Pages

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

Trump Campaign Files Suit In Michigan

Here's the situation on the ground--obvious fraud:


BREAKING: Detroit Officials Are NOW BLOCKING GOP POLL WORKERS From Re-Entering TCF Center — POLICE CALLED


The police were called to keep GOP poll workers out.

In response:


Campaign Manager Bill Stepien issued a statement:

As votes in Michigan continue to be counted, the presidential race in the state remains extremely tight as we always knew it would be. President Trump’s campaign has not been provided with meaningful access to counting locations to observe the opening of ballots and the counting process, as guaranteed by Michigan law. We have filed suit in the Michigan Court of Claims to halt counting until meaningful access has been granted. We also demand to review those ballots which were counted while we did not have meaningful access. President Trump is committed to ensuring that all legal votes are counted in Michigan and everywhere else.


Michigan is where there was a ballot dump in the wee hours of the morning: over 100K, every single one for Biden. Coincidentally, Biden's lead is currently 41K.

MORE MICHIGAN NEWS:

John James (R) is currently leading in Michigan US Senate race (by more than 250k)

That should be another Senate flip.

More Funny Numbers: Michigan County Clerk Admits 'Skewed' Election Numbers In Very Red County Awarded to Biden

Antrim county went for Trump in 2016 by its usual margin for GOP candidates:

YearRepublicanDemocraticThird Parties
201662.0% 8,46932.6% 4,4485.5% 750

This year the numbers are reversed:



52 comments:

  1. “Decision Desk” just called Wisconsin for Biden, but STILL have NC and GA in the too-close to-call-column. We live under a regime, not a government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The call in Wisconsin seems appropriate to me. I don't see any obvious signs of voter fraud in my state, and the recount will happen as Trump has requested. I wish it went the other way, but in 2016 it was we who benefited from a slim win.

      I don't know NC or GA like I know my own state, but from an outsider's view, those should be called too. Why are they still trying to figure out how to count things this late? If my state, and many others, can count everything in a day (or be near 100% there), why can't other states do the same?

      Delete
    2. I've lived and worked in WI for a significant part of my life. My experience is that Cheeseheads have a touching but quite naive belief in the righteousness of their way of life that doesn't always square with reality.

      The Trump campaign isn't talking about "a slim win" or anything of that sort. There are clear indicators of fraud, which you can review on a separate thread.

      Delete
    3. This guy? Yeah, shocker.

      https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1323867671067299841

      Delete
    4. VP of Fox political content: Bill Sammon

      from twitter thread of the Last Refuge(SD):

      "The WaPo has an outline describing how Sammon runs the entire show at Fox regarding politics; and how he is the person who Chris Stirewalt [Megyn Kelly], Chris Wallace and Brett Baier directly report to for all issues, construction, and organization."

      https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1323876455357521920

      Frank

      Delete
  2. Taylor Marshall is delivering a strong rebuke to anyone tempted to despair over the situation (mea culpa). Calling for us to adopt the term #FakeElection (to go with #FakeNews and #FakeSocialMedia).

    https://youtu.be/Jh8fdjCUUXg

    ReplyDelete
  3. I nailed Florida, the rest of the country I wanna throw things at.

    Michigan and Wisconsin I am uncertain if will ever get a straight answer out of.

    NC and GA are just stalling... intentionally.

    Arizona will be a week sorting out it's ballot sharpie mess.

    Nevada is just pure evil, no reason, just because!

    ReplyDelete
  4. What uncorrupted office do we go to get our country back?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fox Decision Desk guru/pollster is really winging it. He doesn’t operate on facts. He starts with a basic vote number and then calls the rest based upon his polls and his gut and does so in such a way that he tries to cut off any argument… Arnon Mishkin. He made a judgment call that Republicans only voted at the polls and the mail-in ballots are all Dem votes. That tends to explain the illogical business of holding all mailins until after the in person votes have been counted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mishkin seems like he’d fit in nicely with Comey, Strzok, McCabe and all the rest of the bad guys…

      Delete
  6. This will be high stakes fighting- the bad guys want Barr and the investigations to go away really badly, and Trump wants to hold them accountable really badly. A little election fraud is nothing to them if it gets them a get out of jail free card. It's like a bank robber's not worried about running a red light during the getaway...not going to add any extra time or anything...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Imagine what must be behind all this. I expect the Russia Hoax is only a part, and maybe not the major part.

      Delete
    2. Imagine their rationalizing that Trump stole the last election from Hillary, so stealing this one from Trump is justice. That's exactly how these rabidly unethical and dishonest leftist scum think. Their "ends justifies the means" M.O. is already well established.

      Delete
    3. "maybe not the major part."
      You bet.
      With SparkleFarts' win in 2012, they thought they had a Permanent Majority all sewn up, and stopped at nothing to (stealthily) pillage *everything* w/ in reach.

      When DJT's Deplorables ambushed them, this was, not only a threat to their position, but to their self-image, as being smarter than mere Deplorables.
      This was an affront far more intolerable, than anything they had imagined they would ever have to endure.
      To hugely dangerous Injury, was added horribly excruciating Insult.

