Pages

Friday, November 15, 2019

UPDATED: The Roger Stone Verdict

It seems almost pointless to multiply words over this when Mike Cernovich seems to understand the big picture here, and can place it in perspective:


UPDATE: Another excellent example--rule of law? Not so much:







5 comments:

  1. A swamp jury, swamp judge. No big surprise. Would like an explanation of why Stone's lawyers didn't even try for a change of venue.
    Tom S.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And, a guess on, if Barr dare push for changes of venue (all the way to the Supremes) for whatever trials emerge (from Durham's probing).
    Since SCOTUS OKed changes of venue for reasons of jury-pool racial balance, why can't they OK such changes for reasons of patent (Swamp) jury-pool political bias?

    ReplyDelete
  3. In their eyes, is he another potential Trump flipper? (He has vowed that he never would do so.) Or is it just their way of punishing someone they believe was close to PDJT. Or guilt by association? They are evil and desperate, a bad combnation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fact is that Stone wasn't really close to the campaign as it deveoped but rather a past associate who remained in touch.

      Delete
    2. No, but he is Deplorable and they are the true enemy. A message must be sent, "Don't stand on you're hind legs; grovel in the dust like the beast of the field you are."
      Tom S.

      Delete