Pages

Thursday, December 10, 2020

SWC's Must Read Hunter Biden Prediction

Let's get Shipwreckedcrew's prediction out of the way first thing:


My Prediction: If Joe Biden Is Sworn in, the Investigation of Hunter Biden Will Lead to Joe's Resignation


I think most us who have been following the Hunter Biden story won't be surprised at such a prediction. In fact, given that if the Dems really end up pulling off their Election Hoax we know whatever administration ensues will be Obama 2.0, and given the further fact that we know Obama has no use for Biden anyway, it follows that they key word in that title just might be "If". Someone is wasting no time in exposing a ton of Biden baggage to public view, well in advance of any inauguration. Heck, Biden hasn't even made it to president elect, yet! Who really believes that the liberal media, having dutifully covered up for Biden Inc. during the election, has suddenly developed a conscience? Me neither. These revelations--revelations to low info Dem voters, anyway--look very much like messages to Biden Inc.: Start making plans for your future, and don't include a Pennsylvania Ave. address in those plans.

Here's the thing, though. That scenario envisions a President Kama Sutra--something few Dem voters really bargained for. Not in the sense of really processing the implications through their skulls. These switcheroo gimmicks rarely work out as envisioned, and we know Obama isn't exactly a political genius. So prospects for any sort of happy ending for the Dems from their Election Hoax are fading.

That's my prediction, if this scenario plays out as SWC believes it will.

Now, here's why SWC's article is a must read.

What SWC does is explain very lucidly the implications of the announcement yesterday that Hunter Biden is the subject of some sort of "tax" related investigation. In Delaware, by the local US Attorney there.

What that really means is that there is some significant criminal investigation going on into Hunter Biden--and his taxes are only one part of that. That's because investigations that are "tax only" investigations are not handled by a local US Attorney--so there's likely much more under investigation.

However, that 'much more' almost certainly involves the movement of money--internationally, since that's how Hunter Biden made his money. Or rather, made money for Biden Inc., since all evidence--and it's pretty strong evidence--is that Joe and brother Jim are involved.

That being the case, the investigators--both FBI and IRS--will be going over Biden Inc.'s financial records with a fine toothed comb. The betting here is that if there was ever a chance that those finances would hold up to serious scrutiny, Hunter Biden would never have received a "target" letter.

The result--readily foreseeable--is that Joe Biden is highly unlikely to make it through a first term, even if his mental deterioration can be hidden from public view.

Read the article--I'm sure you'll find it very informative. I spent some years doing those kinds of investigation, and I can tell you that that's exactly how they proceed. Once they get going they don't stop. If Hunter got a "target" letter, that can only mean they've already found some pretty good evidence.

Think what that tells you about Donald J. Trump. He has to be the only politician in DC who could come through the type of scrutiny he received from Team Mueller smelling pretty much like a rose.

Much of this may be news to us, but it surely isn't to Trump. With civil war on the Left breaking out, as it appears, and the GOP appearing to close ranks with Trump, things could get pretty interesting. Trouble ahead, a lady in red--things could get pretty wild if this train keeps heading down these tracks. The Left could end up eating a major portion of Trumpenfreude.

UPDATE: Hunter Biden Criminal Probe Bolsters Chinese Scholar's Claim Of Beijing Infiltrating 'Top Of America's Core'

Very long article. Sample:


Moreover, Biden’s top appointees thus far overwhelmingly have massive ties to Wall Street and the industries which spend the most to control the U.S. government. As but one egregious example, Pine Island Investment Corp. — an investment firm in which key Biden appointees including Secretary of State nominee Antony Blinken and Pentagon chief nominee Gen. Lloyd Austin have been centrally involved — “is seeing a surge in support from Wall Street players after pitching access to investors.”


50 comments:

  1. Wasn't Harris named on some of Hunter's financial docs, too? If Xiden has to resign, possibly why not she(her?), as well? Good Lord, that would pave the way for POTUS Pelosi, unless this investigation drags out and the GOP takes the House. Just spitballin' here, and I think I threw up a little in my mouth....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Trump has always said the drop date is Jan 6.
    Ratcliffe's report is due on the 18th of Dec.
    There is much more of the story to be told and lived.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Executive Order 13848 (issued September 12, 2018) directions the Director of National Intelligence to issue a report within 45 days of the election:

      he Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.

