I'm not mathematician, so I can't explain this. I'll let the Twitter threads speak for themselves--with a hat tip to TGP, where I found this.
You may recall that an Ivy League math professor, Steven J. Miller, previously testified about statistical anomalies in the Pennsylvania vote. Later, a "mathematician and expert witness" testified for the Trump campaign in Arizona, again pointing out statistical anomalies. This second mathematician is named Bobby Piton, but I've been unable to come up with his bio quickly. Twitter suspended Piton for his AZ testimony. At any rate, Piton has now examined the PA and GA votes from a rather novel perspective--a statistical analysis of Last Names. His research--if I understand it correctly--indicates that votes were deducted in PA. LOTS of votes.
What follows is my editing of Piton's new Twitter thread, which explains his analysis of the PA vote. That is followed by his conclusions which correlate PA and GA. See what you make of it. My understanding of what he's saying about PA--and I may be mistaken--goes like this:
Piton identified 521,879 Last Names that were used in the PA vote. Of those, 47% belong to "one and only one person." So Piton then looked at the names that had multiple persons attached to them. By looking at just the 1000 most common Last Names and discovered that there were nearly 700K fewer of these people who voted than statistics would project. That's a pretty huge anomaly.
Based on what he discovered, Piton concludes:
Based on my findings a sophisticated State Actor was able to optimize a desired outcome for both the State of Georgia and the State of Pennsylvania.
OK, so first we have Piton's summary of his PA findings:
I have some absolutely Stunning News to report regarding PA.
I examined just over 9,008,753 records and have identified 521,879 unique Last Names.
245,033 or just under 47% of the total Last Names in PA only belong to 1 and only 1 person! Once again, no brothers, sisters, aunts, cousins, parents that share this particular last name out of 9 Million records.
Upon looking at the TOP 1000 Last Names in PA, I have discovered that PA has 695,430 Fewer People in the top 1000 Last Names.
Literally, there are
- 14,776 fewer Smiths, than should be there.
- 19,591 Williams have gone missing,
- 30,830 Johnson's are no where to be found.
- 11,656 Jacksons went MIA.
What in the world is going on in PA? Exactly 500 of the top 1000 names in PA have a deficit in the number of people that should be there.
The Tally for these 500 Negative Names (below Nationwide Estimate) is 958,044. This is astounding 695,000 to 958,000 just got up and vanished out of PA. President Trump, I have a breakdown by Last Name of all of the people that have been gone missing.
I am a loss for words that I am looking at such INSANE Outright Fraud. That almost 1 million Americans had their Vote STOLEN from them! Arrests need to be made for this crime against the Great State of Pennsylvania.
Next, we look at Piton's conclusions, in which he correlates the PA voting results with those in GA and suggests that there was coordination between the two states. Please don't ask me how that works!
Please have someone check all of my work immediately regarding PA and GA. Based on my findings a sophisticated State Actor was able to optimize a desired outcome for both the State of Georgia and the State of Pennsylvania. I'm showing the Shortage in PA almost perfectly offsetting the Overage in GA on the top 100 Last Names (2 million voting records)
Once this is confirmed.. you will have the proverbial smoking gun of ForeignElectionInterference @GenFlynn @robert_spalding
When taking the top 100 Names in PA, you will find there are about 440,000 LAST Names from what is suggested there should be based on National Data (they went "missing" or were deleted). Meanwhile in GA, you have an offsetting amount of 428,000 MORE Last Names than should exist (when you adjust the numbers for relative population size of PA and GA).
With over 2 Million People Combined in 2 different States, the differential is -12,000 = 6/10 of 1%.
-440,000 Shortage PA
+428,000 Overage GA
=-12,000 or 6/10 of 1%.
Running the correlation between Last Names in PA, 1000 Names, vs those Same Last Names in GA, you get a negative -42.38%. The reason it isn't higher is because some of the Last Names in PA that don't make the top 100 names in GA.
Please pray... things might get very dangerous!
