One of Sidney Powell's central claims has been that vote tabulations nationwide--not just in a few "swing" states--were manipulated by means of software. Without having any expertise in statistics my seat of the pants view has been that that makes sense--incredible as it may seem. It just seems too difficult to explain the apparent anomalies any other way. Now, that doesn't mean that no efforts were made to paper over this fraud by the use of more traditional means of voter fraud--only that those means would have been applied after the fact as a matter of necessity. In other words, the argument is that the Trump/Red wave was so large that it threatened to overwhelm the pre-planned fraud, and seat of the pants measures were then taken to compensate for that.
This morning at American Thinker I read an interesting article that presents what appear to be clear anomalies in the Virgina vote count. I took particular note of this because Virginia is one of the "non-swing" states concerning which I have harbored suspicions.
Here is the presentation of the facts:
This is the first example of a data issue for Virginia. We see the vote totals decrease twice over the space of 18 minutes. The time stamps for the decrease are 05:12 and 05:30. (Remember, this is the UTC time reported in the JSON files used by the MSM.)
Date Hr Min
What does this indicate? Of the first 3.6 million votes cast, 765,215, 19.3%, were removed from the total over the course of 18 minutes. I find it interesting that we reviewed something similar in the Pennsylvania analysis.
Another interesting item is that from 11040538 to 11040634, we see 107,779 votes counted in 56 minutes. I use this to establish a baseline. If we look ahead from 11040538 to 11040634, we observe that the pace picked up to 395,771 in 45 minutes. This translates into approximately 1,924 ballots per minute from 11040538 to 11040634, and then a sudden increase to 8,795 ballots per minute from 11040634 to 11040717. An increase of 4.5 times the baseline in the rate of counting is a fairly substantial burst in the pace of counting ballots so early in the morning.The next item that we will examine is the insertion of votes back into the total. We document approximately 765,215 removed from the totals above; now we see in two sequential vote total reports 658,800 votes added back to the totals. And with these two ballot dumps, we see that the net result is a Biden vote increase of 354,696. I have to question the timing and the size of these reports.
Date Hr Min
To make the anomaly even clearer, if you run the percentages you find that in the first large vote dump Trump gets only a 19.5% share of the vote. Presumably the votes in this dump--totally about 10% of the total at that point--came from a fairly large number of precincts. That some precincts would be lopsided is normal, perhaps, but in this large a sample it calls for explanation.
In the second large dump Trump does better, but it's still very lopsided--he receives 25.5% of the vote. Combining the two dumps, Trump received only 22% of the reinserted votes--nothing like the way he was running when the votes were deducted.
Obviously what makes this so suspicious is the combination of
1) enormous deduction of votes in a very short span of time when Trump appears to be running well, coupled with,
2) the reinsertion of most of those votes in a very short span of time, but now heavily favoring Biden.
The deduction of large numbers of votes is, on its own, inexplicable (to me). Combined with the reinsertion ...?
To me, this seems most easily explained by software manipulation of the totals, followed up by manufacturing absentee and/or mail in ballots to cover over what happened--but with the telltale clues still appearing in the tabulation record.
Does anyone have a better explanation?