Earlier today commenter Bebe pointed out a specific example of the increasingly common stories we're seeing, in which "unexpected" consequences to the experimental "vaccines" (these aren't really 'vaccines' in the scientific definition) that are being pushed on one and all:
California Calls for Pause in Use of Huge Batch of Moderna Vaccines
California officials late Sunday directed COVID-19 vaccine providers to not administer any doses from a batch of over 330,000 that was circulated across the state.
The reason was a “higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions,” California State Epidemiologist Dr. Erica Pan said in a statement. The doses were produced by Moderna.
That reminded me of an article that I was saving for later. Even as public health officials raised questions about the Moderna 'vaccine', Moderna's CEO seems confident of the future new normal--everyone will be vaxxed, and that regularly:
CEO of vaccine maker Moderna: ‘We’re going to live with this virus … forever’
‘Health officials will have to continuously watch for new variants of the virus so scientists can produce vaccines to fight them,’ said Moderna’s Stephane Bancel.
Right. This is one of those good news/bad news stories. The good news is that we're going to be living with Covid forever. The bad news is that we'll also be living with Moderna forever. Nice business model--you makes vaccines and the government, i.e., the World Government after the Great Reset, coerces the entire world population into getting vaxxed by your business. Maybe several times a year. And God only knows what all will be included in those 'vaccines', since the Ruling Elite won't be sharing that with us--although Bill Gates has hinted at the possibilities--such as population control:
Many health experts, such as the U.K.’s chief scientific advisor, Patrick Vallance, believe that COVID-19 is endemic, meaning it will be ever-present, as is the flu.
Additionally, many high profile figures such as Bill Gates and Dr. Anthony Fauci have said that life will go “back to normal” only after the population is widely vaccinated.
The emergence of new strains of COVID-19, however, raises the question of whether public health authorities will deem lockdowns perpetually necessary, as the world continues to anticipate new strains of the virus, perhaps indefinitely.
Moderna’s Bancel himself has also suggested that new vaccines will continue to be produced as new variants of the virus emerge.
“Health officials will have to continuously watch for new variants of the virus, so scientists can produce vaccines to fight them,” Bancel added during Wednesday’s panel discussion, according to CNBC.
And just in time to inaugurate this New Normal--yeah, that joke's on you--we have the Ruling Class installing their new regime this week: Biden Inc. Funny how coincidences work.
I wonder, if anyone in my family dies after having to take the vaccine, what are my legal options?ReplyDelete
Well, since we apparently are in the process of moving to a CCP model, when they execute someone they send the family a bill for the bullet.Delete
That's what I was afraid to hear. Apparently CNBC thinks same, big pharma is off the hook even if they kill millions.Delete
IIRC, Trump granted immunity to the vaccine mfgrs in the first "Covid relief" bill.ReplyDelete
So you are S.O.L.
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Protecting Vaccine Makers from State LawsuitsReplyDelete
The United States Supreme Court reached a decision recently, concluding that federal law protects vaccine makers from product-liability lawsuits that are filed in state courts and seek damages for injuries or death attributed to a vaccine.
In the 57-page opinion written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Supreme Court explained that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA or Act) preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by a vaccine’s side effects.
The Court’s 6-2 decision reasoned that “a vaccine side effect could always have been avoidable by use of a different vaccine not containing the harmful element. The language of the [NCVIA] thus suggests the design is not subject to question in a tort action. What the statute establishes as a complete defense must be unavoidability (given safe manufacture and warning) with respect to the particular design.
This conclusion is supported by the fact that, although products-liability law establishes three grounds for liability—defective manufacture, inadequate directions or warnings, and defective design—the Act mentions only manufacture and warnings. It thus seems that the Act’s failure to mention design-defect liability is “by deliberate choice, not inadvertence.”
The Covid19 “vaccines” are not vaccines in the usual sense. Thus is would appear that these “vaccines” could fall through a hole left deliberately in the Act?
33, a message to fellow masons that this is part of the planReplyDelete