I quit mathematics at an early age before I suffered permanent brain damage - thankfully. But this looks like confirmation of our belief that the election of Basement Joe was not quite kosher.ReplyDelete
Not many Stoltzfus in GeorgiaReplyDelete
It should be pretty straightforward to compare the list he used consisting of 9 Million names of voters, to a database combining PA citizens' records from health, driver license, utility invoices etc.ReplyDelete
It can be done in a matter of minutes with modern database tools.
If it shows there are 700 thousand mismatches, PA election is invalid. People might claim the 9 million voters list used is inaccurate, or any number of other excuses, but 700 K is too big of a steaming pile to cover. There can be no explanation other than fraud.
Read this earlier at TGP. Piton was used in AZ to provide his analysis. What's that gotten us so far? Now he analyzes the PA data and says he's also compared similar to GA. Question is where does this information go and to whom? Are any judges asking for it? That would be a No. Are any state legislatures asking for it? That would be a No. Are any state election officials (SoS's) asking for it? That would be a No.ReplyDelete
The only possible relief may come from the Intelligence agencies report. If these agencies provide similar data "alignment" to Piton across different facets AND can show Foreign interference then perhaps momentum can be established. I'm skeptical at this stage.
It may help, if Piton could compare this year's data with '16 or '12.Delete
It has been determined that this is going to be rammed through regardless of what the peasantry thinks about it. That the Cloud People would undertake this to begin with demonstrates in what regard they hold the opinion of Dirt People.Delete
Who are you going to complain to. No who feels answerable to the Titans, which is everyone with real power, is even going to listen.
Quite right, Cardigan, as far as no one caring in two of the three branches.Delete
As far as remedy...it will be the military or a CCP supported Demokrazi feudalism. If Trump doesn't pull the trigger it will be a nasty slide towards Venezuela.
Piton has the green curtains open and it appears simple checks will reveal unimaginable fraud to the average bear. Pure evil! Break the plotters, their scheme, and provide full truth or society breaks downReplyDelete
Interesting use if term “state actor”.ReplyDelete
It refers to someone working for a government institution / body.
Why is no one pursuing an examination of the ballots ? Jovan Pulitzer, inventor of QR code, says his software can detect fake ballots quickly :ReplyDelete
It can tell if the signature/ballot markings are ink or printed. If ballots were folded (mailed) or not. It can tell if the ballot came from China or an unauthorized place.
Why aren't we doing this ?
The American people aren't demanding it?Delete
Locked down, brainwashed and misinformed.
@ B Mclaurine, the ballots, those that remain in some readable form, are in the hands of the people who committed the fraud. You will have to pry them out of their cold dead fingers.Delete
I'm curious about Pulitzer myself. By now, of course, the ballots his technique would reveal as fraudulent have been suitably doctored, or destroyed. What a circus.
I think I get the math but I don’t understand how he ties this to a State Actor or Foreign Interference?ReplyDelete
Right. I would normally associate the term "State Actor" with a foreign country. However, perhaps he's referring to officials of the States in question: PA and GA.Delete
I took it to mean that this lengthy process of injecting new names into the voter rolls would have taken a fairly large level of work and coordination, not just some late night DNC operative tossing a few in the pile or pyre.Delete
Hello from Austria,Delete
Following this mess in your election for many weeks now. Bobby Piton means, that someone has opened or made the database availabe to a third party to get the names in - to get them a vote and to get them out again - after the vote. Pollworkers were simply used in their simple minded hate against Trump. Regards, Carmen
rip Phil NiekroReplyDelete
Sad day for baseball.Delete
If judges don't want to look at the evidence and the Supreme Court doesn't want to get involved, what can possibly be done. The Democrats will continue to deny everything. Comments on Twitter or wherever have this remark These comments are considered untrue. The Democrats are more concerned with Georgia. Win the Senate races in Georgia, then they can continue with the destruction of America.ReplyDelete
This won't do Trump any good. If true, it's beyond galling. But he's out of time and who would he go to? The SC? Questions (if the steal happened as alleged here and elsewhere): who organized it? The coordination looks terrific, well-planned. Names? Places?ReplyDelete
We have to look to the future. One goal we all share is that this fraud, again, if it occurred, is documented and explained, if for no other reason than to demonstrate that DJT isn't crazy.
