Pages

Saturday, May 16, 2020

How We Know The Flynn FD-302 Is SUPER Important

Undercover Huber's has been collating what we know about negotiations between Flynn's original legal team from Covington and Team Mueller. It's not stuff we didn't know already, but it's nicely arranged to make the main point: Team Mueller knew that if they wanted a chance to squeeze Flynn to force him to lie about Trump it was essential that neither Flynn nor his lawyers should EVER see the FD-302(s) summarizing the FBI interview of Flynn. That "(s)", of course, is very important, because any halfway competent attorney would quickly recognize at a glance that the FD-302 dated February 19, 2017, couldn't possibly be original, and would also demand to see the interview notes.

That's the reason Team Mueller had to threaten both Flynn (prosecution of his son if he doesn't plead) and his lawyers (fact witnesses of the FARA filing for Flynn). They needed Flynn to plead and for his lawyers to forego all discovery, and they needed that ASAP. The original Team Mueller lie--that the FD-302 contained their whole Russia Hoax strategy--wasn't working, so they had to turn to outright threats that were legally dubious to begin with.

The SCO claimed they couldn’t turn over the FD-302 because it would “reveal” parts of their overall Russia interference investigation. But even the edited version of the Jan 24, 2017 interview shows Flynn wasn’t asked about Russian interference or anything remotely like Collusion.
And we now know that the FBI itself wanted to close its Crossfire Razor investigation of Flynn for potential links to Russian interference long before that Jan 24, 2017 interview. 
And that investigation of Flynn should never have been opened in the first place, given its laughably weak predicate lacking any articulable factual basis for believing he could have been colluding or conspiring with Russia. 
We also now know that the Dec 29 Flynn-Kislyak call changed nothing with regards to any Collusion. And the FBI never opened a Logan Act criminal probe (which would also have been ridiculous). 
And in the Mueller report, the SCO itself admits Flynn merely asked Russia not to “escalate” in response to Obama’s sanctions or only respond “reciprocally”. There’s nothing wrong with that. What should he have said, go ahead nuclear armed Russia, please escalate?

Red State has a nice readable formatting of Undercover Huber's entire twitter thread, with some extra explanation: Undercover Huber Chronicles the Extraordinary Actions Taken by Team Mueller to Avoid Turning Over Flynn’s Original 302.

Who thinks Sullivan and his behind the scenes handlers like Gleeson don't understand all of this? What does this tell you about the degree to which Dems have corrupted the Judicial Branch?

9 comments:

  1. How many more "explosive" revelations can the conspiracy members withstand? How much longer can a liberal media keep its head buried in the sand? Trump must continue to be the loudest voice to keep "Obamagate" in the headlines. Any "gate" reference seems passé in this case. Crime of the century is a much better description of what has occurred.

    DJL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Start referring to Obama as Richard Milhous Obama.

      Rob S

      Delete
    2. The liberal media's heads are not in the sand and never were. They are witting accomplices.

      Delete
  2. As long as it takes to cover the story...with a pillow..til it's dead.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This RedState article is outstanding. All this is why I personally believe Christopher Wray will be fired soon. He’s either been hiding the original document (and Agent Pientka who wrote it, by the way) OR he’s hiding the fact the FBI has somehow scrubbed it from their system. Even if he now magically produces it, he’ll have to explain why he’s been sitting on it. None of it is good for our corrupt FBI Director. I think Wray has it though. I also think Durham must have it at this point as well. But perhaps Durham doesn't want to release it because it could inhibit his investigation? If so, this is a helluva thing. Nevertheless, went it comes out, I'm sure we'll also get to learn how corrupt Dana Boente has been the entire time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ever since I heard the name Pientka (years ago, now) I thought who is guy and what does he know?

      Delete
  4. With electronic communications, it’s almost impossible to Destroy every copy. And it makes the claim the fbi can’t find it, even more suspicious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Total joke. shipwreckedcrew says what I've always assumed--that Durham has thoroughly interviewed and debriefed Pientka.

      Delete
  5. My view is that the Corrupt Cabal stepped up its game only after Sidney Powell asked for Holder's emails concerning Flynn as part of her discovery request.

    Wonder if there are some incriminating exchanges between Wingmen?

    ReplyDelete