UPDATED: Vax 'Authorization': Short And Long Versions

The other day we asked--tongue in cheek--why would anyone not trust their government.  As if on cue, the government has provided a perfect, well, reminder of that basic fact of life. The FDA 'authorization' of a Covid 'vaccine' is another one of those now-you-see-it-now-you-don't government actions. One is left wondering, What does it mean? Fortunately, there are people who can explain it.

First the short version, via Twitter:

1/ So now that Come-Here-Naughty is approved (ish), the @moderna_tx @JNJNews lose their Emergency Use Authorizations, right? Because there's an approved alternative and you can't have an EUA when there are "adequate, approved, and available alternatives."

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021

2/ Or is this another reason @us_fda is going out of its way to say Comirnaty is not available?

"although COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is approved... there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution to this population."https://t.co/XrqIORQZVt

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021

3/ Whatever game(s) they are playing here, they're being too clever by half.

SOURCE: Footnote 9https://t.co/sEU2YzOwfP

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) August 25, 2021

In other words, the vax that was 'approved' you can't have. What was the point? This looks like an attempt to extend the Emergency Use Authorizations, which provide full immunity. The FDA couldn't actually approve those EUA injections because they haven't completed the clinical trials--and won't, if ever, for quite some time. It boils down to a ploy to 'mandate' that people participate in the Great Experiment, under the assumption that people won't read the fine print. People will assume that these EUA injections are what were approved. But they're not. You can't have what was approved.

Think I'm wrong about people being fooled like that? Look what a savvy guy like Don Surber--who went and got himself shot up--wrote this morning [his typos, not mine:

"People will need to wear masks regardless of whether they are vaccinated."

If you still must wear masks, what was the point in vaccination?

It is as if they do not know what they are doing, not that any doubt wold stop them from doing what they are doing.

Actually, they really do know what they're doing and, of course, aren't about to stop doing it. But what about Surber? If a well informed guy like Surber clearly didn't bother getting informed about these 'vaccines' and still hasn't bothered, what's the likelihood that large numbers of others will also be fooled? Pretty high, I'd guess. That's your government at work. Surber thought he knew what a 'vaccine' is and didn't need to read about these gene based 'vaccines'. Trust the science, I suppose. Most people who got vaxxed thought 'vaccine' meant 'vaccine'--just like tetanus, or measles, mumps rubella, etc. That's what the government wanted them to think.

Now here's an article that gives you the longer version or explanation. It exposes the full cynicism of your government toward its subject population, and the equal cynicism and devil-may-care operating practices of Big Pharma. This is what Bannon and Malone were talking about yesterday, but in greater detail. BTW, the Zhou regime as well as your legislators and judges are fully aware of the legal distinctions involved. Who raised a voice when Zhou personally encouraged illegal mandates of experimental injections?

2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine

Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.

...

But there are several bizarre aspects to the FDA approval that will prove confusing to those not familiar with the pervasiveness of the FDA’s regulatory capture, or the depths of the agency’s cynicism.

First, the FDA acknowledges that while Pfizer has “insufficient stocks” of the newly licensed Comirnaty vaccine available, there is “a significant amount” of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine — produced under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) — still available for use.

The FDA decrees that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under the EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product.

Second, the FDA pointed out that the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine and the existing, EUA Pfizer vaccine are “legally distinct,” but proclaims that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”

There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA has fully licensed.

EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.

U.S. laws, however, permit employers and schools to require students and workers to take licensed vaccines.

EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield under the 2005 Public Readiness and Preparedness Act. Vaccine manufacturers, distributors, providers and government planners are immune from liability. The only way an injured party can sue is if he or she can prove willful misconduct, and if the U.S. government has also brought an enforcement action against the party for willful misconduct. No such lawsuit has ever succeeded.

...

At least for the moment, the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield. Vials of the branded product, which say “Comirnaty” on the label, are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products.

...

Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.

Given this background, the FDA’s acknowledgement in its approval letter that there are insufficient stocks of the licensed Comirnaty, but an abundant supply of the EUA Pfizer BioNTech jab, exposes the “approval” as a cynical scheme to encourage businesses and schools to impose illegal jab mandates.

The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.

Americans, told that the Pfizer COVID vaccine is now licensed, will understandably assume COVID vaccine mandates are lawful. But only EUA-authorized vaccines, for which no one has any real liability, will be available during the next few weeks when many school mandate deadlines occur.

The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.

While the media has trumpeted that the FDA has approved COVID vaccines, the FDA has not approved the Pfizer BioNTech vaccines, nor any COVID vaccines for the 12- to 15-year age group, nor any booster doses for anyone.

And the FDA has not licensed any Moderna vaccine, nor any vaccine from Johnson & Johnson — so the vast majority, if not all, of vaccines available in the U.S. remain unlicensed EUA products.

Here’s what you need to know when somebody orders you to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product.

If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.

If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse.

The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public — but we don’t have to play along. If it doesn’t say Comirnaty, you have not been offered an approved vaccine.

UPDATE: Better late than never. This should have been in the Bring On The Variants post:

Dangerous New Freedom Variant Causing People To Ignore Government And Live Their Lives https://t.co/RBdrrM2CNx

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) August 24, 2021