Totally brilliant post from Babylon Bee:
100 Million Vaccine-Hesitant Americans Will Get The Shot Now That A Government Agency Said It’s OK https://t.co/O3CBTrSlRh— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) August 23, 2021
According to sources, the Food and Drug Administration is completely trustworthy and has never approved harmful drugs for the public before. Those sources further confirmed that the FDA is a part of the government, which has never lied or been incompetent or corrupt in any way.
"Yeah, I've always trusted the government and drug companies, so I guess I'm ok to get the vaccine now," said Bubba Snugglebrugg, who was previously a militant anti-vaxxer. "I can't wait to get my 'Fauci Ouchie' and wear my Pfizer sticker! Thanks, FDA!"
Sources within the FDA say the vaccine went through a rigorous approval process of various government bureaucrats saying "Oh well, what the heck—we may as well approve this now", and signing a very important-looking document with a government seal and some big words on it.
"Sources within the FDA say the vaccine went through a rigorous approval process"...ReplyDelete
Like tossing their control groups! Good job America!!!
With trust in government rightfully at an historic low, it is doubtful they'll see the numbers they're hoping for by saying FDA approved. But it will give the tyrants leverage to 'demand' or 'mandate' vaccinations which is what was really desired after all. How far this is allowed to proceed will ultimately be up to the courts as many will never agree to be vaccinated with a vaccine whose long term health after-affects are unknown.ReplyDelete
Surprisingly, the uptick in 'breakthrough' cases happened quickly. Not a real confidence builder if you've been sitting on the fence and still have time to watch events unfold...
Boeing 737 MAX was approved too.ReplyDelete
Boeing 787 Dreamliner, too. Remember the battery fires?Delete
Anyone else have a problem with the word hope? I had a boss that you never said the word hope or you'd get the "Hope is not a strategy" rant.ReplyDelete
Q: If a person has received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, will the vaccine protect against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination?
A: Most vaccines that protect from viral illnesses also reduce transmission of the virus that causes the disease by those who are vaccinated. While it is hoped this will be the case, the scientific community does not yet know if the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine will reduce such transmission.
Also, both Pfizer and moderna fertility disclosures: "talk to your doctor", not we've haven't tested it other than a 2 week rat test that showed spike protein collected in the ovaries and therefor we didn't see a need to look anymore./s
It's a total disgrace, but the sheeple are OK with it.Delete
Is there a scientific definition of 'hope?' Perhaps it is related to 'pray.' I doubt either of these terms will be found in science textbooks. Yet, here we are where hope seems to have displaced actual research. Sacrifices must be made to reach the preordained outcome...Delete
Here is the link to an excellent documentary about the Great Reset. Please take the time to watch. God, please help us.ReplyDelete
Very interesting. I got to the point where Gates was being interviewed on TV. Gates makes Zhou look like a really sharp thinker and fluent speaker. No exaggeration.Delete
Speaking of trusting (or mistrusting) the government, listen to what Mike Yeadon relays in this recent video. I have long believed that the profit motive lay behind the scamdemic and the jabs. Not anymore. The demons we face are much more sinister than mere mammon.ReplyDelete
I should have been clearer. Yeadon relays an allegation that a three-year supply of an “end of life” sedative (i.e., a euthanizing agent) has gone missing, apparently used up during the scamdemic. This brings to mind Catherine Austin Fitts remarks about designs to solve the pension insolvency crisis by shortening life expectancy.Delete
Yes, and you can put that together with the vid re the great reset in which they say that what will emerge from AI will be a quite large "useless class" of people. That's also reminiscent of the Neocons talking about how America needs a new population.Delete
I think we may want to take another look at Dr. David Martin. He may not know his criminal law, but he does know technology patents and the money that flows into and from technological innovation, including it seems immunological parents and innovation. That he is being interviewed by Reiner Fullmich makes it doubly interesting. What do you want to bet these assholes left a trail of patents with all their brilliant work with gain of function research?Delete
What reason do we have that any of this will stop until the perpetrators have personal incentives to stop? We have seen how votes do not win elections anymore. We have seen how even Supreme court orders can be ignored (how many infantry divisions does John Roberts have?) if you are on the right team. FDA drug safety requirements can be ignored.Delete
What rules cannot be ignored? How will these tyrants be challenged? What do they put at risk to issue their dictates and mandates? From what I can see the answers to these questions are clear. They have learned that 1) there is literally nothing that they cannot order and 2) there is no risk involved for them. They have benefitted hugely from their arrogation of power. Nothing is going to change until their personal risk-reward calculation is changed.
