Monday, May 31, 2021

We Made A Big Mistake

There's a huge breaking story out tonight regarding vax safety.

You may--I hope--recall the name Dr. Byram Bridle. Bridle, a viral immunologist at the University of Guelph in Canada, featured in a very lengthy post from mid April (which still makes interesting reading): Vax Hesitancy--Reasonable Or Not? 

On May 29th Bridle gave a blockbuster interview, just eight minutes long, on Canadian radio, and that interview could be a game changer.

What Bridle and some colleagues did was to file the equivalent of a FOIA request with a Japanese regulatory agency that had done a "bio-distribution" study on the mRNA vaccines, i.e., Pfizer and Moderna. What a bio-distribution study tells you is where the vaccine travels in the body. That study, which Bridle had translated, was an eye opener.

‘Terrifying’ new research finds vaccine spike protein unexpectedly in bloodstream. The protein is linked to blood clots, heart and brain damage, and potential risks to nursing babies and fertility.

What I'll do is present some introductory material from the article, but then I'll provide what amounts to a full transcript of Bridle's radio interview. The interview is actually basically a monologue by Bridle, and it's well organized. Following the transcript will be a Youtube of the interview (audio only).

Before any of that, I want to point out that in the interview Bridle talks only about mRNA vaccines--Pfizer and Moderna. Many may be under the impression that side effects are a feature only of J&J and AstraZeneca. That is definitely not the case. In this regard (and others) Bridle is in complete agreement with Sucharit Bhakdi. In fact, the findings that Bridle relates in the interview confirm exactly what we presented Bhakdi stating in Blood Clots And Beyond.

So, with that we turn to the LifeSite article and offer these brief excerpts that will lead into the interview transcript. The entire article is worth checking out:

May 31, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — New research shows that the coronavirus spike protein from COVID-19 vaccination unexpectedly enters the bloodstream, which is a plausible explanation for thousands of reported side-effects from blood clots and heart disease to brain damage and reproductive issues, a Canadian cancer vaccine researcher said last week.


Bridle, a vaccine researcher who was awarded a $230,000 government grant last year for research on COVID vaccine development, said that he and a group of international scientists filed a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency to get access to what’s called the “biodistribution study.”


The results of this leaked Pfizer study tracing the biodistribution of the vaccine mRNA are not surprising, “but the implications are terrifying,” Stephanie Seneff, a senior research scientist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told LifeSiteNews. “It is now clear” that vaccine content is being delivered to the spleen and the glands, including the ovaries and the adrenal glands.


The high concentration of spike protein found in testes and ovaries in the secret Pfizer data released by the Japanese agency raises questions, too. “Will we be rendering young people infertile?” Bridle asked.

There have been thousands of reports of menstrual disorders by women who had taken a COVID-19 shot, and hundreds of reports of miscarriage in vaccinated pregnant women, as well as of disorders of reproductive organs in men.


Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson did not respond to questions about Bridle’s concerns. Pfizer did not respond to questions about how long the company was aware of its research data that the Japanese agency had released, showing spike protein in organs and tissue of vaccinated individuals.

Now, the interview transcript:

The Spike Protein - Dr. Byram Bridle Professor of Viral Immunology University of Guelph

On Point with Alex Pierson

AP: Let's bring on Dr. Byram Bridle, he's a professor of viral immunology at the University of Guelph.

You've been very open about this entire issue. You're not an anti-vaxxer by any stretch, but what do you think about this inflammation of the heart? Is it an actual threat?

[Spoiler alert: Yes, it is!]

BB: ... Yes, I'm very much pro-vaccine, but always making sure that the science is done properly and that we follow the science carefully before going into public rollout of vaccines.

I hope you let me run with this a little bit, Alex. I'll forewarn you and your listeners, that, um, the story that I'm about to tell is a bit of a scary one. This is cutting edge science. There's a couple of key bits of scientific information that I've become privy to just in the last few days that has made the final link. So we understand now--myself and some key international collaborators--we understand exactly why these problems are happening. And many others associated with these vaccines. And the story is a bit of a scary one, so just to brace you for this.

