Pages

Monday, June 7, 2021

Briefly Noted: Tripling The Breakthrough

Very briefly--lots more at the link:


COVID hospitalizations, deaths for the vaccinated more than triple in one month, CDC reports

A total of 10,262 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine 'breakthrough infections' – defined as coronavirus infections in fully vaccinated people – were reported to the CDC from 46 U.S. states and territories between January 1 and April 30, 2021.


June 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Deaths and hospitalizations for COVID-19 infection have tripled among the fully vaccinated in the U.S. in the past month. 

Deaths from COVID in those who have been fully vaccinated against the disease increased from 160 as of April 30 to 535 as of June 1, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

...

CDC no longer counting post-vaccine cases

“Despite the high level of vaccine efficacy, a small percentage of fully vaccinated persons (i.e. received all recommended doses of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine) will develop symptomatic or asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19,” the CDC said in May.

The health oversight agency added that it would only be counting COVID-19 cases and infections after vaccination that resulted in patients being hospitalized or dying from May 1 onward – discounting almost 90% of cases of vaccine failure. 

The policy leaves a gaping hole in data collection on vaccine effectiveness. What’s more, since only 27% of the reported cases were asymptomatic, it also leaves a bulk of vaccinated people who are symptomatic – more than 60% of reported cases are actually ill with COVID symptoms – who are perhaps unwittingly spreading the disease because they do not suspect themselves of having a COVID infection because they have received their shots. But the CDC is no longer counting them.

The CDC did not respond to questions about how discounting the majority COVID breakthrough infections might affect analysis of data efficacy.

Given that the CDC definition of “breakthrough infection” is in “fully vaccinated” individuals, the agency is also discounting cases of COVID infection among those who have only received one dose of vaccine in its statistics.

...


Of course the big question is, are these cases true "breakthrough" cases or are they cases involving antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)?


14 comments:

  1. I have a question, why is our government giving any money to charities, is this not tax dollars?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's just poor journalism. Non-profits are not the same as charities.

      Delete
  2. I suppose we're going to forget all about math and figurin' and stuff like we did for election 2020 results, how hard really are the statistics here regarding severity of the infection per age range between prevacinnated infection and breakthrough infection? How hard to research age and health of victims? My antenna go up when they drop the term "cases" and start using hospitalizations and deaths when citing numbers, to make them SEEM smaller. Sad, chilling, despicable, patronizing, evil, inhuman, I could go on, but couldn't we all? Mark A (Ashlii Babbitt didn't die/wasn't bleeding from the neck/why are they not even bothering with the details in their lies?)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is anyone else struggling with a schizophrenia over this whole vaccine/experimental drug thing? I am 100% against this reckless injection of an experimental drug, esp with younger populations who have almost zero risk of harm from Wuflu. But then i get whipsawed by all Trump and the patriot media that want to tout this miraculous Operation Warp Speed drug. I generally support the President so it's stretching me to reconcile what seems like a very dangerous and possibly disastrous drug with a president i support who backs these drugs. Yes, i get that Trump was forced into getting this drug out there in order to short circuit the Oligarchy's plan to keep us in perpetual lockdown, but does he have to brag about it like it's a great thing, rather than a mental crutch for the paranoid and gullible?

    Treble

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm w you Treble.

    Not only does he have to puff about the Warp Speed Vaccine, but during his presidency he had to wax bellicose to keep the Cheney wing (what's left of it) in line. And he had to sign trillion dollar deficit budgets. And hire innumerable disloyal swamp rats. And much more.

    I was hoping that he would have much more scope to implement his policies in a second term following a landslide victory. I'm kinda still hoping.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I tend to forgive a lot of the puffing because for the most part, based purely on comparison to other politicians, Trump does what he promises to do. With warp speed, there is probably a lot he did to clear the way for a speedy rollout of the vaccine and quite probably he was goaded into it by the fraud deployed against him but honestly the medical community has A LOT more to answer for as far as I am concerned starting with all our mini Faucis at the state health departments trotting out their projections week after week to justify taking away our freedoms. If the vaccines are bio-weapons, or just risky medicine, well PDJT worked to make it available he didn't warp science and common sense to force everyone to take it. It's way to easy to blame Trump when there are so very many others who knew better than to respond to a low lethality coronavirus the way we did. For starters oh, I don't know Dr. Deborah Birks...why does she get to skulk off the stage. Unlike Fauci isn't she a virologist? Mark A

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ah well...i suppose that's the best we can hope for: the injection turns out to be relatively benign afterall, the virus and lockdowns are memory holed, and we move on to the next crisis, real or manufactured.

    Treble

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't see how you draw that as a conclusion.

      Delete
    2. @mark

      What do you mean how? Isn't that a best case scenario here, that the injections are not, afterall, an evil plan of some kind and do not turn out to be as disastrous as we all fear they will be? Or is your question that it's already too late for this scenario given the deaths and disabilities we've already seen?

      Treb

      Delete
    3. Not to mention the harm to our civil liberties.

      Delete
  7. OT

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/06/07/doj-says-it-seized-2-3-million-in-bitcoin-from-colonial-pipeline-hackers/comment-page-1/#comments

    Sundance has a report on the pipeline hack ransom retrieval of the Bitcoin payment, parked on a North Carolina server?

    So many angels of this story do not add up at all, this deserves all the attention it should get.

    Could this be the ultimate PR stunt to plug the 1.8T infrastructure proposal, to get the public and senators on board? So many angels to this story.

    Russian sophisticated hackers, supposedly approved by Putin leave money sitting at a US Server? Come on man!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Russian sophisticated hackers, supposedly approved by Putin leave money sitting at a US Server? Come on man!"

      It does seem negligent.

      Delete
    2. Don't worry, everything Gina and John do is for the good of the country, the good of the world really. They are wonderful people and I trust them completely. Mark A.

      Delete