      Delete
    2. EO 13848 threat assessment report

      Delete
  3. Criminal Joe gets a pass on breaking laws, President Trump is crucified for attempting tp clean up a tsunami type disaster. God Bless you Mr. President.

    ReplyDelete
  4. KH does not pass Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

    Neither parent was a citizen at her birth!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But wasn't she born in the USA, Oakland CA?

      Delete
    2. That's okay for citizenship. Not for the Presidency.

      Delete
    3. So...see Malcolm. Her parents weren't naturalized as citizens at that time. Here legally or illegally, for some reason we grant citizenship to anyone making it here. Jindal and Rubio weren't eligible, either. Same reason, their parents were citzens of another country...and so were they citizens of elsewhere at their birth, too. Just have to be a 2nd generation American to be eligible.

      Delete
    4. I predict approximately 0% chance of that angle gaining any traction.

      Delete
    5. The way our country treats our Constitution we dont act on any transgressions!

      Delete
    6. It is not where you were born, but who you were born to, I remember Obama trying to say McCain was not eligable because his parents were both natural born americans. Her parents are neither.


      Rob S

      Delete
  5. IMHO only reason KommieLa was put on the ticket was @ Obama’s behest. She was a total zero in the primary & couldn’t gain traction. The two though are in simpatico ideologically. He was always the designate, not Biden. Matter of fact few months ago maligNancy was talking a lot about the 25th Amendment. Rush keenly observed that that was directed @ Biden, not Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly right. Remember, Harris couldn't draw enough support to make into the Iowa Caucus....in fact, I think I remember an article in Breitbart that there were 15 candidates in the DEM primary who outlasted her. Including Marianne Williamson (Who?) and 'Spartacus' Booker.

      The reality is Kamala was never top tier to anyone* but the establishment.

      Delete
  6. I would say that if Biden is sworn in there will not be any investigations. They will simply be crushed as openly, carelessly and worry free as every other historical investigation that has taken place since the Nixon adminstration.

    Unless your name is Trump...

    I think someone should sit down and put a full list of criminal cases involving political characters that have fallen under investigation and look at the outcomes between forgotten vs acted upon.

    It would be sobering!

    We have THE WORST amnesia about these types of things.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't see how it's possible for Hunter Biden to escape Federal sentencing, or how this works out for ANY of the Bidens.

    Between declassified, public facing documents, first hand sworn testimony...there is too much in public view to make disappear.

    If Hunters personality makeup is what it appears to be, he may try cutting deals to avoid 25 years in the big house. Will he turn on his pop? Hmmmm.....

    Dave

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see a drug overdose in Hunter's future,


      Rob S

      Delete
    2. Bingo on HRC, WJC, the whole Clinton foundation. Anyone recall Chinese nuclear secrets?

      Or maybe fast and furious?

      IRS spying?

      How about the SSCI leaking classified documents?

      Maybe Spygate?

      All had tons of publicly released documents and witnesses, etc and yet?

      Burying Hunter would be a walk in the park.

      Delete
  8. I figured they were releasing it now, so it’s”old news” during Biden’s potential term.

    If the parties were reversed, I would say it’s the current administration kneecapping the next.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Agreed; this was all by design. President Harris. Yuck.

    ReplyDelete
  10. In most cases with democrats, they walk away with full pensions and a book deal. Gotta think the publishers are lined up.

    ReplyDelete
  11. President Harris, yes, but as a Progressive, not so much. Harris is there to protect Silicon Valley and all the implies. It was the giant Silicon Valley tech firms that won, such as it is, this election for the Democrats, and they didn't do it for Social Justice, BLM, and the transexual lobby; they did it for cheap labor, favorable tax structures, and government-protected monopolies.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Remember when Obama warned Biden that he doesn't have to do this?

    It was probably gold-digger Dr. Jill that forced Joes hand.

    Loser!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Biden may drop out before the inauguration, in return for which Harris will pardon Hunter and the other scuzzy Bidens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There won't be any convictions for Kamala to pardon by the inauguration. I could see Joe trying to hang in long enough to pardon Hunter once he is convicted though, just before he totters off to shoot "Weekend at Bernie's III"

      Delete
    2. Presidential pardons don't require prior conviction. The offense is pardoned, not the conviction/sentence.

