Cat, Bag ... Out! Plus, Who Lost ... Sweden?

Dr. Robert Malone's twitter feed has become a bit of a go to morning check for Covid commentary and news. There are others, of course, but he retweets lots of good information.

This morning there seems to be almost a theme to most of it--cats getting out the bags they had been kept in. And we all know how hard it is to get cats back into their bags, so that's a good thing.

For example, in his understated way--which requires some reflection--Malone shares a revelation from Dr. Rochelle, who seems to me to not entirely understand what the program is. Otherwise, why would she open this bag full of cats?

Assuming this is verified, "reports from Israel suggest INCREASED RISK OF SEVERE DISEASE amongst those vaccinated early" => ADE. Just saying. https://t.co/TipjRT4JII

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) August 19, 2021

Why do I say that items like this require some reflection? Well, ask yourself: Fine, ADE; just because the virus finds a workaround (mutation/variant) for the vax, why should that lead to increased risk of serious illness? Serious illness could lead to death, right?

Now consider this. It appears that in the UK among the unvaxxed there's next to no risk associated with the Dread Delta, so why would there be an increased risk among the vaxxed In Israel--and, presumably, elsewhere among the vaxxed? Obviously there's something else going on besides mutations in the virus, and that something else may have to do with changes in the immune system induced by the vax itself.

For reference:

The Delta “scare”, in perspective.

UK’s Official VoC Report (Aug 6; Table 5)

147,612 Delta infections in unvaccinated people < age 50

48 deaths

99.97% survival, if infected at all

And we need to vax everyone w/ unproven jabs?https://t.co/7SvkHuEmVf

— College Baseball 365 (@Stu_Murray1) August 17, 2021

Please note--this doesn't even get into the issue of whether those 48 had co-morbidities or were otherwise immuno-compromised.

Here's another consideration. Dr. Rochelle, as I say, appears a bit clueless. Why would she appear to be surprised at this development when--of all unlikely people--Zhou himself implicitly claims not to have been surprised:

Biden's speech from August 18. Yes, he just said they have been preparing for a 3rd booster for months... The link https://t.co/at6RDBH5nq

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) August 19, 2021

Which leads to the question: When did they know they'd need a boost? Did they know that there could be other vax issues beside waning effectiveness, issues like with reaction of the human immune system? Is that part of the significance of the Japanese regulatory study on the Pfizer injection--the cat that Dr. Byram Bridle (very deliberately) let out of its bag?

Lotta questions, and there should be people reflecting on them. We know people with PhDs have been reflecting on these questions really hard, because they're the ones who are the most vax hesitant.

Now, while all this has been going on, people have been obsessed with the inevitable question: Who lost Afghanistan. But how about this one: Who lost India? Afghanistan is a remote location that could easily be misplaced, but how about an entire subcontinent? To lose an entire subcontinent seems well beyond careless, and yet here's India--birthplace of the Dread Delta--and it's been weeks since we've heard news from there. Not since, well, not since some major Indian states began mass medicating with Ivermectin. Oh, and did you know that India, birthplace of the Dread Delta, was also the location of a vax trial? Just sayin'. It's probably one of those weird coincidences.

But that brings us to Sweden. Who lost Sweden? Because we're not hearing much about Sweden--which notoriously went its own way and shunned the Covid Panic. There actually is news from Sweden, accompanied by a  nice picture:

Sweden's 7-day average COVID deaths have been at ZERO for about a month now.

I feel like its only a matter of time before the very existence of a place called Sweden is scrubbed from the internet. pic.twitter.com/O3ivyGmpvp

— Brumby (@the_brumby) August 17, 2021

Finally, this article is kinda darkly humorous:

U.S. officials’ decision on Covid-19 booster shots baffles — and upsets — some scientists

Of course the really disturbing thing is that only "some" scientists are baffled and upset, which suggests that they still haven't noticed all those cats on the loose. What world have they been living in?

Many flat-out challenged the need for booster doses at this time. Others questioned the morality of administering third shots to Americans when most people on the planet haven’t received one. And some worried that a decision had been made before the Food and Drug Administration had ruled on the need for a booster or a key vaccine advisory committee had evaluated the data — typically the way vaccine policy is set.

We're in the new normal where rules and procedures are promulgated and dropped on an ad hoc basis. As a form of governmental, ruling elite, performance art. Data? That's all handled on a need to know basis--and you don't need to know!