location.
Every bit of evidence helps the public case for voiding the fraudulent election numbers.Delete
The final decision on accepting or rejecting the election numbers is a political decision by the state legislatures. Public outrage influences that final decision.
Video from 2006 ... “Hacking Democracy” about Bush v Gore election issues ...ReplyDelete
Votes for Gore being subtracted, only vote changed for president while other votes on the ballot, missing memory cards, etc
Same assertions as with this latest election.
Oh, blackboxvoting.org started by the Seattle lady in the documentary has been very silent about Trump for 4 years. Matter of fact, the site has pretty much gone dark starting a few years ago.Delete
But Bev Harris of the video appears to fight on in Twitter ...Delete
Kentucky election was 2019. Here's a short extract from Ramsland describing the apparent vote switching seen live on CNN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJWxNQAbtpkReplyDelete
Alright ... one more time ... sorry Mark, I am finding more stuff ...ReplyDelete
Here’s Bev Harris recently...
“ Although many will say Trump is sort of a flawed model to put forth the message, I think it’s very important that he’s bringing this to the fore,” she says by phone on Thursday.”
“ But what Harris is arguing is that if you were concerned about computerized voting during the Bush years, then you should still be concerned about it today. “It’s not a left/right issue at all … It’s not about the candidates anymore,” Harris says.”
The article goes on about her discovery of fractional voting as of it voodoo, but it’s a real feature of Dominion and the systems she investigated.
“ Frankly, although the media kind of sat on [Trump] pretty hard for saying he wouldn’t necessarily accept the results, it is ridiculous to say that a candidate or the public has to accept votes it can never verify,” she says. “We absolutely have the right to verify the count and to verify the results we are told are true.”
Oh, contrary to the article, any system networked using TCPIP is vulnerable. The encryption must be extremely secure and there is nothing revealed to date the systems used were in any sense of the word except superficially.
I have worked in secure and non-secure systems in the US Navy. Secure systems did not have USB ports or at least the ones I worked in on the S. Korean war games did not. Hello Hillary’s emails, but I digress.
"it is ridiculous to say that a candidate or the public has to accept votes it can never verify,”Delete
Gosh, that seems to make sense!
"Secure systems did not have USB ports"