Why Vaccinate Healthy People Who Aren't At Risk?

Good question, right? We know that only a tiny fraction of the population is actually at risk from Covid, so why inject them with mRNA from the virus? It doesn't seem like common sense, and to a lot of respectable scientists it doesn't seem like ... science. For example, Michael Yeadon, an acknowledged 30 year expert in the field, late of Pfizer, says:

There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.

Yeadon is far from being a voice in the wilderness--at least not scientifically speaking. What's happening is that voices like his are being drowned out by a mass media cacophony:

Though their voices are systematically suppressed by media and big tech corporations, tens of thousands of doctors, scientists, and medical practitioners agree with Yeadon’s broad conclusions either explicitly or implicitly. The Great Barrington Declaration is the best example. These over 51,000 medical and health science professionals affirm that due to the relatively mild danger of COVID-19 to the vast majority of the population, “those who are at minimal risk” should be permitted “to live their lives normally [and] build up (herd) immunity to the virus.” Other examples include an extraordinary letter from almost 3,000 doctors and health professionals in Belgium, and hundreds of physicians in Spain and Germany calling COVID-19 a “fake pandemic” having the purpose of creating a “world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse.”

Also, most aggressively suppressed, is the fact that inexpensive, safe and very effective treatments are available for COVID-19. Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, an anti-biotic and vitamins is one such option with a phenomenal track record. Another such treatment which is hailed as nothing less than “miraculous” is the use of ivermectin, which is said to “obliterate transmission of this virus.” 

...

Proposed instead are novel, expensive, and dangerous (here, here) pharmaceutical vaccines, intended for the entire population and rolled out by the military, though COVID-19 has a 99.6 per cent survival rate, which is virtually 100 per cent for those under 20 years old, and an average age of death of about 82 years, similar to the normal lifespan.

As is evident to simple common sense, and well stated by the European doctors mentioned above, “If 95% of people experience Covid-19 virtually symptom-free, the risk of exposure to an untested vaccine is irresponsible.”

These quotes--and lots more--are from this article which explains that seemingly irrational and even anti-scientific project actually has articulable motives. Motives that place much of the human race in the cross hairs of madmen:

What is the real motivation for attempting to vaccinate millions of healthy people?

According to Dr. Carrie Madej, potential motives include genome manipulation, population control, invasive high-tech branding, continual surveillance and potential manipulation.

Of course Big Pharma firms and big investors stand to rake in fabulous amounts of money, but the article doesn't mention that as a primary motivation. Rather, there is a list of four motivating factors. I provide them below in greatly shortened form:

1.) New mRNA Vaccines may change your DNA, permanently

Please note--that's a feature, not a bug:

According to Dr. Miklos Lukacs de Pereny, a research professor of science and technology in Peru, the COVID-19 pandemic was manufactured by the world’s elites as part of a plan to globally advance “transhumanism” — literally, the fusion of human beings with technology in an attempt to alter human nature itself.

Several scholars have been raising warning flags about this imminent possibility in respect to the coronavirus vaccines aggressively being rolled-out, particularly the Bill Gates-backed Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

...

Both of these vaccines use a new “messenger RNA” technology (mRNA), which ... “could potentially alter our DNA, our genome.” ... “one little change one little protein inserted, one taken out, can actually create a congenital defect or a hereditary disorder.”

This process is called “transfection” and is the “same technology being used to make a genetically modified organism, such as a tomato or corn in the grocery store,” Madej said. Such modified organisms “are not as healthy as the organic the wild type that you see out in nature,” thus, potentially, “we would not be as healthy.”

Dr. Lukacs points out how similar DNA modifying experiments have been performed on human embryos already. Culture-of-death scientists have been “mixing genes with humans from monkeys and rats, with pigs because we want to harvest organs…” and then killing the embryos after 14 days.

 

2.) Population Control

As a major population control advocate, Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft as well as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, has been an enthusiastic supporter of these mRNA vaccines, and has spoken in the past about using vaccines as a means to reduce the world’s population. 

Interestingly, in a recent petition to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), Dr. Yeadon, and another physician made the case for suspending all COVID-19 vaccine studies in Europe, citing known risks from previous studies which still remain, including infertility in women.

 

3.) ‘Branding’ of all individuals with a digital ID using ‘Luciferase’

Another possible motive behind the COVID-19 vaccine, according to Dr. Madej, is the potential to insert a digital code, barcode or type of personal “brand” under the skin. 

Scientific American published an article late last year reporting that Bill Gates had commissioned the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to build an injectable “quantum dot dye system” to tattoo stored medical information beneath the skin of children, and potentially, adults as well.

This technology, Dr. Madej tells us, is called “Luciferase,” supposedly because this enzyme “gives a bioluminescence, a light” when activated. It is not seen or felt by the host, but with a device “like a smart phone with a special app,” one can scan over that section of the skin and it will light up passing to the device a digital code, pattern, barcode and thus an ID of some kind.

4.) Constant surveillance and technological manipulation using ‘Hydrogel’ and AI

The insertion of a different new technology under the skin, may be an additional motivation for the COVID-19 vaccine. “Hydrogel” a nanotechnology, which Madej describes as “microscopic robotic organisms,” was developed by the U.S. Defense of Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA), and a private corporation called Profusa. 

One primary function of this technology is to gather information from the host’s body, including blood pressure, blood sugar, heart rate, medications, nutrients, etc. However, Madej says, “it has the potential to be used for other things” as well, such as documenting how many steps one takes, if a person is swimming, running, sleeping, menstruating, and potentially, even one’s emotions. 

This data is constantly measured by the individual’s smart device, sent to the cloud, and to some other data base, or as she describes it, an “artificial intelligence” (AI). 

No wonder Ted Cruz tweeted just two days ago:

This is a bizarre, lunatic, totalitarian cult. 

It’s not about vaccines or  protecting people’s lives—it is instead profoundly anti-science, and is only focused on absolute govt control of every aspect of our lives.

To understand what Cruz is talking about, consider this:

To build upon the foundations of invasive control mentioned above, Gates has also invested hundreds of millions of dollars into implant chip-based devices that have the ability to deliver birth-control into the blood stream when activated from an outside remote control, a corporation which specializes in tracking pandemic infections and vaccine compliance, another which plans to blanket the globe in 5G video surveillance satellites, and he has also secured a patent for the monitoring of body and brain activity which “promises to reward compliant humans with crypto currency payments when they perform assigned activities.”

 

I'm guessing that voting for Donald Trump would be a non-compliant activity. There would be ways of dealing with that.

 

Also included in his activities is joint involvement with the U.S. Military in “Gene Drive Research” or “Gene Extinction Technology,” which allows “genetic engineers to drive a single artificial trait through an entire population by ensuring that all of an organism’s offspring carry that trait.” Using such technology to, perhaps, ensure all offspring in a group of mice are male, will guarantee that “population becomes extinct after a few generations.”

Given Bill Gates’ very public support for population control, his references in the past to the value of vaccines to depopulate the world, his support for both “Gene Extinction Technology” and the rapid mass distribution of these inadequately tested mRNA vaccines that have the potential to change one’s genome, is there a single individual, who with sufficient information, would consent to receiving such a “vaccine”?

With the reality of this relatively mild virus, which has effective treatments, might our current second wave of lockdowns be ordered toward persuading an ill-informed populace to accept such a dangerous “vaccine”?

Recognizing that this entire vaccine campaign made no sense, world-renowned microbiologist and author, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, recently stated in an interview on the Ingraham Angle, that the vaccine drive is “downright dangerous. And I warn you, if you go along these lines, you are going to go to your doom.”

The Great Reset.