Pages

Sunday, May 16, 2021

UPDATED: Tick Tocking The Russia Hoax

Hans Mahncke and Fool Nelson are tick tocking the Russia Hoax. Here's from Mahncke's twitter feed:


Hans Mahncke Retweeted

FOOL NELSON

@FOOL_NELSON

·

1h

Replying to 

@BlackJackBoGre1

 and 

@HansMahncke

Couldn't say, kinda just stumbled behind a curtain accidently.


Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

·

1h

Everyone hates Hannity ticktock and this is not it. The gist of the scoop is that someone who no one in this corner has ever heard of has been quietly working in the background. That person doesn’t know we know and we won’t spoil the surprise. Nothing to do with Durham.

·

2h

.

@Fool_Nelson and I (mainly Fool) have a huge new Russiagate scoop. Someone who really deserves it is in for a very bad surprise. Won’t share details because it needs to stay a surprise but we wanted everyone in this corner who is waiting for justice know that there’s some hope.

Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

·

4h

The fact that it's taking this long means one of two things. Durham is going to take people down or he's running out the clock for those same people. 

Anything less than a McCabe indictment–at a minimum for setting up the ICA part of the coup–must be considered a giant failure.


Well, I can certainly buy into that.

UPDATE:



8 comments:

  1. I vote for running out the clock cuz it already ran out ... ChiBiden is prez.

    I’m just done. I am not sure if voting really means anything.

    Let’s assume Biden’s DoJ indicts people with charges that amount to pretty much sedition when Trump was president (not gunna happen by the way), my response is so?

    Not going to change anything. Not one bit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To further dampen any expectations (predates Trump, ‘magine that?)

    https://capitalresearch.org/article/a-saintly-conspiracy-to-save-democracy/?blm_aid=73350

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh, I forgot to add, this article is all about voter suppression via social media.

    The real deal, in my opinion, is in fraud just like what happened in Mexico in 1988.

    “ This empirical analysis shows that altered tallies were more prevalent in polling stations where the opposition was not present ..”

    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/fingerprints-of-fraud-evidence-from-mexicos-1988-presidential-election/8F3C1BCA4C53FE85EA48E51321E339E9#

    We are Mexico. Not exactly, but we are.

    Yes, the public statements notwithstanding, even by Jimmy Carter standards, our last presidential election was a farce, to put it nicely.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We're surpassing the statue of limitations on some of it as we speak. Especially where the IC is concerned.

    A few more months to eek out and we'll be eating down some of the FBI and ONA participation as well.

    Mission almost accomplished!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I assume "the Fool" and Han's have to be talking about HRC. If in fact that is the case, I'm all in!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mark, I can't help but assimilate "code" words from Twitter feeds/leads to other articles that are timely or near timely with references. Do you think there is anything in his story in The Federalist that "alludes" to the suggestion Han's and "The Fool" suggest? The title is interesting.

    https://thefederalist.com/2021/05/12/behind-the-curtain-how-the-new-york-times-manufactures-lies-for-democrats-to-attack-their-opponents/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be honest I'm not seeing the connection.

      Delete
  7. Not sure if anyone's had a chance to see Techno Fog's latest...

    https://technofog.substack.com/p/on-the-january-2017-felony-leaks

    ReplyDelete