Readers should be familiar with the name Michael Yeadon by now. Wikipedia has no page for Yeadon, but one Wiki page refers to Yeadon as "a former Pfizer employee and conspiracy theorist." The fact that there is no actual Wikipedia page for Yeadon but that Wikipedia publishes unsourced claims that Yeadon is a "conspiracy theorist" is highly suggestive. Yeadon, in the eyes of the political establishment, is a 'dangerous person.' Someone who must be marginalized--not debated.
In actual fact, Dr. Michael Yeadon was formerly Pfizer's Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory. He spent 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry leading new medicines research. Yeadon retired from Pfizer with “the most senior research position”. He has sterling scientific credentials. You can read a fuller bio here, and you can find additional references to Yeadon at this blog here.
Yeadon, along with leading scientists in the fields of virology, immunology, and epidemiology, has been an outspoken critic of the Covid response--especially of lockdowns and the idea of vaccines as the only salvation and route to 'herd immunity.' 'Outspoken' means he states categorically that these response are based on "demonstrably false" propaganda put out by governments. Yesterday LifeSite published most of an interview with Yeadon. I found the interview so remarkable that I'm republishing most of it here.
You'll recall that yesterday in The Variant Scare And The Global Reset I stated that the Covid story put out by our globalist 'elites' (a term employed by Gov. Ron DeSantis) is one in a series of disinformational campaigns in which we can see
... the global elites marching in narratival lockstep--regarding Covid, regarding Trump, regarding Russia. All aided and abetted by a Tech - Social Media Complex.
In other words, there appears to be a guiding authority behind the narratival lockstep, and the various governments are players in a larger story in which they are not the main actors.
Conspiracy theory? That's what Yeadon addresses at length in the current interview, and he does so from the same perspective that I presented yesterday--the "variant scare" mongering. Since Yeadon is a world class expert in the relevant scientific field it's worth listening to what he has to say.
Here's a link to the LifeSite page--and you'll see that the inflammatory title is LifeSite quoting Yeadon directly:
Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’
‘Look out the window, and think, “why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?” Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.’
With that background, here are the seven points that Yeadon makes in the interview--as formulated by LifeSite. This should serve as a sort of table of contents:
There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”
Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”
Note that Yeadon doesn't claim to possess proof of this conspiracy, but he argues strongly that his view is logically based on what we are seeing in public policy thus far--the lies are demonstrable and there is no reasonable explanation. In legal terms, that can lead to a determination of Probable Cause. Also note that Yeadon is specifically speaking within the context of UK governance--which is decidedly different than the US constitutional order. I state that as a simple caveat. My second caveat--and I say this only to head off the usual smears--is that Yeadon is not at all an "anti-vaxxer." He's anti what he sees happening around the world.
Now, Yeadon himself:
“But in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything. It’s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don’t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.
“Or, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some ‘top-up’ vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants.
“Everything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong.”
‘Conspiracy’ and not just ‘convergent opportunism’
“But what I would like to do is talk about immune escape because I think that’s probably going to be the end game for this whole event, which I think is probably a conspiracy. Last year I thought it was what I called ‘convergent opportunism,’ that is a bunch of different stakeholder groups have managed to pounce on a world in chaos to push us in a particular direction. So it looked like it was kind of linked, but I was prepared to say it was just convergence.”
“I [now] think that’s naïve. There is no question in my mind that very significant powerbrokers around the world have either planned to take advantage of the next pandemic or created the pandemic. One of those two things is true because the reason it must be true is that dozens and dozens of governments are all saying the same lies and doing the same inefficacious things that demonstrably cost lives.
“And they are talking the same sort of future script which is, ‘We don’t want you to move around because of these pesky varmints, these “variants”’— which I call ‘samiants’ by the way, because they are pretty much the same — but they’re all saying this and they are all saying ‘don’t worry, there will be “top-up” vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.’ They’re all saying this when it is obviously nonsense.”
Possible end game: vaccine ‘passports’ tied to spending allowances, thorough control
“I think the end game is going to be, ‘everyone receives a vaccine’… Everyone on the planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab.
