Have you ever wondered what it would take to get yourself suspended by The New Yorker? Wonder no more! This isn't an exhaustive list of acts that could get you suspended, but at least we now know of one such act. Be forewarned--it could get you suspended elsewhere, too:
CNN Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin Suspended by The New Yorker For Exposing His Penis During Zoom Call
According to Toobin:
I made an embarrassingly stupid mistake, believing I was off-camera. I apologize to my wife, family, friends and co-workers.
Sure sounds like it! In fact, I'm hardpressed to come up with any reason why a guy would do that anywhere other than a washroom or a locker room. Perhaps this is SOP for Toobin whenever he believes he's "off-camera." I mean, you never know with Progs.
There's a serious point to this, however. A number of commenters have questioned why Hunter Biden would allow himself to be videoed engaging in depraved sex acts. Perhaps Toobin could explain that. Perhaps it's just the kind of thing that Progs do when they think they can get away with it. Like Bill Clinton, or any of a host of other sociopathic Progs.
Ah, so this isn't the first "embarrassingly stupid mistake" Toobin has made--even while "off camera":ReplyDelete
Nice, a paternity question arose in his past. Much like Hunter Biden's outcome with the Trump supporting Arkansas stripper. How much income does his child support payments show he makes?Delete
And the WaPo says Toobin " inadvertently exposed himself." That's some inadvertence.ReplyDelete
"Inadvertent exposure" makes about as much sense as the child who committed an "inadvertent exfiltration of a cookie from the cookie jar."Delete
He needed more than media coverage for the “inadvertent exposure”…Delete
(I’ve never heard of one that could open a zipper and peek out all by itself…)
I used the old my younger brother gave it to me line. Didn't work.Delete
How bout we give WaPo a nice big Pinocchio or did Tobin already do this?Delete
Question for legal moron Toobin: if you thought your d*ck could NOT be seen on the ZOOM conference call, what possible purpose was there for you to whip it out in the first place? Huh?ReplyDelete
The only reason for him to have done this was for SOMEBODY to see it, otherwise why do it at all? He can admire his own manhood to his heart's content in the bathroom, at home, etc. The ONLY reason for exposing himself in the setting in which he did it was for SOME ONE ELSE TO SEE IT, or at least have a likelihood of seeing it.
My theory re: Toobin & the PBS guy claiming his twitter account was hacked, etc., is that the media Lefties are losing their minds because they are realizing that Biden is going to lose.
LOL, Zooms hell on those who play with their BB guns online !!ReplyDelete
Any truth to the rumor (wink-wink, nod-nod) that a woman on the Zoom call, upon spying Toobin's manhood, exclaimed: "Ohhh, look; it's just like pen*s, only SMALLER!"Delete
Pass it on ...
when most people are on zoom conferences, you cannot tell if they have pants on or not...may have been preening for the camera?ReplyDelete
Heard on radio incident involved more than mere exposure...
Will we get a “judge for yourself” replay on nationwide media? Fact-checking? Did he or didn’t he? What did he do and when did he do it? And why?Delete
@Bebe. Perhaps it was prep for a CNN round table feature.Delete
It's the kind of thing a narcissist does to prove their "smarter" than their "inferiors".ReplyDelete
However, I used to have a CPO that would take me aside, usually after a briefing by some whiz-bang staff type, and tell me , "S______s, don't be a d__k." At last I understand what he meant. ;-)
But, this is what I was talking about re: S. Cornyn in an earlier thread.
"...as far as I can throw him". If he were any more Swamp he would have gills and web feet. Only the 20% of him that is warm blooded mammal (genus Mustela) makes him tolerable over a Democrat.
@ Tom S.Delete
And let's never forget.
Any word from Wray yet on how many agents have been assigned to figure out how the Russians hacked his Zoom account?ReplyDelete
First we have to determine exactly what was hacked; the program or his penis.Delete
Gives a new meaning to Zoom.