So I'm just gonna walk you through this. The science that I'm gonna be talking about, I don't have the time here to describe the exact scientific data, but let me assure you--everything that I'm gonna state right now is completely backed up by peer reviewed scientific publications in well known and well respected scientific journals. I have all of this information in hand. I've been in the process of [madly?] trying to put it into a document that I can hopefully circulate widely. So your listeners are going to be the first to hear the public release of this conclusion. So, this is what it is.

The SARS Coronavirus 2 has a spike protein on its surface. That spike protein is what allows it to infect our bodies. That is why we've been using the spike protein in our vaccines--the vaccines we're using get our cells in our body to manufacture that spike protein. If we can mount an immune response against that protein, in theory we can prevent that virus from infecting the body. That's the theory behind the vaccine.

However, when studying the disease, severe Covid-19, everything that you just described--heart problems, lots of problems with the cardio-vascular system, bleeding and clotting--is also associated with severe Covid-19. And doing that research what has been discovered by the scientific community is the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardio-vascular system. If it gets into circulation. Indeed, if you inject the purified spike protein into the blood of research animals they get all kinds of damage to the cardio-vascular system. They can cross the blood - brain barrier and cause damage to the brain.

Now, at first glance that doesn't seem too concerning because we're injecting these vaccines into the shoulder muscle. The assumption, all up until now, has been that these vaccines behave like all of our traditional vaccines--they don't go anywhere other than the injection site. So they stay in our shoulder. Some of the protein will go to the local [draining?] lymph node in order to activate the immune system. 

However, this is where the cutting edge science comes in, this is where it gets scary.

Uh, through a request for information from the Japanese regulatory agency myself and several international collaborators have been able to get access to what's called a bio-distribution study. It's the first time ever that scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination. In other words, is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: ABSOLUTELY NOT. 

It's very disconcerting. The spike protein gets into the blood, circulates through the blood in individuals over several days post vaccination. It accumulates--once it gets into the blood--it accumulates in a number of tissues such as the spleen, the bone marrow, the liver, the adrenal glands. One that's of particular concern for me is that it accumulates in quite high concentrations in the ovaries. 

And then also, a publication that was just accepted for a scientific paper, just accepted for publication, that backs this up, looked at thirteen young health care workers that had received the Moderna vaccine, which is the other messenger RNA vaccine we have in Canada, and they confirm this. They found the spike protein in circulation--so, in the blood--of eleven of those thirteen health care workers that had received the vaccine.

What this means is, we have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation. NOW we have clear cut evidence that the vaccines that make our bodies, the cells in our deltoid muscles, right, manufacture this protein, the vaccine itself plus the protein gets into blood circulation. When in circulation, the spike protein can bind to the receptors that are on our platelets and the cells that line our blood vessels. 

When that happens they can do one of two things. They can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting, and that's exactly why you've been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding. And, of course, the heart's involved. It's part of the cardio-vascular system. That's why we're seeing heart problems. The protein can also cross the blood - brain barrier and cause neurological damage. That's why also in the fatal cases of the blood clots many times they've been in the brain. 

And also of concern is, there's also evidence in a study--this has not yet been accepted for publication, they were trying to show that the antibodies from the vaccine get transferred through breast milk. And the idea was, this may be a good thing because it can confer some passive protections to babies. However, what they found inadvertently was the vaccines, the messenger RNA vaccines, actually get transferred through the breast milk. It was delivering the vaccine vector itself into infants that are breast feeding. Also we now know, if the vaccine gets into circulation, any proteins in the blood will get concentrated in the breast milk. Looking into the adverse even database in the United States [VAERS] we have found evidence of suckling infants experiencing bleeding disorders in the gastro-intestinal tract. So ...