“When they do that every single individual on the planet will have a name, or unique digital ID and a health status flag which will be ‘vaccinated,’ or not … and whoever possesses that, sort of single database, operable centrally, applicable everywhere to control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that one human population database decide. And I think that’s what this is all about because once you’ve got that, we become playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that database want it.
“For example, you might find that after a banking reset that you can only spend through using an app that actually feeds off this [database], your ID, your name, [and] your health status flag.”
“And, yes, certainly crossing an international border is the most obvious use for these vaccine passports, as they are called, but I’ve heard talk of them already that they could be necessary for you to get into public spaces, enclosed public spaces. I expect that if they wanted to, you would not be able to leave your house in the future without the appropriate privilege on your app.
“But even if that’s not [the] true [intent of the vaccine campaign], it doesn’t matter, the fact that it could be true means everyone [reading] this should fight like crazy to make sure that [vaccine passport] system never forms.”
Gov’t lies, Big Pharma moves forward, medicine regulators get out of the way, and possible ‘mass-depopulation’
“But I will take you through this, Patrick, because I am qualified to comment. I don’t know what Vanden Bossche is about. There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous].
“Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They’re lying. Well, why would you do that?
“Here’s the other thing, in parallel, pharmaceutical companies have said, several of them, it will be quite easy for us to adjust our gene-based vaccines, and we can hasten them through development, and we can help you.
“And here’s the real scary part, global medicines regulators like [the U.S. Food and Drug Administration] FDA, the Japanese medicines agency, the European Medicines Agency, have gotten together and announced … since top-up vaccines will be considered so similar to the ones that we have already approved for emergency use authorization, we are not going to require the drug companies to perform any clinical safety studies.
“So, you’ve got on the one hand, governments and their advisers that are lying to you that variants are different enough from the current virus that, even if you’re immune from natural exposure or vaccination, you’re a risk and you need to come and get this top-up vaccine. So, I think neither of those are true. So why is the drug company making the top-up vaccines? And [with] the regulators having got out of the way — and if Yeadon is right, and I’m sure I am or I wouldn’t be telling you this — you go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.
“And if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people.
“And since I can’t think of a benign explanation for any of the steps: variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies … it’s not only that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just described: unknown, and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of potentially billions of people for no reason.
“I’m very worried … that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can’t think of any benign explanation.”
‘Absurdly impossible’ variants will escape immunity, ‘just a lie’
“If I can show you that one major thing that governments around the world are telling the people is a lie, you should take my 32 years of experienced opinion that says, most of it, if not all of it, is a lie.”
“The most different variant is only 0.3% different from the original sequence as emailed out of Wuhan in … January 2020. 0.3% [is] the one [variant] that is the most different on the planet so far. And now another way of saying it is, ‘all of the variants are not less than 99.7% identical to each other.’
“Now, you might be thinking, ‘hmm, .3%, is that enough [to escape immunity and become more dangerous]?’ The answer is no. Get away, ya know, get out of here …
“The human immune system is a thing of wonder. What it does is when it faces a new pathogen like this, you’ve got professional cells, they’re called professional antigen-presenting cells —their kind of rough tough things that tend not to succumb to viruses. And their job is to grab foreign things in the near environment and tear them limb from limb [inside the cell]. They really cut them up into hundreds of pieces. And then they present these pieces on the surfaces of their cell to other bits of your immune system, and amazingly, because of the variability that God and nature gave you, huge variability to recognize foreign things, and your body ends up using 15 to 20 different specific motifs that it spots about this virus. Their called epitopes, basically they’re just like little photographs of the details about this virus. That’s what they do. And that is what is called your repertoire, your immune repertoire is like 20 different accurate photographs, close-ups, of different bits of this virus.
“Now, if a tiny piece of the virus changes, like the .3% I’ve just described, if you are reinfected by that variant, your professional cells tear into that virus and cut it into pieces, present them again, and lo and behold, most of the pieces that you have already seen and recognized, are still there in the variants.