      Delete
  7. Things are extremely apparent when you take out the highly suspect vote totals in several states ...

    A lot of people do not care about Democrats running roughshod over the civil rights of Republicans (Trump for example) or fellow Democrats (Flynn for example).

    The same people do not care if Biden is a Chinese Manchurian candidate or if his family uses the US government to enrich themselves.

    This further confirms my other comments that we really are living in a post Constitutional society.

    Oh, and a lot of people have the memory of a nat.

    Suburban woman vote? Hello Temperance Movement. That begat the highly patriarchic ascendancy of the mafia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which did much, to begat the highly patriarchic ascendancy of the DS.

      Delete
    2. Gnat.

      Try to remember that.

      Delete
  8. I continue to be amazed and utterly dismayed by the disconnect between the huge number of Americans who bothered enough to vote and the majority of that huge number who didn't bother enough to figure out what they were voting for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "dismayed by the disconnect.... didn't bother enough to figure out what they were voting for."
      It didn't help, that Barr didn't do more, to make sure they knew key details of what they were voting for.
      Most people, most of the time, care far more about, say, pop music, than they do about truth in politics, unless their noses get rubbed into huge danger-signs.
      It was the job of Barr/ DJT, to do the utmost, to get those noses rubbed-in.
      Once Barr ducked this role, I must've expressed here, numerous times, my chagrin at that.

      Delete
    2. To this Barr/ Russia stuff, you can add the decision to keep Flynn from *loudly* going public.
      Thus, only well-read Righties had any real idea, of the scale of the injustice inflicted upon him.
      It's all an immeasurable tragedy.

      Delete
    3. The fact is, as a public official Barr could not speak out in the way you think he should have before investigations were completed.

      Delete
    4. But, some investigations had likely been completed, e.g. those described in the IG's 2019 mini-reports.
      I find it hard to believe, that some charges could've been bought, some serious enough to move the needle on public understanding of the stakes.

      Delete
    5. “Imagine what must be behind all this...”. “The fact is, as a public official
      Barr could not speak...”. Those comments capture an enormous disconnect in my view. We can only imagine because the facts were never shared when they could have made a difference and Barr could not speak. While we are losing the country we can all take some solace that we followed the old rules. Certainly when they come for the guy in the little house in the woods.

      Delete
  9. The wrong guy was winning. Can't have that. How will we ever inflict our socialist agenda on America if we keep losing national elections? Oh look, we just found a shoebox with 50,000 Biden votes in the trunk of a rental car! Hooray for democracy!

    ReplyDelete
  10. 11/11/18

    WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?
    1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?
    2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?
    3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?
    4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?
    Who safeguards 'blank' ballots?
    Who issues 'blank' ballots?
    Who controls 'blank' ballots?
    How many 'blank' ballots are generated vs. total county pop?
    THE CONTROL AND ISSUANCE OF BLANK BALLOTS IS KEY.
    Why did the same counties [under dispute today] REFUSE to turn over voter registration information upon request to the Voter Fraud Commission?
    Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and turned over to DHS?
    What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/without-evidence-trump-and-sessions-warn-of-voter-fraud-in-tuesdays-elections/2018/11/05/e9564788-e115-11e8-8f5f-a55347f48762_story.html?utm_term=.db84f6960764📁
    Enemy @ the Front Door.
    Q

    https://qanon.pub/?q=ballots

    ReplyDelete
  11. As they say "all politics is local". I'm going to take that adage literally and skip all the drama of National Elections. From my little house in the woods we have little interaction with Reps, Sens and Pres. types of folks. What about anti-gun laws? If something is passed that I can't abide, all I can say is come and take it.

    What a disappointing turn this nation has taken. The optimism is finally burnt out of me. With sadness it's all hands for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're dreaming if you think they won't come for you in your little house in the woods.

      Delete
    2. Not dreaming, it will be a hell of a fight.

      Delete
    3. @Mark
      @LB&FM

      I get it, and don't disagree that they'll find me, too, eventually, in my little house in the woods.

      But until then I'm kind of inclined to agree with LB&FM that a little time out might be a healthy thing...to recharge the batteries, regain some perspective, recalibrate my priorities...and see how I can add value (in the broadest sense) going forward.

      Obviously, I won't be applying for a job in the Harris Administration.

      Delete
  12. Swag....

    With Trumps history he will force a huge focus on ballot integrity.

    4 years ago Trump could not get the political support he needed in the era of Paul Ryan.

    Trump is not going to act like Nixon did to Kennedy in 1960. He will fight, for he has everything to lose. The Resistance if Biden wins, will attempt payback against Trump, his family, business, and supporters.

    Two interesting questions are:

    What if Trump wins? My prayers are he will.

    And if he loses? I see him acting like Samson in the temple.

    A legacy of this second attempted coup, no matter which side wins, will be a lot of very embittered Trump supporters, especially against quislings (people and institutions they feel betrayed them).

    The damage the Resistance is doing to their reputation is huge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The damage the Resistance is doing to their reputation is irrelevant to them.
      Anyone who doesn't slobber all over their every move will be sent to a gulag, or outright liquidated.
      As per their hero, Chairman Mao.

