Can't beat Don Surber:
Reuters tried to spin its post-election poll, but buried in Paragraph 10 was the truth: Only "55% of adults in the United States said they believed the Nov. 3 presidential election was legitimate and accurate, which is down 7 points from a similar poll that ran shortly after the 2016 election. The 28% who said they thought the election was 'the result of illegal voting or election rigging' is up 12 points from four years ago."
Russian Collusion was a hoax.
Vote fraud is a Democrat tradition.
A large portion of American adults do not believe Biden is the president-elect.
And given that Reuters-Ipsos was off in the 2016 election and again in the 2020 election by 4 points, it is likely that less than half of adults believe Biden won fair and square.
And the poll was skewed to Democrats.
Reuters said, "The Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted online, in English, throughout the United States. It gathered responses from 1,346 respondents, including 598 Democrats and 496 Republicans, and has a credibility interval, a measure of precision, of 5 percentage points."
...
This is what Dems have done to the country. And they don't care.
Where is Sydney Powell? She and Guilliani dropped MOABs, and appear to have gone silent.
ReplyDeleteShipwreckedcrew had a post earlier today (sorry I can't seem to find it now) saying that Giuliani had presented arguments in court and seemed to prove he was out of his depth arguing election law. Not encouraging.
DeleteI'm looking for a sign that Trump was actually proactive in anticipating the fraud, not really hearing much right now to sustain that hope.
Still keeping faith, but must also begin to anticipate life in the virtual reality being promulgated by the Left.
Yes Rudy got his clock cleaned in court. I've NO IDEA why he was lead in a state court case where he has never practiced, never lived, in a field he knows nothing about... After almost 30 years out of FEDERAL court.
DeleteIt's like they wanted to throw it.
Was SWC in the courtroom w Guiliani? Bannon's show had a guy who was there for the entire 5 or 6 hour ordeal and stated that Guiliani was very sharp on all the facts about the PA fraud. Some questions came up about whether the fraud might've been coordinated in other states. Rudy was, reportedly, not as sharp.
DeleteI was concerned about that. Then I read SWC who says that's what happened.
DeleteElection law is a highly technical area--you can't just wing it.
DeleteDid Rudy's ego get in the way of qualified election law attorneys?
Delete@mistcr - I think this is the writeup from SWC to which you refer...ouch. https://redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/11/18/oral-argument-on-motions-to-dismiss-in-pennsylvania-case-was-an-opportunity-lost-strategic-vision-needed-n281500
DeleteDave
What of the server?
ReplyDeleteSydney Powell has been doing interviews left and right..
ReplyDeleteI just listened to one she did on Rush, with Mark Levine hosting.
Howie Carr had an interview with Lin Wood.
Powell was on Newsmax I think.
CT had links.
Can anyone here recommend sites, which carry updates on the major courtroom developments?
DeleteEsp. any site which has daily updates.
DeleteFor a site on general vote-counting developments, see
Deletehttp://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/ .
Interviews. That should do it.
DeleteI recomend Powell's and Lin Woods' twitter feed. They have many updates w links to other news etc... they're also on Parler.
Delete"Trust the plan"
ReplyDeleteI dunno, ever since JFK Jr failed to resurrect and replace the VP on the ticket, I've begun to question everything — especially JFK Jr's commitment to "The Plan".
DeleteThanks Ray-SoCal. I am not clear where this alleged evidence goes. Through what legal channel does it climb? Interviews aren't going to drive this potential dagger through the heart of this beast, and the click is ticking. What's next? Does anybody have any idea? Dave
ReplyDeleteBest hopes...
DeleteWisconsin, 2 county recount. I'm not sure why they are only requesting two, seems like a bad idea.
Michigan is a disaster... Every case has been kicked to the curb in court. You have wrong attorneys representing the wrong subjects. (Rudy needs to stick to fox news interviews and STAY OUT OF COURT). He hasn't practiced on almost 30 years and looks like a babbling idiot.
Saving grace may be the attempted recant of one district certification... That may or may not stand because they first voted to certify, then said it was under threat. (What a joke)
Georgia has vowed to certify the original election results even though the recounts are not complete (midnight tomorrow) and are very different than the original numbers.
Pennsylvania... Who knows.
Where in the hell is the real evidence everyone keeps talking about?
First,let's be clear. We are in as much an information war as a legal and constitutional war. Powell et al are doing interviews because it's vital in the info war. The beast, as you say, has many heads and convincing people that the sham vote was legit is a dangerous one.
DeleteSecond, there are several, good sites and shows out there that go in depth on the strategy and process being pursued. Bannon's War Room is pretty good. Mark Levin covers parts. Lin Wood and Sidney Powell parler feeds are a wealth of info. America's Real Voice network, OAN have guests who explain alot of this. Despite YouTube's censorship there's still a lot of videos out there on this topic, for now.
@ devilman
DeleteI was also puzzled by the choice of only two counties for the recount. After all, it's well documented--statistically--that significant hanky panky occurred with the tabulation of votes in the WOW counties. On reflection, I'm wondering whether this is simply a place holding operation, while the bigger case is made. IOW, it may be easier to keep things going by showing voter fraud in Milwaukee while the bigger election fraud case is being made. Strictly speculating, because the inside details of these maneuverings is above my pay grade at this point.
