Already. Really. This is the plan. You work for the Oligarchy. Learn to luv Big Brother:
On ABC, Rahm Emanuel literally says a Biden White House should tell people laid off from retail stores like JC Penney to learn to code.
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 7, 2020
He actually said this. Amazing. pic.twitter.com/xlSnVi7445
David Goldman approaches it from a different angle but it all amounts to the same: Big Tech Is 'Policing' You, Says Jeff Bezos' Washington Post. I guess we knew that, right? But they're saying it right up front now. Already. Really. And they mean it:
“Trump’s Early Victory Declarations Test Tech Giant’s Mettle in Policing Threats to the Election.”
No joke — that was the Washington Post’s headline two days ago. I won’t pay Jeff Bezos to read the article, but the headline is astonishing. Big Brother in Silicon Valley is responsible for “policing” the election.
“Big Brother is Watching You” was the meme of George Orwell’s 1984. Today it’s “Big Tech is Policing You.”
And this:
What’s coming next, I have on high authority, is the suppression of “offensive” content on the Internet itself: Google searches won’t turn up content that you aren’t supposed to see.
Cuomo said similar about coding, months ago.
ReplyDelete-->Google searches won’t turn up content that you aren’t supposed to see.<--
ReplyDeleteLong been happening. Now they're just admitting it.
Here's free access to the wapo article
ReplyDeletehttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-e2-80-99s-early-victory-declarations-test-tech-giants-e2-80-99-mettle-in-policing-threats-to-the-election/ar-BB1aFeNx
It worked for me...
Who knew they're the police now? Well, they're telling us.
ReplyDeleteWhen I went to read a tweet earlier today, I was first directed to their warning about false information, then had to click to be directed to the tweet. The warning remained appended above the tweet.
DeleteWell the social media monarchs were certainly the self-appointed election authority and, at least according to The New York Times, the media decides the winner.
DeleteWe are witnessing a domestic “color revolution.” Comparing Election 2020 to US-sponsored coups:
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/ArI3pRTWOx4
Barry's first fixer?
ReplyDelete"On ABC, Rahm Emanuel literally says a Biden White House should tell people laid off from retail stores like JC Penney to learn to code."
ReplyDeleteBy all means retrain people in a skill that literally has no future. It's like telling buggy whip makers not to worry. We'll re-train you as ox yoke carvers.
Tom S.
Whatever menial task it may be, he doesn't care. He knows he won't be doing it.
DeleteIndeed! Five-year plans are for the proletariat, not the planners.
DeleteTom S.
Learn not, how to code, but how to make/ build/ fix things, and how to tell real wealth (e.g. gold coins) from pseudo wealth, e.g. financial instruments dependent for their value, upon complex bureaucratic/ technological systems.
DeleteSuch houses of cards can be hacked from "your" account, by some Snowflake on the other side of the country, or of the world.
Or, they can be Expropriated by a tyrannical gov't, which may emerge any time now.
"Five-year plans are for the proletariat, not the planners."
DeleteIs it possible to make a five-year plan under socialism? Hold on, I gotta make a call to Venezuela.
Nevermind, the phone lines are down. Again.
DeleteMr. E-man-u-el....code this.
ReplyDeleteJust imagine if Trump had said "we've built the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics" and the bizarro vote counting then suddenly brought him from behind literally overnight.
ReplyDeleteGee, I wonder how the left would be responding right now.
Was Rahm hinting at how they "won"?
ReplyDeleteThere is actually something the legislatures of WI, MI, PA, GA, and AZ could do- pass resolutions ordering a recount and and an audit of the elections in their states. I would suggest this to all of the states at this point. I simply don't trust teh software that is being used.
ReplyDeleteSuch resolutions would give the courts something to use for justification- the Constitution itself.
Will they do this? I don't know. Right now, the Democrats' plan is to deny a recount in the midwest states, but the legislatures can act here without the governor's consent.
There seems a possibility that GA could go that way, via the SecState office. Not a full recount at this point, but they are going to rerun Friday's count and may do an audit, which they've done in prior elections. High level involvement both of office holders as well as investigators.
DeleteSome questions...How do bicameral legislatures take action? How do they act as one? By joint resolution? If not signed by the Governor would a joint resolution have the force of law? How does a legislature execute its actions? How does a legislature execute its actions if they don't have the force of law?
DeleteDunno. But that's what the US Constitution says. 'The legislatures shall determine the time and manner of holding elections.' It doesn't say 'each state shall', which would imply passing a law that was signed by the governor--although that, in fact, is what most states (all states?) have done. Presumably either the state constitution or a specific law sets it out. I agree it seems odd, but the idea seems to be to insure a broad consensus.
Delete"Presumably either the state constitution or a specific law sets it out."
DeleteIf only there was case law about this, but I gather that we've not seen one come up.
The Framers had dealt with the likes of George III, but I'm not sure they were envisioning how to deal with the chicanery of Mrs Clinton and her Lawfare friends.
DeleteNothings anonymous but ill take the risk. Im at peace right now. I know truth. Id rather know the truth, as bad as that truth may be, than live an illusion. Trump being elected revealed so many truths, so many. The masses now know the truth. They know their commons sense and gut instincts are right. They know that for decades they've been living an illusion. We actually thought Mccain or Romney cared, we actually thought some of the media was honest, even if they were partisan,. We thought we could trust the inteloigence community. Thats so 2015. We were wrong and now we know. Im at peace.
ReplyDelete"We thought we could trust the intelligence community. Thats so 2015. We were wrong and now we know."
Delete2010. But nobody knows about that, thanks to that "honest" media.
IMO, this election is more like a murder thriller: the lights go down, there is a scream and with the stage relit, a body is on the floor. In this case we need a forensic autopsy to know the manner of election fraud, if any. The nation should be a witness to all the bloody details no matter how ugly.
ReplyDelete