Sidebar: Trump's reelection team wasn't simply caught flat-footed; they were decapitated.
However, Trump is systematically discrediting the institutions that betrayed the nation in this election.Delete
If that discrediting of the institutions leads to any real change, from where would the change come, other than from the army, as happened in Spain in 1936, Greece in 1967, Chile in 1973, Turkey in 1960, '71, and '80, etc.?Delete
It's hard to believe that the army will step in, until DJT stresses, that the institutions are betraying the nation to such a degree, that the Deplorables stand to be all-but outright liquidated, if the institutions aren't dis-empowered.Delete
I can't believe you're saying that. The military in this country is among the most Woke institutions we have. Be careful what you wish for.Delete
I agree with Mark. The command organization, anyone above O-3, will fall in Blue. Vindman/Mattis were not flukes. The good news is there are no Pattons, Lees, or Jacksons among them; being educated to management rather than leadership.Delete
"educated to management rather than leadership"Delete
Totally. If you don't get that you'll never understand our country as it is. It's why they hate Trump so much. He tries to lead.
"among the most Woke institutions we have."Delete
My understanding is, that is so, in most field grade ranks.
I was thinking about EMs & NCOs, the latter of whom have long been the backbone of the army.
And, I'd not be shocked, if these Es could find some Os, to assist in purging the Woke Os.
"management rather than leadership".Delete
If the Es ever decide to blow off their managers, (e.g. under "old-fashioned" O-2 leaders), the
managers could quickly end up over their (and w/o their) heads.
Please recall, my premise here wasDelete
"*until* DJT stresses, that the institutions are betraying the nation...."
DJT just caved by signing the Porkulus.Delete
Brutal, insofar as his appeals to the public had *any* chance, to reduce the (apparent) veto-proof majority.Delete
"245,033 or just under 47% of the total Last Names in PA only belong to 1 and only 1 person!"ReplyDelete
If you go to all this trouble to expose something is wrong, why not enlighten us all and share who that person is??
I get there is stuff that does not add up, but this does not help me to see how it would have worked to throw this election.
This is just too vague.
I don't think that is what he means. He means that 200k + last names are standalone without any near, or apparent extended, familial connections. Not that they are literally a single name. But I might be the one misinterpreting this passage. I to thought it somewhat less that clear.Delete
I agree, Tom. I think what he is saying is that it is statistical impossible for there to be that many unique names in the state. Almost everyone has some kind of family relations and often enough living in the same state.Delete
Hi from Austria,Delete
If I may contribute here too. Correct one person with no relative. In AZ or NV Piton also could show that 23 000 people shared i.e. one phone number. The fraud is so obvious, that we in Europe ( although not those watching MSM ) are stunned, shocked and hopeing for a good end at your side of the ocean.
As long as there is no will to investigate these claims by federal or state authorities this will go no where. The absence of any interest by the Bureau or DOJ has confirmed that nothing has changed.ReplyDelete
Thanks, different perspective as in 245k unique names only appearing once. Ok, makes more sense then.
Still, if they are so unique, Piton should have provided us a sample listing of them to illustrate what he is talking about, they should be real strange names?
One would think so, but the statistical anomaly of the "Smith/Jones" deficit is also very strange. Would love to hear a lawyer explain that away.Delete
I don't have a clue what Piton's point is.ReplyDelete
Just sayin' in case anybody else feels this way.
Piton's tweets are so cryptic, it is hard to see a real thread of how some systematic fraud was committed based on his discoveries. How did he establish the statistics he claims validating his observations. To state: "14,776 fewer Smiths, than should be there" is just that, a statement. Without any attribution / sourcing, it cannot be challenged or validated.ReplyDelete
Interesting research though, but it needs to be flushed out with a lot more detail, for it to make sense, and have any influence.
I do believe there was massive BS in this election.