In MI, quite a story, about a row about GOP canvass board members:
Delete"In dramatic reversal, Wayne County election board Republicans rescind votes certifying results.
In affidavits, GOP canvass board members claim they were **bullied** and say there are too many irregularities in Detroit vote to justify accepting election results....
(leading to) Democratic allegations of racism and **threats** against their safety....
'The comments made accusations of *racism* and threatened me and members of my **family**', Palmer said in her affidavit."
From John Solomon, at
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wayne-county-election-board-republicans-say-they-were-bullied-rescind .
Disclaimer- not a lawyer.
ReplyDeleteIt seems the current suits are more placeholders till Sidney Powell submits and amendments based on the information she gets that is acceptable in court.
There are two battles that are being fought against the voter fraud, public opinion and courts.
The hints of foreign involvement, Cuba, Venezuela, and China.
The hints are the software was developed for Venezuela to rig elections and a Canadian company, dominion, somehow sells it into the US, tabulation done in Spain and Germany.
And this article talks about all the powerful Democrats related to the counting software.
https://spectator.org/sidney-powell-kraken-dominion/
What has worried me is that Sidney keeps talking about how they can prove that the software was designed with mal intent. What they need to prove is that it was USED with mal intent in THIS election. They need to translate stats into a concrete demand for a remedy.
DeleteI just read the American Spectator article Ray linked above.
DeleteIt made me wonder, given all of the deep Deep State connections to previous attempts to oust Trump, and the 'fact' that some of the election data may have found its way into computers in Germany, which computers may have been maintained by US intelligence entities...whether it was the CIA (or some other Deep State alphabet agency) which actually changed the votes.
I ask because the similarity and overlap between counting shutdowns in several states and vote flips turning up as similar statistical anomalies or impossibilities in various states suggests a degree of coordination and sophistication which it is hard to imagine the local hacks in Philadelphia and Detroit and Milwaukee and Atlanta could have pulled off independently by themselves. And would Dominion and/or Smartmatic officials have decided on their own initiative to plug in some new software and change a few votes? Which votes? How many? Was Admiral Neffenger sitting at a keyboard in his study at 4 am Wednesday morning deciding which votes to switch?
Could someone (ones) have been sitting in a room in Germany (or wherever) watching the whole national picture unfold and then call the shots on vote changing in various jurisdictions, such as Red districts where a few more votes for Biden wouldn't be noticed? Where local election officials wouldn't even know that votes had been changed?
Of course this is a conspiracy...theory...but given the utter audaciousness and criminality of the Russia Hoax, the Flynn Gambit, and the Impeachment Joke, all of which were pretty clearly orchestrated and coordinated by the Deep State, should we dismiss the possibility out of hand?
And, if this is the case, perhaps this is the evidentiary package that Sidney Powell and team are taking their time assembling.
Just a theory...
Cassander, feel free to redo your comment on the new post.
Deletehttps://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/11/17/lord-malloch-brown-revealed-the-british-hand-behind-coup-shows-its-scales-again/
ReplyDeleteMore on the intriguing connections between British Intelligence and Malloch Brown and Soros and Smartmatic and election fraud and globalism.
I love Malloch Brown's reference not to 'elections' but to 'election projects'. Yes, of course. They are projects.
'election projects'
DeleteVery felicitous way of putting it.
Yes, it really is a conspiracy. And there really is a reason why Americans have been conditioned to reject out of hand any notion that has been labeled 'conspiracy theory.'
Delete"...Americans have been conditioned to reject out of hand any notion that has been labeled 'conspiracy theory.'"
DeleteThis is a key aspect of a Color Revolution and arises from the axiom of the Big Lie. If enough people believe something then it becomes true.
Imagine how much worse it would be if Media.corp hadn't spent the last four years burning their credibility like cord-wood in a Klondike bathhouse.
Tom S.
At this point, the Trump team needs to present a credible confession of someone who used computers to massively affect votes. Without such a confession, Trump has lost the election.
ReplyDeleteConfessions--especially when the target is backed up by The Deep State--are far easier said than done. I would prefer to hope that the statistical evidence can be presented in a convincing fashion. As far back as 1976 a federal court HELD--not just opined--that statistical evidence could lead to a complete REDO of an election. The use of statistics for evidentiary purposes has become light years more sophisticated in the intervening close on to half a century. Don't say never yet.
DeleteMark,
ReplyDeleteWhat an insightful and troubling comment!
Ray
>there really is a reason why Americans have been
>conditioned to reject out of hand any notion that has been
> labeled 'conspiracy theory.'
Snake oil carnys like Alex Jones do a good job keeping that conditioning in excellent working order.
Delete-->And the poll was skewed to Democrats.<--
ReplyDeleteOf course it was. In a country roughly 30/30/40, their sample was 44% Dem, 37% Rep, 19% Ind. IIRC, Gallop's recent party ID survey had Reps with a slight advantage over Dems (but I can't put my finger on that).