“There is absolutely no chance that all of them will fail to be recognized and that is what is required for immune escape, to escape your immunity. It must present to you as a new pathogen. It must be sufficiently different that, when it is cut up by your professional checker cells, it won’t find mostly the same thing it has seen before. And that is just absurdly impossible when you have only varied .3%, so it is 99.7% (similar).
“You can go and check that by looking at papers by a person called Alison Tarke. There is also Shane Crotty, and all of the other co-authors.
“I’ve chatted this over with several professors of immunology and they agreed with me, it’s like, ‘why are you asking me this?’
“So, I think that what I’ve just said is that governments and their advisors in multiple countries are lying about variants. That’s a massive thing! You should check it out. Your readers should check it out. If it’s true, don’t you think it’s terrifying?! It was when I realized it.
“So, they’re lying about variants, and then, of course, since [the variants] are not really different, you do not need a ‘top-up’ vaccine. Now you should be getting the hairs on the back of your neck up, because they are making them right now!”
“They are making billions of vials of it. And they will be available by the end of the year.
“And I think they’ll require people to first, be on the vaccine passport one-world database, and then it will roll up into the top-ups, and if it takes a bit longer it will take a bit longer.
“But this is not going away. It won’t go away until enough people, if they ever do, say ‘you’re a bunch of frauds and we are taking our freedoms back, so you can just stop doing this.’
“Because one person shouting into the wilderness and all of the other academics looking the other way, will have us just going down this pipe maybe a week later than if I hadn’t said anything, but we’re still going down to hell.
“So, that’s why I’m frightened.
“The variants aren’t different. I call them ‘samiants’… they’re pretty much the same. They’re not different. Therefore, you don’t need a top-up vaccine, so don’t go near any of them.”
‘Why is my government lying to me?’ Because ‘they are going to kill you.’
“[And if you recognize that our governments are involved in a major verifiable lie], don’t just turn your computer off and go to supper. Stop. Look out the window, and think, ‘why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?’ Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.
“The eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you. I have no idea what it will actually be, but it won’t be a vaccine because you don’t need one. And it won’t kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that.
“It could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal.
“That’s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world’s population. And I think that’s what they’re doing.”
“Now I don’t know [for certain] that they’re going to use that [system] to kill you, but I can’t think of a benign reason, and with that power they certainly could harm you, or control you, so you should object [and strenuously oppose it].”
People can’t deal with this level of evil, but Soviets, Hitler, Mao show its possibility
“It’s become absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people, friends, acquaintances … and they can tell I’m telling them something important, but they get to the point [where I say] ‘your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death and that of your children,’ and they can’t begin to engage with it. And I think maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank their understanding of it because it is too difficult. And my concern is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil…
“But I remind you of what happened in Russia in the 20th Century, what happened in 1933 to 1945, what happened in, you know, Southeast Asia in some of the most awful times in the post-war era. And, what happened in China with Mao and so on.
“We’ve only got to look back two or three generations. All around us there are people who are as bad as the people doing this. They’re all around us. So, I say to folks, the only thing that really marks this one out, is its scale.
“But actually, this is probably less bloody, it’s less personal, isn’t it? The people who are steering this … it’s going to be much easier for them. They don’t have to shoot anyone in the face. They don’t have to beat someone to death with a baseball bat, or freeze them, starve them, make them work until they die. All of those things did happen two or three generations back and our grandparents or great grandparents were either victims of this, or they were actually members of it, or at least they witnessed it from overseas. That’s how close we are.
“And all I’m saying is, some shifts like that are happening again, but now they are using molecular biology.
“And the people going along with it, I think they would probably say, ‘I was only following orders,’ which we have heard before.
“But I know, because I have talked to lots of people, and some of them have said ‘I don’t want to believe that you are right, so I’m going to just put it away because if it is true, I can’t handle it.’ And I think … all you need to do is find a good reason to tell people, ‘Don’t take the vaccine unless you’re a medical risk of dying from the virus!’ That seems to me a pretty good line!”
Towards a solution – ‘We need God’
“I’m a scientist, and I can tell you, talking to non-scientists, using science as a tool, will not work. It will fail.
