UPDATED: Covid Regime Update

Not much in the way of commentary seems necessary. Covid is the perfect way to introduce totalitarian control of the population. They start with disfavored demographics, then expand:

Irish government announces it will continue restrictions on Catholic sacraments

'It is advised that religious ceremonies such as Baptisms, First Holy Communions and Confirmations should not take place at this time. Further advice will follow on resumption of these ceremonies when it is safe to do so,' new advice published on the Irish government website on June 29 reads.

Don't call us, we'll call you?

Who's getting paid to do this?

White House Announces They Will Go Door to Door to Enhance National Vaccination Compliance

July 6, 2021 | Sundance

Comrade citizens, the COVID Ministry announced today they will assist your compliance for vaccinated status by visiting you in your home.  Prepare for the Jackboots to arrive on your doorstep to inquire about your vaccinated status.

The spokesperson for the regime made the compliance announcement earlier today during a press conference: “targeted community, by community, door-to-door outreach“.

These things never go away, so presumably when this is done some other task will be found that will involve "targeted community, by community, door-to-door outreach“.

You're not hearing about this, either, are you?

Inventor of mRNA vaccines ‘concerned’ by reports of excessive uterine bleeding as vaccine side effect

'I am hearing again and again about dysmennorhea and "heavy flow" as a vaccine side effect. The thing is, "heavy flow" can actually be occult spontaneous abortion. This adverse event seems to be totally overlooked by CDC and FDA. I am concerned. This relates to reproduction,' Dr. Robert Malone tweeted on July 4.

But wait--there's actually more, from a New England Journal of Medicine study just two weeks ago. I'll bet you didn't hear about this, either. And notice what's going on. What is it about the Covid regime that makes researchers want to obscure their findings? Weird, isn't it?

UPDATE: The following notice has now appeared at LifeSite

Update July 1, 2021: This article has been temporarily pulled for further review, so LifeSite can make adjustments and provide additional clarification regarding the data. We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you for your understanding and patience as we seek to maintain accurate and honest reporting.

However, the link to the NEJM article works. I've reread the Abstract portion and it seems plenty disturbing. I'll be checking back at LifeSite to see what's up.

‘Huge red flag’: Medical researchers bury data showing 82% miscarriage rate in vaccinated women

'The evidence is actually there in the NEJM study, but completely misrepresented in the way the data was presented in general,' an oncology researcher shared with LifeSiteNews.

WALTHAM, Massachusetts, June 30, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A medical journal discovered that 82% of women who took an mRNA vaccine in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy had a miscarriage — and then it then buried the data. 

In mid-June the New England Journal of Medicine published a study called “Preliminary FIndings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons” by Tom T. Shimabukuro and others from the Center of Disease Control’s “v-safe COVID-10 Pregnancy Registry Team.” The team wrote that there were “no obvious safety signals among pregnant [women] who received Covid-19 vaccines” even though it published a table which showed that 82% of women in the study who were injected with either the Pfizer or the Moderna vaccine during early pregnancy lost their babies. More prominent in their study was a claim that only 13.9% of all “completed pregnancies” had ended in miscarriage — but this figure included the women who were not vaccinated until they were in the second half of their pregnancies.

The significance of the buried information was not lost on a British oncology researcher who shared her information with LifeSiteNews. Having at first found the conclusions of the study’s abstract “reassuring,” the researcher went on to discover “Table 4” and the fine print under it. 

“The researchers inexplicably subsumed the first trimester spontaneous abortions — before, and including, 20 weeks — into the completed pregnancy/losses as a whole—104 [miscarriages] out of 827 pregnancies,” she wrote to two leading British doctors, Dr. Peter Rabey, the medical director of the U.K.’s Channel Island of Guernsey, and Dr. Nicola Brink, Guernsey’s director of Public Health.

“However, since the aim was to discover whether Covid vaccination had any adverse effects in the different trimesters, the NEJM papers’ authors should have deducted the 700 women who were not actually vaccinated until the third trimester from the total 827, leaving only those vaccinated in the first 20 weeks, i.e. 127 women to figure in that part of Table 4.”

The researcher pointed out that the “real rate” of spontaneous miscarriages among women vaccinated in the first 20 weeks of their pregnancy was not 12.6% but 82% because 104 of these 127 pregnancies were lost. She highlighted the “small print” in the study that stated that a “total of 700 participants (84.6) received their first eligible dose in the third trimester” and that a “total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions (92.3%) occurred before 13 weeks of gestation.”

...

Variants, Scariants.

Just some snippets from a longer and informative article:

The Great Big 'Delta' Scariant

Why the Delta scare?

As a virus mutates, it becomes more contagious and less lethal. And then eventually it mostly disappears. Many voices claim that Delta will be with us for a very long time, but we should be so lucky. It’s way more likely that it will soon be followed by a next variant that will in turn become dominant. And more contagious and less lethal.

And no, that’s not because of unvaccinated people, or at least there’s no logic in that. If most people are not vaccinated, the virus has no reason to mutate. If many people are, it does. So this CNN piece is suspect. Vaccinated people are potential variant factories, just as much, if and when the vaccines used don’t stop them from being infectious, as the present vaccines don’t, far as we know.

...

First, the vaccines don’t confer immunity on the jabbed, there is no evidence of that. Second, a large majority of healthy people have an immune system strong enough to fight off the infection, even without ever being infected. So to suggest that unvaccinated people might “gain some protection from the immunity of” the vaccinated is simply nonsense.

As for “Delta’s ascendancy”, yes, cases are rising in the UK and Israel, two highly vaccinated countries. Not that anyone would acknowledge a possible connection there: it’s all despite the vaccines, not because of them. But as the graph below shows, while cases there are up a lot, hospitalization and deaths are not over the past month. They barely register.

...

In another graph, the Delta variant Case Fatality Rate in the UK even appears 8 times higher among the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Maybe the press should pay a little more attention to that, instead of the Great Big Delta Scare. All they do today is sell fear and vaccines, but that will backfire, promise.

Apparently the Delta Scariant has fallen pretty flat, because now they're ginning up a Lambda Scariant:

Lambda Variant's "Unusual" Mutations May Make It Resistant To Vaccines, Researchers Fear(monger)

Did you catch that? Unusual mutations? That's what immunologically knowledgeable guys like Michael Yeadon and Sucharit Bhakdi have been talking about. Mass vaccinations during a pandemic can lead to directed mutations, rather than random mutations.

However ...

WHO virologist Jairo Mendez-Rico told DW that although the strain may exhibit higher infection rates, there is no indication that it is more aggressive.