The Left does not wish to admit it has become the party of wealth.
...So why are we not talking about class?First, we are watching historic changes in political alignment.The two parties are switching class constituents. Sixty-five percent of Americans making over $500,000 are now Democrats. Seventy-four percent of those who earn under $100,000 are Republicans. Gone are the days of working people voting automatically Democratic or Republicans caricatured as a party of stockbrokers on golf courses.By 2018, Democrats controlled all 20 of the wealthiest congressional districts. In the recent presidential primaries and general election, 17 out of the 20 wealthiest zip codes gave money overwhelmingly to Democratic candidates.Increasingly, the Democrats are a bicoastal party of professional elites of corporate America, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, the media, universities, entertainment, and professional sports. All made out like bandits during 21st-century globalization.
"Like bandits." A very traditional style of banditry. Take from the poor and give to the rich. And the retainers to the wealthy.
Democrats have lost the most support among working-class whites, especially in the interior of the country. But they are also fast forfeiting backing among the Hispanic middle class, and just beginning to lose solidarity among similarly situated African-Americans.The Left does not wish to admit it has become the party of wealth. All too often its stale revolutionary speechifying sounds more like penance arising from guilt than genuine advocacy for the middle class of all races.The wealthy leftist elite has mastered the rhetoric of ridicule for the lower middle classes, especially struggling whites. Multimillionaires Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden wrote off their political opponents as supposedly crude, superstitious, and racist, in smearing them as “clingers,” “deplorables,” irredeemables,” “dregs,” and “chumps.”Class is also fluid; race is immutable. So by fixating on race, the Left believes that it can divide America into permanent victimizers and victims—at a time when race and class are increasingly disconnecting.The wealthy of all races are the loudest voices of the woke movement. ......
On November 3, Democrats conducted a fraudulent election in several key swing states. The result was that Biden, a man of exceptional stupidity and corruption now occupies the Oval Office. His Veep, Kamala Harris, is a woman fully as stupid as he is who is anxiously awaiting him to vacate that office. What stands in her way is probably Mrs. Joe Biden, a woman with the soul of Lady Macbeth and the practices of Edith Wilson.America is an incredibly resilient country and it had better be to survive this banana republic madness.
Tucker Carlson opened his show Wednesday night by announcing that he’d gotten information from a whistleblower about Biden’s latest activity to bring illegal aliens into America. It turns out that the military has been involved in secretly transporting illegal aliens (or as the military coyly calls them, “undocumented non-citizens”) to resettle them in America’s heartland. The administration is acting illegally and there’s a good argument every person involved – the President, Vice President, congressional Democrats, and the military officers signing off on this scheme – must be impeached.As Tucker explains, in the last six months, despite explicit laws detailing orderly immigration (laws that reflect the will of the people through their legislature), the Biden administration has opened America’s southern border. Under Biden’s aegis, one million Latin Americans (plus people from African and the Middle East) have flooded into America...and then they’ve vanished. We know that the administration has been shipping them to Red states. What we learned from Tucker is that the United States military, which is sworn to protect America against invasions, is complicit in this conduct.
The descent into leftism of our current military brass has been a much-discussed topic lately. As RedState reported previously, the woke ad campaigns belittle the mission and make a mockery of the readiness of our military. ...
But just in case you thought our military leadership was delusional enough, a new book reveals just how insane they were and continue to be.
The nation’s top military leaders discussed a plan to resign one by one rather than carry out dangerous orders in the event of an attempted coup by then-President Donald Trump and his allies after the November election, new book reveals https://t.co/epzvLdia08
— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) July 15, 2021
Apparently, Gen. Milley, most recently made famous for backing critical race theory in the military, and other generals hatched a plan to resign in sequence had Donald Trump tried to stage a coup. Yes, these absolute imbeciles seriously believed the former president was going to order them to institute a military takeover of the country. All this was happening while they were ignoring orders to help bring peace during the riots summer of 2020.