FLASH FAKE NEWS:ReplyDelete
Toobin declares images of his d*ck seen on a recent Zoom call were planted by Russian intelligence as part of a smear campaign to discredit him because he's a critic of Trump.
I don’t believe a word he says. I’ve known of Toobin, unfortunately, ever since the O. J. trial, where he was one of the rent-an-analysts. And not a first rate one. He has tried to sell us some bogus stories over the years, but this one takes the cake. I’ve done Zoom. You see yourself in a little box on screen when your camera is on and you see only a little black box with your name or initials when you turn your camera off. Muting your voice is a separate operation. So, Jeffrey, your story doesn’t sell… you knew darned well you were flashing or worse… It was right there on your screen. Zoom meetings can be terminally boring, but you’d be better off taking up knitting...ReplyDelete
OK, so you don't think it was inadvertent?Delete
No, I just think he was bored. Or advertising?Delete
I think there are Zoom configs where you don't see your own video - we have participated in calls where you just see four cameras per page and slide from page to page to see all the others.Delete
I'm sure exposing himself on camera was inadvertent, but it's still inexcusable. The real question was why he was naked below deck; was it for a prior call? Whatever it is, it's just creepy and, frankly, disrespectful.
These guys are just amazing, the headlines write themselves.ReplyDelete
See above--GREAT MINDS!ReplyDelete
The Russians did it--or MADE me do it!
I can not believe it was a Russian hacking. Even Russian hackers would have a bigger imagination than that.ReplyDelete
From a thread at another site:ReplyDelete
“Isn't it fascinating to think that probably the only laugh that man will ever get in life is by stripping off and showing his shortcomings?” - David Niven
Biden is paying Jeffey to grab the headlines so that he’ll have one news cycle to get his next batch of lies together?ReplyDelete
Toobin’s a real sweetheart. The soul of honesty and ethics.ReplyDelete
This is not the first time work-related activity has gotten Toobin in trouble. In 2008, Toobin had an extramarital affair with a co-worker’s daughter that resulted in a pregnancy. Toobin reportedly offered the woman money to abort the child, in addition to offering to pay for the woman to have another child via a sperm donor. When the woman said she would not be having an abortion, Toobin reportedly told her she was going to regret it and that she should not expect any support from him.
After the child was born, Toobin was forced to go to court with the woman to address custody and financial disputes. Toobin reportedly resisted having his name on the child’s birth certificate and failed to pay the requested child support.
Another inadvertency? Dunno. And not a Russian in sight...
Let's name this episode #ToobinToastGate.Delete
"I'm hardpressed to come up with any reason why a guy would do that anywhere other than a washroom or a locker room."ReplyDelete
Oh come on, who among us hasn't found himself inadvertently flashing his junk in a meeting, the checkout line, or a court room? These things just happen. And to be fair, is it not possible that Toobin got confused? After all, at CNN, showing ones ass is completely normal. They all do it.
Toobin or not ToobinReplyDelete
Toobin blames "Russian Disinfobation Hoax" for Zoom call scandal.ReplyDelete
Always knew he was a whack job ;<)ReplyDelete
Was he trying to get ahead of something?ReplyDelete
@CNN Jeffrey Toobin just put it this way: “If Kavanaugh was your prospective babysitter and 3 people told you he could be a sexual predator, would you hire him to watch your kids?”ReplyDelete
We keep saying that these people accuse their enemies of that which they themselves are guilty. And they keep proving it.Delete
"I believed to be off camera"... Sounds like his Zoom was "hacked" a.k.a. Scully style.ReplyDelete
Clearly, Toobin is a "hands-on" guy when it comes to getting a "firm grip" on the "thrust" of a legal argument.ReplyDelete
I think he went nuts.Delete
See my comment, para 3, @ 3:19 PM today on this thread.Delete
Somewhat on topicReplyDelete
"...or is it just the IC engaging in onanism over all the cool stuff they know?"
Learned a new word today - onanism. How timely, and used correctly in my opinion.