Emerald Robinson is on a toot, er, tweet today. We all know the weaknesses of Twitter and related social media platforms, but when used well a single tweet can be a game changer for many people--it can give them just enough information in a convenient package to make their mind up.
Robinson demonstrates this in a series of tweets this morning ranging over the only really important stories out there. For example, few of us any longer have the energy or time to really immerse ourselves in the details of the election fraud. We know it happened, but ...
What's important--as the Left knows so well--is the narrative. A few tweets can paint the big picture that's all most people really need or want:
Emerald Robinson 
@EmeraldRobinson
It's all about the A-U-D-I-T in A-R-I-Z-O-N-A.
8:04 AM · May 25, 2021
Emerald Robinson 
@EmeraldRobinson
Did you know there's an audit of ballots in New Hampshire?
Did you know: a majority of ballots had been folded & were creased?
Did you know: as many as 60% of the folded ballots were improperly counted by the machines?
8:17 AM · May 25, 2021
Emerald Robinson 
@EmeraldRobinson
Did you know: the audit was ordered because the machines did not count the votes from the physical ballots accurately?
Did you know: the first recount showed R votes were undercounted while D votes were overcounted?
Only a hand recount caught the errors.
8:21 AM · May 25, 2021·

@EmeraldRobinson
The smoking gun.
Quote Tweet
The Epoch Times
@EpochTimes
Election auditors Windham, #NewHampshire, are saying that some of their latest findings are “large enough to account for discrepancies” in the 2020 election results for 4 state representative seats. https://theepochtimes.com/new-hampshire-2020-election-audit-finds-experimental-confirmation-of-machine-irregularities_3826650.html?
11:49 AM · May 25, 2021·
BOOM! And, yes, right now AZ looks like the Big Enchilada--not least because of the apparent full bore complicity of the local GOPe with a radical Soros SecState.
Moving on to Fauci, ER drops a nuclear tweet on Tony that gathers several issues--vaxxes, Wuhan, Fauci personally--all in one. There's brilliance in that:
Our grandkids are going to laugh at us and say: “So everyone took medical advice about the coronavirus which came from the Wuhan Virology Lab from the same guy who gave coronavirus grant money to the Wuhan Virology Lab?”
— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) March 14, 2021
ER has lots more today on the Wuhan Lab, conflicts of interest for Fauci and Moderna, also for NIH scientists--but I like the way she destroys the MSM in two quick hitting tweets. Again, it's brilliant because the reader can absorb this quickly and move on, but it impacts far more widely than just the issue at hand:
Who cares what the Wall Street Journal wrote about Wuhan now? It's so late to the party that it might as well be the maid.
— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) May 24, 2021
RIP: @maggieNYT.
— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) May 25, 2021
Appearing on CNN to explain that you've been wrong FOR A YEAR but liberals will understand because "hey we all know it's Trump's fault!" is so dumb & dishonest that you're shocked anyone can take these people seriously. https://t.co/82DpxVnGHe
Does that remind you of the Russia Hoax? When will the MSMers return their Pulitzers for that one? Or maybe Pulitzers aren't really about what most people tend to think journalism is all about.
“Pulitzers”? Please. About as much use as a PhD - “Pretty High & Deep”- anymore. Pulitzers are - like so many “awards” these days - bestowed for having/advancing the politically correct or establishment “accepted” narrative. Don’t believe me? Look @ all the “awards” the NYT secured “investigating” “Trump Russian Collusion”. The entire sordid lie was nothing but an excuse to get a SP assigned & find a crime to extract him out of the Oval Office. As we all know the whole, entire thing was a hoax from the beginning.
ReplyDeleteDid the NYT give the awards back? How can/do you keep an award for “investigating” something that never took place? The real story would have been to break the conspiracy of lies around it but no establishment media person would do that because they were all in it together. It’s akin to giving Cuomo an Emmy Award for his “reporting” during the Scamdemic. “Reporting”? He was killing people & covering it up & he gets an award? The whole thing is a joke. These people are jokes. None of it is real.
This country is filled with people who live in unreality & who will never get out of it. It’s like Hitler talking about “Final Victory” as Russian tanks roll down the Unter den Linden.
The film “Falling Down” is a eerily prescient commentary on our times; at the end Michael Douglas’ character says to Robert Duvall’s character “I followed the rules. I did as they told me to do & I’m the bad guy?”
Boarwild
give awards back?? Hell, the NYT still hasn't given back its Pullitzers for helping Stalin commit genocide on the Ukrainians through an artificial 'famine' back in the 1930s. Their reporter let Stalin officials ghost write all his false reports to deny there was any problem at all.
ReplyDeleteAll those Pulitzers have a 'no returns' policy once you've bought them. haha Bigger question is why does anyone think those prizes mean anything??
Ouch on the Wall Street journal...
ReplyDeleteOpinion page is more conservative, but the news is written by the same class of people there that write for the NYT and Washington Post.
Sad to say, since I grew up with the Journal, but their opinion page is also in the toilet. The swirling started in 2016.
DeleteIt started before 2016. I'd been a subscriber since the mid 70s when I let it lapse in 2010. When Rupert bought it a lot of people said "welp that's it for the last good newspaper" and I thought "what do they know?" A lot more than I did.
DeleteThese audits are great and all but you know what you STILL don't see? A single state with a single election integrity bill worth it's paper.
ReplyDeleteThe irony is thick!
@Mark,
ReplyDeletePrior conversation we were having (I can never find my older posts)... You'd mentioned that the AZ SoS wouldn't want to mess with the state Senate...
Well, you nailed that one!!! They kicked her off of election related cases altogether. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-continual-trashing-senate-audit-republican-led-committee-strips-democrat-katie-hobbs-hearing-audit-related-lawsuits-2023/
Let's hope their AG is on the right side of things. Also, I'll admit I'm becoming impressed with AZ's Senate.
Well, that's a big development. They're on solid legal ground and, presumably, have public support.
DeleteMy guess is that their polling shows significant public support, thus their confidence.
DeleteHmmm...yesss...verrry strange. Republicans in touch with the desires of their constituents. What could be wrong with these Arizona pols???
DeleteThey need to start tying in investigations into CTCL activity and connections...push back twice as hard.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/05/26/how_zuckerberg_millions_paid_for_progressives_to_work_with_2020_vote_officials_nationwide_778300.html
Mark A
Absolutely. I've repeatedly expressed the view that Zuckerberg's activity involved--almost certainly--clear illegality.
Delete