AP: Lemme pause you there ... [cross talk re "freaking a lot of people out"]

BB: So, this has a lot of implications for blood donations. Canadian Blood Services is saying that people who have been vaccinated can donate. We don't want transfer of these pathogenic spike proteins to fragile patients, or being transfused with that blood. 

This has implications for infants that are suckling.

And this has serious implications for people for whom SARS Coronavirus 2 is not a high risk pathogen--and that includes ALL OF OUR CHILDREN. 

In short, the conclusion is, WE MADE A BIG MISTAKE. We didn't realize it until now. We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen. We never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently innoculating people with a toxin. In some people this gets into circulation and when that happens to some people it can cause damage, especially in the cardio-vascular system.

["inadvertent" but nonetheless very real]  

And I have many other legitimate questions about the long term safety, therefore, of this vaccine. For example, with that accumulating in the ovaries one of my questions is, Will we be rendering young people infertile? Some of them infertile? 

Finally, the Youtube:


  1. And I was wondering why so many ufo / water found on mars news have been serviced in the last several days.

  2. Well that should set a few back in their chairs! The blood donation / transfusion issue is terrifying.

  3. Denninger addresses related stuff today, in his usual vivid way. Pt. 1:

    < There was a theory on this I was aware of, but had discarded as extraordinarily (like hit by astroid-level) unlikely. Unfortunately that has now been upgraded in probability to just very unlikely, by the publication of a new paper.

    If the mRNA was to integrate into a man's germ cells, then it's conceivable that said encoding in at least some of his sperm could, depending on exactly how it's integrated, code for spike production in any embryo produced (a woman starts with all the eggs she's going to have at birth, so it won't happen the other way around.) This is very improbable, but now we know, with a new paper, said integration into human cells generally is *not impossible*.
    It may be the explanation for testing PCR-positive even long after recovery; the mRNA got taken up permanently in a few places, and thus produces, at a low level (but not disease-causing) enough nucleotides to produce a PCR+ test, if the Ct is cranked up high enough, possibly permanently.

    There are two possibilities if this happens, one FAR more likely than the other.

    1. Any egg fertilized by that man dies long before birth, as the spike is directly pathogenic in the embryo. It thus causes the embryo, likely before it can implant, but possibly afterward during pregnancy, as the immune system starts to form and react, to inevitably kill the fetus.
    That doesn't make the man "infertile" per-se, but it makes his siring offspring biologically impossible. This is the FAR more probable outcome. Due to the placental barrier, it PROBABLY does not screw the woman involved....


    1. "and thus produces, at a low level (but not disease-causing) enough nucleotides to produce a PCR+ test, if the Ct is cranked up high enough, possibly permanently."

      Yet another possible reason why CDC wants post-vaccination PCR testing to be at 28 CT instead of 40 CT which has been standard pre-vaccine.

  4. 2. The embryo's cells produce the spikes, but it is not killed by them, as the new human's immune system ignores them in the circulation, and thus they don't produce pathology. This is a nightmare scenario, as said human would be a literal "Rogue" from X-Men, since he or she would be *emitting* them from literally *everywhere*; anyone that person comes close to, or in contact with, might be seriously injured or die.
    The mother would probably be able to carry said child, but the infant would be directly *dangerous, to everyone* in the delivery room when it took its first breath, and there'd be no reasonable way (other than by amniotic sampling, which is very dangerous, and can cause a miscarriage) to know it in advance either.
    You'd have to kill that kid, as there would nothing you could do, since the production capacity would literally be encoded, into the DNA in every cell in that human's body, and said child would continually emit spike protein from *every orifice*, on a continual basis -- and be directly biologically dangerous to essentially all other humans. The reverse of "bubble boy", basically.

