Two interesting posts at Zerohedge touch on the "complete loss of trust" that is manifesting itself in seemingly unrelated areas of life. Seemingly unrelated, but in reality they touch on the breakdown of trust that the public has in our ruling institutions and elite.
The title of the first post is self explanatory, so I'll just add the initial sentences that will establish the connection:
"Complete Loss Of Trust": Half Of French Home Health Workers Say They'll Resist Taking VaccineAstounding new figures out of France suggest what is no doubt a broader global trend of hesitancy and skepticism when it comes to the current big push to 'vaccinate all'.Reuters in covering the country's vaccine rollout finds that merely around "half of health workers in French care homes do not want to be vaccinated" — even after many of these routinely witness the ravages of COVID-19 on the elderly and infirm."There’s a complete loss of trust," one home health care worker and trade union representative was cited in the report as saying, reflecting resistance to the growing pressure ...
Acrimony and recriminations continue to swirl around the 2020 presidential election. Three out of four Republicans believe that there was “widespread fraud” in the election, while Democrats have sought to turn criticisms of the election into a “Big Lie” heresy against democracy. Senior congressional Democrats are pressuring the nation’s largest cable providers to cease carrying conservative networks such as Fox News that raised too many questions about Biden’s victory.What could possibly go wrong with sweeping the 2020 election controversies under the rug? Clues can be found in a recent report, “Elections: Lessons from the U.S. Experience in Afghanistan,” produced by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). ...
SIGAR notes the difficulty of building a viable democracy when elected officials formally receive a license to steal. ...Afghanistan also illustrates the perils of computer voting. ...
Perhaps the real Afghan lesson is that there is no “guardian angel of democracy.” Politicians permitting citizens to vote does not assure that election results will receive even a whiff of legitimacy. Once fraud or suspicions of fraud reach a certain level, any election winners will be suspected scoundrels. More than 15 years of corrupt elections in Afghanistan have resulted in a central government with little or no popular support or credibility. A U.S. Army colonel who deployed several times to Afghanistan told SIGAR that as early as 2006, the Afghan government had “self-organized into a kleptocracy.” Officials who were stealing everything else never hesitated to steal votes. The only reason the Afghan government has not yet been toppled by the Taliban is because of the presence of the U.S. military.
And is there a lesson from the endless lies that U.S. government officials have told about Afghan democracy? At a confidential 2015 National Security Council meeting, President Obama admitted that the U.S. would never “transform Afghanistan into a semblance of a democracy able to defend itself,” the New York Times reported. But that didn’t deter Obama from publicly bragging the following year that U.S. troops and diplomats had helped Afghanistan “establish a democratic government.” Are U.S. government officials more honest when they talk about American democracy than when they praise sham democracies abroad?
..., U.S. election processes remain far more credible than Afghanistan’s. But last year’s election was the fourth U.S. presidential election since 2000 that was widely perceived as heavily tainted. When the Supreme Court voted last week not to hear cases challenging arbitrary changes in state election procedures, Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, “The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence.”
I wonder if we can get your blog re: Afghanistan on the S.C. docket next month for them to read.ReplyDelete
YouTube just took down trumps cpac speech - unbelievable.ReplyDelete
It must be nice to be YouTube/Google/Alphabet (2020 Revenue:ReplyDelete
$ 182.53 billion; 2020 Operating income:$ 41.22 billion) and not care about viewer clicks or...profit. Probably time for the Antitrust Division to take a closer look.
In any event, it won't matter in a few years. Any more than it will matter whether CNN reports the Hunter Biden story. It will get out.
Re: Google / Alphabet revs...ReplyDelete
I think that is a very good show of something conservatives miss in the boycotting movement. People decry these companies and go into boycotting mode without thinking or understanding that they are less than .003 of companies market share. The companies themselves are cheering "good bye and good riddance"!
Boycotting only has an impact when you have an actual market stake, in tech, major league sports and dozens of other woke markets conservatives are calculated as irrelevant. What's 80 million trump supporters vs 1.3B Facebook users over all?
We're not as big as we think we are and the ole ego doesn't math so well in many of these cases. Sometimes it makes more sense to fight (collectively) vs walking away.