      The president cannot pardon future offenses, only past. And he pardon violations state or local laws.

      Delete
    3. Correction! Mark, can you please edit this? The last sentence above should of course read:
      And he CAN'T pardon violations of state or local laws.

      Delete
  14. Perhaps Trump has a bit more up his sleeve...to be dropped over the next week or so, e.g. proof or at least strong innuendo of Biden's complicity in the l'affaire China. Then SCOTUS hands Texas et al a big win and sends the election back to Congress.

    The state legislators are faced with a second term for Trump or voting for an exceedingly corrupt Biden.

    Mohawk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There have been an exceeding number of signs that the administration posesses more information on election shenanigans than it is currently letting on. Is it in the interest of "national security" to not reveal fully what is known or to reveal it?

      Delete
    2. Meant: sends the election back to state legislatures

      Mohawk

      Delete
    3. Yes, I think there is some serious national security stuff that is classified too high for public discussion and Trump's trying to avoid it right now to see how the SC case goes.

      Delete
    4. Along those lines, see this.

      Delete
  15. Are any fbi, cia, doj employees willing to man up and pull those departments out of the porcelain throne?

    ReplyDelete
  16. It has just been reported that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has joined the Texas suit. If so, it will be extremely difficult for the Democrats to make a "lack of standing" argument in their quest to have the suit summarily dismissed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not the PA House as an institution, but rather a majority of the GOP members.
      And, likewise, a a majority of the GOP members in DC, see
      https://thehill.com/homenews/house/529717-100-house-republicans-sign-brief-backing-texas-suit-challenging-election .

      Delete
    2. It's also been reported 22 Democrat State AG's have joined the troubled 4 too.

      Delete
    3. Imagine if Jim Biden get's busted and thrown under the bus he'll ask for a plea deal to implicate his nephew and brother. Bon bon's and cherry coke time.

      Delete
  17. Something interesting from Rick Grenell tonight about chinese connections to mayor's and governors on the near horizon.

    https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/how-far-does-swalwell-spying-go-richard-grenell/

    I'm thinking back to Harris being on Hunter Biden's "go to" list of business contacts in his laptop fiasco.

    I wonder if the DNI report coming isn't going to carry much more on foreign interference than most expect it to?

    ReplyDelete
  18. AP went after Justice Thomas' wife in Oct 2020. She had some thoughts about Hunter on her FB page.

    And of course Justice Thomas had his own issues with them.

    Payback time?

    https://twitter.com/sethjlevy/status/1337240896388165634

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
  19. LOVE the Great full Dead reference!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Mark, this came up on Epoch Times. It's very interesting that this hasn't been brought to light earlier. It's been quite clear from the beginning of Trump's time in the White House.

    Former Special Forces Officer Warns of Color Revolution Tactics Used Against Trump https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/former-special-forces-officer-warns-of-color-revolution-tactics-used-against-trump_3612952.html

    K***C

    ReplyDelete
  21. From now on, I will call him Uday "Hunter" Biden.

    ReplyDelete
  22. AG William Barr reportedly hid two federal probes into Hunter Biden for months

    https://nypost.com/2020/12/11/william-barr-hid-two-federal-probes-into-hunter-biden-for-months/

    Bill McGurn on Fox News as I type this: (paraphrased) “It is not the job of the DoJ to leak investigations…"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can agree with that: “It is not the job of the DoJ to leak investigations…"

      Delete
    2. How convenient to blame Barr when the media and everyone on the Other Side contended that there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Hunter, Joe and the clan. Even when evidence, Hunter’s laptop and then Bobulinski came to light, they still said “no evidence”. “Smear job." Now that it ihas been put out there by Hunter himself - in a tiny step about taxes - and then clarified and expanded by others, the media are scrambling to make Barr the scapegoat. Won’t work. Or shouldn’t work. The gullible and the Barr haters will slurp it up with gusto… but that’s what they do.

      Delete
    3. Didn't McCarthy over at NR have a fog-horn headline a few weeks back "A Collusion Tale: China and the Bidens"....and...."Not only were the Bidens’ Chinese business contacts known to have ties to the regime; they also ***may have been clandestine agents***. Hell, that was from RIGHT before the election...

      Dave

      Delete