To pick the worst press failure of the past half-decade would be a daunting assignment, but the coverage of the Steele dossier would have to be high on any list. ...The Steele dossier is just one recent instance of the media presenting the public with information that originated in a vast and opaque industry of private spies and operatives for hire who do business without all the rules and ethics of traditional media outlets, but who often inject their version of events into the mainstream press by feeding tips and scoops to reporters.
The left’s response was a scorched earth policy to destroy Trump. Five years into their implacable opposition, we now see the earth the left scorched was America.
America has been torched by the left’s scorched-earth strategy to defeat Donald Trump. While Trump was still in office, the price was already high. With Trump gone, we are learning that high price was just a down payment.Today, America is paying in full in its cities, in its schools, on its southern border, and abroad. Seemingly behind every shameful headline is a leftist lowlight.
We shortchange the ambitions of the left and minimize the perils of our time when we focus on race. Race is just a weapon the left is using in its ongoing cultural revolution, which aims to dismantle the pillars of Western culture.Academic activists and corporate apparatchiks who advance cancel culture and critical race theory in the name of racial reckoning are either sympathetic collaborators or useful idiots being manipulated by the left for their far broader and destructive project.The left, which is dominated by the white intelligentsia, has seized on race because it is so fraught with the emotion of history and identity. It’s a narrative that enables revolutionaries to exploit the founding principles of equality and fairness that define America and Americans. It allows race and gender theorists to prey on the guilt many feel about shameful aspects of our past to camouflage their ideological program as a moral crusade....At bottom, the left has embraced a wrecking ball ideology that seeks to raze all in its path. The main impulse is not to build a better world but to destroy all that exists. It might not be long before these postmodern Robespierres follow their archetypes in the French Revolution and propose a new calendar, erasing the past and restarting human history at Year One...The gist of their analysis is that the collapse of the Soviet Union and communism was a disaster for Marxists in the academy. In response to the debunking of their own historical narrative, they set about tearing down every other one. Their project was largely destructive: They sought to “deconstruct” and “problematize” long-held ideals to render them untenable. Nothing is beyond their denunciations and cancellations. Social justice, race and identity politics have given them a powerful weapon in their quest to destroy the status quo and rehabilitate their failed Marxist doctrines in new guises: primarily race and gender.I understand why conservatives are focusing on the rise of critical race theory and its sister concepts such as systemic racism, implicit bias, privilege and “white fragility.” It provides a meaningful shorthand for a hydra-headed movement that is hard to define because of it scale and unquenchable ambition. But the emphasis on race is counterproductive. It allows the left to define the terms of the debate in a manner that gives its efforts a moral legitimacy they do not deserve.What’s going on is about much more than race. It is long past time we recognized that we are in the midst not of a culture war, but a cultural revolution, and muster the resistance it demands.
A this-world agenda displaced Christianity’s distinctive mission: cultivation of a higher understanding of the purposes of life.
The pressure for universal injection with a biological agent still under probation is unprecedented. Equally remarkable is the papal embrace of vaccine politics and its network of commercial partners and global governments. Propelled by COVID, the military-industrial complex of 60 years ago has its parallel in the medical-industrial complex. And the Vatican approves.
In January, Pope Francis suggested we are morally obligated to take an experimental coronavirus vaccine. Not to take it was “suicidal denialism” and an offense against love of neighbor. A needle in every arm is the only decent thing.
Addressing the World Bank and International Monetary Fund on April 4, he advocated “global governance” to enforce “a justly financed vaccine solidarity.” It was a good day for stakeholders in the global market for the newly patented vaccines.
The Fifth International Vatican Conference on cell therapies followed weeks later. Conducted over Zoom this year, it was co-hosted by the Pontifical Council for Culture under Cardinal Ravasi, and Robin L. Smith’s Cura Foundation and its subsidiary, Stem For Life.