Hi from Austria,Delete
correct. You say BS, as stastic person works out on numbers and finds statistic anomalies, by giving certain conditions. Either way, your BS and Pitons statistic work indicates serious Voter Fraud, Election Fraud. And if your judges, represantatives and FBI would be working as they are supposed to by law, they would look into it and confirm the fraud, or would proof that it was an anomaly. But nothing of that kind is done. - Which prooves that your Deep State is far deeper than any would or could imagine. Get those people out of office, go on the street and call them. Let them hear your voice. You are the sovereign... you give them the power... You are WE the People! -- Best regards Carmen
Hope you are stocking up on 2nd amendment supplies. We are probably going to need themReplyDelete
Mark - intriguing comment and would make a great blog post if you elaborated on your thoughts on the impact in the future. Trump has a purpose if he’s being systematic...ReplyDelete
mark wauckDecember 28, 2020 at 7:25 AM
>However, Trump is systematically discrediting the
>institutions that betrayed the nation in this election.
I'm simply saying that the events of this year have dispelled the US government's aura of legitimacy--certainly for a sizeable share of the population, those who understand that a major election was simply stolen and that both parties are pretty much on board with that. Couple that with the corrupt spending bill shenanigans and the failure of SCOTUS to act it's role. What that means is that a possibly critical mass of the population will at least be open to radical remedies if some credible person/group presents that as an option.Delete
My guess on whom / what Trump has discredited:Delete
1. Higher education
2. Critical race proponents
3. Court system bring non political
4. Free speech support by internet giants
7. CDC / FDA / so called scientists
8. Democratic Governors
9. FBI / DOJ
11. Me too
12. Fox News
13. China’s panda mask
14. Professional sports - nba / nfl
15. Globalism is good
16. Free trade is fair trade
17. A border wall is useless
18. Supporters of overseas wars / engagement
19. Foreign party establishment
20. All immigration is good
21. Elections in the US are fraud free.
22. Deregulation is impossible
23. Us can’t be energy independent
24. Republicans can’t fight back and win
Trump has decimated the Democratic farm teams, much as Obama did.
Trump has changed the Overton Windows in so many areas. He has discredited institutions right and left. I don’t think we will have radical remedies, but I do expect major changes for the better. Trump has done a huge service by showing how corrupt, incompetent, hypocritical, and biased so many institutions are. Seeing the true state is the first step improvements.
Yeah, beeing the true state is the first step improvements, assuming that events are allowed to take their natural course.Delete
Alas, the DS will have huge leash, to ensure the Dem brass that their "natural course" will, if necessary, be liquidated.
Typo: SEEing the true state....Delete
BREAKING: Pennsylvania Certified Results for President Are Found in Error – The Error Is Twice the Size of the Difference Between CandidatesReplyDelete
The Pennsylvania House has just uncovered that the certified results in Pennsylvania for President are in error by more than 200,000 votes. This is more than twice the difference between President Trump and Joe Biden.
At this point, the only point is to give an ideological ally Senator Kennedy (LA), Senator Blackburn (TN), or Senator Tuberville (AL) enough political cover to go along with Mo Brooks' plan. This needs to be focus. Someone from a reliably red state that won reelection this cycle. Bill Cassidy (LA), Cindy Hyde Smith (MS), Mike Rounds (SD), Bill Hagerty (TN), Shelly Moore Capito (WV), Cynthia Lummis (WY).ReplyDelete
And then what? Each branch will have 2 hours to decide if they agree with the challenge of a few senators? Not gonna happen I'm afraid, the way to help Trump.ReplyDelete
I have a high level science degree and am having trouble following the argument. Can someone restate in normal English what Piton claims to have discovered and how?ReplyDelete
I think he is making statistical points. Statistically that is there should be more voters with the last name smith having voted in Pennsylvania than the record shows actually did. While at the same time there is an unusually high number of uniquely occurring last names, which suggests fraud in that the votes of real actual me and ms smiths was replaced with fake votes of me and ms umptyfratz who will coveniently never check up on or inquire about how they're vote was recorded (for biden) because they don't exist.ReplyDelete
Thanks Mark. I understand your point about an unusually high number of unique last names. I do not understand how there should be more "Smith" voter nor what "the top 1000 names" means.ReplyDelete
I'm not sure the confusion is my stupidity, the stupidity of Twitter, or the poster. The language is all so opaque.