The only way to challenge them is to push back publicly against them. They have benefitted from the deception of the two party system and the subsuming if conservative citizenry in the republican party, but that is slowly changing. They seem very powerful but the world is a really hard thing to control without a LOT of cooperation. Their plans go to sh**, their plans are already going to sh**, as more and more people realize they have a choice whether to cooperate or not. Example, in order to exert control regarding vaccine mandates, you'll notice they have to get the cooperation of "businesses" to coerce their employees to get the jab. But if the individual business owners and the individual employees refuse to cooperate, and the more and more that do, the harder for them to succeed at controlling the entire population. It *seems* like it might work in theory, but in practice, well think Iraq war or Afghanistan or whatever. People don't like being controlled to the extent this cabal thinks they can control them. A majority of the people who took the jab will think a lot harder about the booster and the next booster and the flu vaccine and whatever other BS Tony dreams up. And when they fail, there will be consequences. Let's hasten their failure by pushing back as publicly as we can. The time is now to stand up and be counted. Mark A.Delete
Jen Psaki = Baghdad BettyReplyDelete
My husband and I are in our mid 50's and are not going to get the jab. I work from home but the hubs works with the public every day. We have taken our vitamins from the beginning of all of this and as far as we know, neither of us have gotten covid. However there was a time in late 2019 when there was a nasty upper respiratory bug going around where we live and my hubs brought it home at around Thanksgiving. He was sick for 3 days and then was over it. I caught it and it took me 3 weeks of tons of chest congestion to finally get over it. We both think that we may have had it then but are not going to do anything to get tested for antibodies.ReplyDelete
We were talking about how so many places of work are requiring that workers get the jab recently and have both decided that if we are required to get a covid shot that we will refuse and resign if necessary. We both are healthy and obviously can get over a nasty upper respiratory infection on our own. Why should we be forced to get an injection of something we don't need? Oh yeah....because "they" said so.
Do NOT resign. Make them fire you as that has legal consequences. There are resources online that provide legal letter templates you can use with employers that will scare off all but the most die hard rabid Jab Mongers.Delete
They pretend to approve the vaccine, Americans can pretend to get the vaccine.ReplyDelete
This just out via Berenson.ReplyDelete
"SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is poised to acquire complete
resistance to wild-type spike vaccines" - aka Pfizer et. al.
I saw an item that Pfizer acknowledged as much this morning, but said they could come up with a boost within 3 months. IOW, this is whack-a-mole time, with the difference that Pfizer continues raking in huge amounts of money for each guaranteed to fail boost.Delete
And in case anyone was afraid that Trump supporters indiscriminately worship the guy there's this:ReplyDelete
Trump booed at rally after telling supporters to 'take the vaccine' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9916429/Moment-Donald-Trump-BOOED-Alabama-rally-encouraging-supporters-vaccine.html?ito=native_share_article-masthead
This is what I've been saying all along. Trump cannot have it both ways. He's in a jam. If he continues to push the jab in the face of the horrific data about it then he will alienate his base and he's done.
Really, we're in the fight of our lives against drug mandates and we need Trump out in front fighting with us. If he is with the Jab Mongers then he's done. Forget him.
So, uhh, you mean Trump has to be perfectly what you deem it to be?Delete
Reagan had his Lebanon issue amongst others, like using Iran to fight in Latin America.
No, Trump doesn't have to be perfectly what we deem it to be, but these jabs are of far greater magnitude than were Lebanon etc.Delete