The Vatican is not to blame for putting its assets to work. But by shilling for a volatile, cash-strapped industry the Vatican conspires with a cartel of necessarily self-interested entities: competitive drug companies, lobbyists, academics, grant-seeking scientists, and research institutions, plus government bureaucracies. It aligns with a research leviathan beholden to the benefit of its paymasters.
This same aggregate of interests is rife with the jockeying for position, careerist ambitions, self-dealing, and eye for market opportunities as any other industry. It can serve a broad range of purposes, many of them unsympathetic to a Judeo-Christian vision of man.
In his 1961 farewell address to the nation, President Eisenhower warned against the power of money on research, particularly federal money. He foresaw the “danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific/technological elite.” Willing captive to that elite, the Vatican forgets that Jesus of Nazareth did not heal the sick to abolish disease.
Of course Milley and others didn't seriously think that Trump would "stage a coup", but they likely had reason to hope that they could gin-up "evidence" to back such a spin.ReplyDelete
We're being ruled by a bunch of people with the ethics of Hunter Biden and the rationality of Charles Manson.ReplyDelete
Trumps retort on Milley is classic…ReplyDelete
Just another example of how special "45" is/was. What other President (or politician) was ever this brutally and refreshingly honest? “Spend more time thinking about China and Russia, and less time on being politically correct.” As per usual Trump, that is not a political statement, it is a pragmatic one:Delete
If only he was still in office. I suspect (and certainly hope) he would not now be as deferential and "nice" to the denizens of the deep state as he was.
86/46 He ain’tReplyDelete
Our punter of a pontiff needs to be reminded that the mission of The Church is not to save lives: it is to save souls. He had better start with his own. He is keeping some demonic company.ReplyDelete
Trumps retort on Milley is classic…ReplyDelete
I found this video amusing:
The Very Model Of A Woke Postmodern General
And if you just want to read the lyrics:
CJCS Mark Milley— "The Very Model of A Woke Postmodern General" John Derbyshire at Unz Review
From Trump’s retort on Milley (which is indeed a classic):Delete
to anyone, a coup of our Government. So ridiculous! Sorry to inform you, but an Election is my form of "coup," and if I was going to do a coup, one of the last people I would want to do it with is General Mark Milley. He got his job only because the world’s most overrated general, James Mattis, could not stand him, had no respect for him, and would not recommend him. To me the fact that Mattis didn’t like him, just like Obama didn’t like him and actually fired Milley, was a good thing, not a bad thing. I often act counter to people's advice who I don’t respect.
There was a bored officer in Vietnam (quoted in the book "Sideshow") who also did a riff on Gilbert and Sullivan. I can't remember all the words, but it went something like:ReplyDelete
I am the very model of an officer of protocol
I know all the social graces, I drink anything that's potable
I smile at my superiors with unctuous insincerity
I sneer at those below me as though my presence were a charity
In matters that are sociable, promotable and potable
I am the very model of an officer of protocol
"To use a phrase from my youth, it's mind blowing that our Power Elite--including the likes of Bluto Barr, leading legislators, and even the SCOTUS--believed that this is what Americans deserve."ReplyDelete
It seems increasingly clear that the 2020 riots were principally aimed as a foretaste of what cities and states could expect if Trump was allowed to win reelection. This is particularly true with the report that plans were made to launch riots in at least 400 locations across the country (any city above 50k population) if Trump won. This menacing threat was used to persuade people like Justice Roberts and countless other judges, mayors, officials, et al that allowing the election coup to prevail was preferable to widespread destruction and violence.
Milley never fired Vindman. His other sins are pretty much laid out here:ReplyDelete
Some are calling him Dr. Strangelove. I call him traitor. He told his Dad he didn’t want to be in the military, so went to Princeton and let his hair grow long, partied hearty, and ended up in the ROTC. He’s a chunky little popinjay, trying - as did Mattis - to convince us that he is an intellectual, a deep thinker. I see an ambitious crazy.