The other day we asked--tongue in cheek--why would anyone not trust their government. As if on cue, the government has provided a perfect, well, reminder of that basic fact of life. The FDA 'authorization' of a Covid 'vaccine' is another one of those now-you-see-it-now-you-don't government actions. One is left wondering, What does it mean? Fortunately, there are people who can explain it.
First the short version, via Twitter:
1/ So now that Come-Here-Naughty is approved (ish), the @moderna_tx @JNJNews lose their Emergency Use Authorizations, right? Because there's an approved alternative and you can't have an EUA when there are "adequate, approved, and available alternatives."— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021
2/ Or is this another reason @us_fda is going out of its way to say Comirnaty is not available?— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021
"although COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is approved... there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution to this population."https://t.co/XrqIORQZVt
3/ Whatever game(s) they are playing here, they're being too clever by half.— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021
SOURCE: Footnote 9https://t.co/sEU2YzOwfP
In other words, the vax that was 'approved' you can't have. What was the point? This looks like an attempt to extend the Emergency Use Authorizations, which provide full immunity. The FDA couldn't actually approve those EUA injections because they haven't completed the clinical trials--and won't, if ever, for quite some time. It boils down to a ploy to 'mandate' that people participate in the Great Experiment, under the assumption that people won't read the fine print. People will assume that these EUA injections are what were approved. But they're not. You can't have what was approved.
Think I'm wrong about people being fooled like that? Look what a savvy guy like Don Surber--who went and got himself shot up--wrote this morning [his typos, not mine:
"People will need to wear masks regardless of whether they are vaccinated."
If you still must wear masks, what was the point in vaccination?
It is as if they do not know what they are doing, not that any doubt wold stop them from doing what they are doing.
Actually, they really do know what they're doing and, of course, aren't about to stop doing it. But what about Surber? If a well informed guy like Surber clearly didn't bother getting informed about these 'vaccines' and still hasn't bothered, what's the likelihood that large numbers of others will also be fooled? Pretty high, I'd guess. That's your government at work. Surber thought he knew what a 'vaccine' is and didn't need to read about these gene based 'vaccines'. Trust the science, I suppose. Most people who got vaxxed thought 'vaccine' meant 'vaccine'--just like tetanus, or measles, mumps rubella, etc. That's what the government wanted them to think.
Now here's an article that gives you the longer version or explanation. It exposes the full cynicism of your government toward its subject population, and the equal cynicism and devil-may-care operating practices of Big Pharma. This is what Bannon and Malone were talking about yesterday, but in greater detail. BTW, the Zhou regime as well as your legislators and judges are fully aware of the legal distinctions involved. Who raised a voice when Zhou personally encouraged illegal mandates of experimental injections?
Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.
UPDATE: Better late than never. This should have been in the Bring On The Variants post:
Dangerous New Freedom Variant Causing People To Ignore Government And Live Their Lives https://t.co/RBdrrM2CNx— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) August 24, 2021