    #2 is WILDLY improbable but using "vaccine" technology that can potentially integrate into the DNA, which we were told is impossible, is flat out crazyland nuts. The claim, that integration from RNA was impossible, was always bull****, because a huge part of our DNA is in fact of viral origin, and we've known that for a long time.
    Yeah, it took millions of years but so what -- it happened, repeatedly and reasonably often. Simply put proving that the mRNA is not taken up, and potentially integrated by germ cells, was something that was not categorically proved up via animal testing and very limited human testing, before we started doing this crap.
    It is one thing to permanently damage the recipient -- to potentially encode things into offspring is another matter entirely. That's wild-eyed Frankenstein crap, and unbelievably dangerous. The only good news is that, in virtually every case, this sort of thing confers, not hazard to others, but certain death in the human that winds up with it. Mother Nature is a bitch that way.
    The presumption underlying the safety of this approach was that, even if the germ cells DID take up the mRNA the spike produced is harmless. Unfortunately we now know, categorically, that is NOT TRUE, and it is in fact *directly pathogenic*, both on an intact basis, and for the S1 subunit alone.
    As soon as we discovered this, ANY METHOD TO CAUSE PRODUCTION OF THE SPIKE ARTIFICIALLY IN THE BODY VIA RNA, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE METHOD OF DELIVERY, HAD TO BE STOPPED, because IF the second event was possible (reverse-transcription into the DNA), and we KNEW it was due to our genomic history, then the door was open to VERY, VERY BAD THINGS. Very unlikely, but suddenly entirely possible.

    Direct inoculation with KILLED (but NOT attenuated) virus will not present this risk, since uptake of the RNA in the killed virus is impossible, as it cannot undergo cellular fusion. However, and unfortunately, it appears that coronavirus vaccination via such routes does not work (e.g. the Chinese vaccines which are inactivated, and it appears they don't work well if it at all.)

    The odds of this going bad are not very high, and I can't handicap it, as probabilities on this sort of thing are virtually impossible without quite a lot of animal study, none of which we did, but if it does happen, it is REALLY going to suck.

    I do not like the legs of the stool, on which protection from very, very bad outcomes rest being sawed off one at a time, and that's what we keep seeing, at least on a "can happen" basis, as time goes on. >


    1. Follow the mad scientist. Woops! We made a big mistake!

    2. To clarify, these quotes can be most easily found at

  5. Start countdown for Deep State narrative with A/B testing: version A- we have a new covid variant that is proven to damage the cardiovascular system so everyone MUST take the vaccine NOW!!!!; version B- Trump is guilty of a mad and evil plan to kill the human race by putting out a vaccine he KNEW would harm our cardiovascular system and recode our RNA to render our glorious socialists infertile. Anyone associated with Trump must be jailed etc...

    Watch very carefully for how Big Media, Big Tech, and the Uniparty decide to message this. I guarantee there are fevered talks going on now to "get ahead of this thing." How they message tells you how dangerous it is to their survival (ie their perception of threat).

    Basic options: 1) deny deny attack credibility double down on safety of shots etc; 2) stall for time, push ambiguity, promise thorough investigations etc..; 3) if too late for 1 and 2, feign outrage and righteous anger and find convenient, unimportant people as scapegoats or, better yet, TRUMP!!!! He really IS Hitler and Dr Mengele in one and we must lockdown to prevent vaccinated people from infecting the rest of us.

    I'm sure there are other options but the one chosen will reflect how seriously the bad guys feel threatened by this development.


  6. Okay now so I can warn my loved ones not unduly can anybody explain whether these godforsaken spike proteins remain in the body only for a period or for forever, or is it just the antibodies that remain? Surely Dr. Fauci knows. Mark A

  7. This may not have been a surprise to everyone. Remember that Bill Gates devoted a highly unusual amount of time and money to the vax effort. Bill Gates is also a population control advocate. Coincidence?

  8. The BIGGER question now is will HCQ or Ivermectin be effective against the mRNA spike preotein??

  9. I don't mean this to be negative in any way.
    But if I didn't stop by the blog once in a while I would never have known any of this. But I felt it, in my gut, since the beginning. Why I didn't get the vax, just following my gut feeling on it.


