This article appeared yesterday at the Epoch Times. If a former medical school professor, a current Pfizer board member, and former head of the FDA--that's all one person--is openly saying that natural immunity needs to be included in policy discussions, does that signal that the wheels are coming off the establishment narrative of the Covid Regime? The person in question is Scott Gottlieb, and he specifically cites the recent Israeli study everyone's been talking about:
Pfizer Board Member: ‘Natural Immunity’ Against COVID-19 Needs to Be Included in Policy Discussions
Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, who is also a Pfizer board member, noted that “natural immunity” gained from a prior COVID-19 infection needs to be included in discussions about virus-related policies and mandates.
“The balance of the evidence demonstrates that natural immunity confers a durable protection,” Gottlieb said during an Aug. 30 interview, referring to a landmark new preprint Israeli study that found that prior COVID-19 infection confers more protection against the virus than any of the vaccines. “It’s fair to conclude that.”
Although Gottlieb said he would “be careful” about concluding whether natural immunity provides better protection against transmitting the virus, officials “should start assimilating that into our policy discussions.”
“Natural infection confers robust and durable immunity,” he said, citing the Israeli study and others.
Last week, researchers from Maccabi Healthcare and Tel Aviv University said that individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 had superior protection against the Delta variant of the CCP virus compared to those who received the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, the most commonly used shot in Israel.
“This analysis demonstrated that natural immunity affords longer-lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease, and hospitalization due to the Delta variant,” the study reads, noting that the findings came from the “largest real-world observational study” in the world.
Support from a figure like Gottlieb is important for a reset of the narrative. The feeling is hard to shake--the establishment is on the defensive.
Of course, the study is flawed because it's only an observational study.ReplyDelete
What we really need is a carefully constructed and executed RCT study. Once that info is in hand, say 12-18 months from now, then we can begin to consider it.
Via Dr. Malone's twitter feed this afternoon I became aware of this forthcoming book Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey. It's scheduled to be released on September 20th, but those who pre-order receive a PDF copy of the manuscript today.ReplyDelete
I bought it and downloaded the form egg 700 page PDF. I’m only a quarter way through it but it’s pretty fascinating. And just for the record I don’t get paid for plugging this book.Delete
Just noticed that the Malone tweet that leads you to Dr. Breggin's video and link to buy his book are gone as of this morning:Delete
This was the link that was in the tweet:
Or maybe this is a way to have the narrative evolve in such a way that they don't lose complete credibility and maintain their audience.ReplyDelete
Yep, this is exactly how information wars are fought. The bad guys put out the disinformation, ex. jabs are 99% effective and our only hope for normality etc.. The good guys start exposing the lies, slowly getting the word out while the baddies fight nack to discredit and censor. If the lies start to lose their hold on the territory of public opinion then the bad guys make a strategic retreat-- concede that maaaaaybe natural immunity is an option buuuut--- and then continue to push out fresh lies to confuse and distract.ReplyDelete
One of the primary goals in an info war is to avoid a full blown defeat, a rout. Retreat, regroup, flank but never allow the truth to be fully and widely understood.