      Delete
  13. "You're dreaming if you think they won't come for you", esp. since your presence on the web tells them of your whereabouts.

    ReplyDelete
  14. >Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and
    >turned over to DHS?

    1. Trump had to focus on surviving Mueller.

    2. Paul Ryan and ilk, were against rocking the boat. See Aswan Brothers.

    3. There was not enough political support about voter fraud at the time in the general electorate. Most voters thought huge ballot fraud happened in other countries, not the US.

    4. The GOP election consent order had just been lifted. That history guided the GOP response.

    5. GOP had a history of not fighting, but allowing the Democrats to win.

    6. GOP Fear of being labeled racist.

    7. Trump haters were still a huge force in the GOP hierarchy. I’m still in shock Michael Steele, ex GOP chairman, came out for Biden. Plus McCain, etc. So many wanted to destroy Trump.

    8. Trump focused on what he perceived gave him the highest ROI with voters.

    Clinton’s motor voter registration could have been improved by the GOP house under Ryan, unfortunately he had other priorities...

    Due to ballot harvesting last election, my Representative Candidate had her seat stolen from her.

    It’s amazing the corruption Trump has unmasked in our system of government. I had no idea it was this bad. And now a Presidential Election may be stolen. Amazing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ray,

      First I agree with everything your saying.

      To add, when you say "I had no idea it was this bad". I don't think most have even found the tip of the iceberg yet.

      It's unfortunate, it frustrating and often times infuriating. We desperately need to take our country back from our government (s) and again make it for ourselves.

      I encourage everyone to read the declaration of independence. It's long, but it's a beautiful letter that needs a V2.0.

      Delete
    2. "We desperately need to take our country back from our government"

      How are we going to do that when so many can't even form the contraction of "you are"?

      Delete
    3. Some of us read for meaning and give the others a break when it comes to typos, spelling and grammatical errors...

      Delete
    4. I do too.

      But then there's only so much I can endure.

      Delete
  15. Over 100k votes dumped in Michigan and not one vote for Trump? Fraud on its face.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's what I was just saying on the latest thread. I wonder whether the Trump campaign could demand that all ballots be sequestered. There has to be a way to deal with that blatant situation.

      Delete
    2. https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1324196229732028416

      https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1324207634887692290

      https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1324196957963825152

      Delete
  16. In the aftermath of the 2016 election Dems seriously entertained the idea that Donald Trump had colluded with Russia to interfere in and, as a result, win the election and many argued that the result should be overturned. Nate Silver's 538 commissioned a poli sci professor to address the question of whether a Presidential election can be invalidated. Here's what she came up with: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-happens-if-the-election-was-a-fraud-the-constitution-doesnt-say/.

    I'm not suggesting the article correctly analyzes the issues. I am certainly no expert in election law. But it does serve to address and discuss many of the unknowns that will have to be confronted if substantial evidence of election fraud is uncovered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Right now I'll take any knowledge about election law and its constitutional basis that I can get. I see Giuliani is talking multiple lawsuits, so they realize how big a problem they're facing, multiple states. Looks like this was a fairly coordinated strategy.

      Delete
    2. Thanks again. I've read it. It raises troubling issues in a number of areas that the author may not have recognized.

      I haven't read the 1971 case, but it seems to point in the general direction that I argued--which would favor the SCOTUS getting involved in the PA case. Roberts' decision seems to me indefensible and reckless, and now I believe 5 justices will see it that way, too.

      The Memphis law prof makes sense--it may require a high standard, but a redo of a presidential election in individual states based on fraud seems reasonable under the constitution. Obviously the level of proof will depend on circs, but statistical evidence would appear to be admissible, especially if supported by other evidence.

      Delete
    3. Monica Showalter (American Thinker) on a North Carolina precedent for election do-over:

      https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/recount_a_judicially_ordered_redone_election_is_far_better.html

      Delete
    4. Yes. That may be the way to go, depending on the inauguration date, etc. Uncharted waters there. Can a presidential term be extended? Or would Pelosi step in? Quick action needed. This is a coordinated attack on the election and constitutional order through the Dem controlled states.

      Delete
    5. Yeah. Many many questions. Many questions of first impression.

      The bad news is that this is where the Constitution's prescribed Presidential electoral provisions (with much left unsaid) intersect with procedural and substantive due process rights and fundamental fairness.

      The good news (hopefully) is that this is why we have courts and, ultimately, a Supreme Court.

      I suspect Trump is absolutely right that the issues raised by the numerous election irregularities which are surfacing will end up in the Supreme Court.

      Delete
  17. BREAKING: Michigan @USPS Whistleblower Details Directive From Superiors: Back-Date Late Mail-In-Ballots As Received November 3rd, 2020 So They Are Accepted

    “Separate them from standard letter mail so they can hand stamp them with YESTERDAY'S DATE & put them through"

    https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1324174186366074880

    ReplyDelete
  18. https://twitter.com/AndySwan/status/1324356783020920833

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An inspiration to us all! Even if he couldn't be with the rest of us.

      Delete