  11. Fantastic discussion between Dr. Pierre Kory and biologist Brett Weinstein regarding Ivermectin and its suppression as a Covid therapy — which is called out as “The Crime of the Century” in the video title. Wonder how long YT will leave it up.

    1. I listened to the first part. I found the discussion about the state of medical "culture" quite telling. And depressing.

    2. Yeah, esp. the stuff on how docs are now just stenographers, or some such.

  12. From Denninger today, on MSM, ads etc., at

    What other averred facts has the media -- and big tech -- done the same thing with?
    Masks? Lockdowns? PCR Testing? Asymptomatic transmission? Droplets .vs. Aerosols?
    All of these have had hard science published, showing that what the media has run were bull**** at the time they did so, and not one retraction has come. Even now when the data is conclusive; lockdown .vs. not, and the curves in both places, the CDC itself documenting less than a 2% transmission difference by their claims for masks, across eight viral replication cycles, which means the efficiency of the policy in preventing someone from getting infected was less than 0.3% (1.003 ^ 8), we knew RSV and other respiratory viruses were nearly all in aerosols five years ago, and we also know on the base physics that, unless you have a 100% seal, aerosols go right around the edges of whatever you're wearing -- and because when you exhale, you pressurize the interior volume source control cannot work, as the seal is broken with each exhale.
    Never mind the meatpacking plant in Germany, where everyone was masked, and the masks did nothing -- reported out in formal study, in the early summer of 2020!

    How about early treatment and intervention?
    HCQ/Doxycycline or Zpak/Zinc? Ivermectin? Budesonide? Others?
    All have shown some efficacy. Remdesivir, on the other hand, only usable in a hospital, has shown none in a very large trial (Solidarity.)
    Whadda 'ya mean, there are no studies? What do you call those three links above, and why were they not offered to patients every single time? Why doesn't the *person who has* a disease get to choose?

    There is highly-credible evidence behind early treatment, which began in the first few months of the outbreak; Florida near Palm Beach with Ivermectin, Michigan's Henry Ford Hospital System with HCQ, a doctor in Texas with Budesonide, a confirmatory study on that run out of Australia, and then very *large populations* that have used them, such as India and Mexico City, with several nations and provinces within nations telling the ghouls to stuff it over the last few months, when the other path, relying on vaccines and expensive on-patent drugs like Remdesivir in the hospitals, did not stop the infections and death.

    You want to know, why Twitter *doesn't like people talking* about those things?
    Ever look at *their ads* on their mobile app? *Half of them* are from pharma companies, advocating this or that brand new, expensive drug. Gee, no problem there, right?
    Watch TV? How many pharma ads do you see there?
    Ever see an ad for an off-patent, cheap drug for something?
    You never have, and never will -- there's no money in it.
    Why to know, why there's a *sub-area* under, on which this article appears? Because Google's *Adsense* throws a piss-fit, whenever I publish an article on Covid-19, that isn't cheerleading for everything they want, so in order keep from having to completely suppress those articles off the "top page" of The Market Ticker, I set up this second area, where there is *no advertising* at all. Isn't that rather Orwellian of the so-called "media"?

    What if the truth is that, these new-fangled things we're doing now had exactly *nothing* to do, with the virus abating in the US? You do know that's a reasonable hypothesis, right? After all the vaccines *never went into enough* arms to do anything until the case rate had peaked.

  13. I keep watching the MSM and Alt MSM waiting for this story to gain some traction... Mostly hoping for the less talk show friendly and more sciencey version to break a little ground.

    The roaches are still doing a pretty good job of blocking out the sunlight apparently.

  14. Since this is an artifact of the virus itself, and only of the vaccine because it mimics the virus, was this a population control bomb? This would explain why China, who historically has had severe problems with population control, would allow it to spread.

    Bill Gates has also heavily involved himself with COVID, and until now there was no easy explanation why...