“So, we need philosophers, people who understand logic, religion, something like that, [they have] got to wrestle with this, and start talking in a language people will understand. Because if we leave it with scientists, people like me, even though I’m well-intentioned, I’m a gabbling alien as far as most people in the street are concerned. They won’t believe the government will lie to them, they don’t believe the government would ever do anything that will harm them, but they are [doing such things].”
Finally, in an email correspondence, Dr. Yeadon concluded, “I have latest taken to signing off with ‘May God save us’, because I think we need God now more than at any time since WW2.”
UPDATE: Who else has noticed that requiring college students to be vaxxed seems to be the new thing? Let's see ... College students are, basically, not at risk at all from Covid. BUT, they are at a prime age for reproducing. If you were a depopulation fanatic who has evinced a remarkable fascination with the use of vaccines for eugenic and demographic purposes--in other words, if you were somebody like Bill Gates and his cohort--who would you be most concerned with vaxxing: seniors or twenty somethings?
I appreciate his scientific insights, less so his political prognostications. The Governments of the West are in lockstep, and that is understandable, but Israel is an independent, scientifically advanced nation, so are Japan, Russia - I'm not sure I see their leaders being in thrall to the Great Reset New World Order, yet they've also overreacted to Covid.ReplyDelete
My contention is that "Science" has morphed into a religion, and it holds sway over the minds of most of the worlds denizens, even those disparate in culture. Some use the religion corruptly (the American Left), and some are genuine adherents (Boris Johnson and the Israelis).
Good points: i too have been baffled by the 'malevolent' power uniting all countries into this insanity. Your theory is the first which actually makes sense to me.Delete
Seems to be a lot of sneaky things one could hide in these "vaccines"ReplyDelete
The RC church accused Kenya in 2014: "Kenya’s Catholic bishops: Tetanus vaccine is birth control in disguise"
"the bishops appearing before the parliamentary health committee said they had tested the vaccine privately and were shocked to find it was laced with a birth control hormone called beta human chorionic gonadotropin"
"...vaccine, which was targeted at women in the reproductive ages of 14 to 49, and excluded boys and men"
"WHO carried out similar vaccination campaigns in Mexico in 1993 and in Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994."
Oh man. When Gates is on record about “depopulating” the world, I can believe every word of this.ReplyDelete
Seek salvation in The Lord Jesus Christ gentlemen; it’s later than you think.
Shared this on Parler with several appapro hash tags.
Wife and I had this very conversation 2 days ago. Is this the mark? Will we be denied access because we are vax deniers? Scary times.ReplyDelete
Anon - according to this Biblical Scholar, the answer is “no”:Delete
Great article. Thank you!ReplyDelete
Thank you for this very important message. Even if there are no dangerous ingredients in future vaccines, which is doubtful, the intention seems to be to keep us under restrictions perpetually. You stated "people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil…" It was said of Robespierre that he loved humanity, but people...not so much. Mao, Hitler Stalin...these were visionaries with glorified ideas of the perfectibility of humanity, and as Heidigger stated morality is what we make of it. 'Sein', 'existentialism' and modern science indicate ways forward, but of course religion and old-fashioned ideas of morality must be abandoned. As Humpty Dumpty stated "Who is the master?"ReplyDelete
Yeah great information Mark!ReplyDelete
My meager question is this... With all of the false information, manipulation, lack of evidence, mountains of opposing evidence... When is one of these states and their Attorney Generals going to step up and start a serious fraud investigation? Because we NEED to be in a courtroom with this.
That MAY sound over the top but I am basing my question on a little known court case that didn't get the attention it deserves. https://www.theportugalnews.com/news/court-rules-in-favour-of-german-tourists-deprived-of-freedom-in-azores/55543
The courts found several issues with the over all turn of events that took place but the one I am hinging on is the failures of PCR testing as scientific evidence... A test were STILL using today.
An interesting follow up to that case has been the response to the ruling attacking the judges in the case. https://www.portugalresident.com/portuguese-judges-who-queried-reliability-of-covid-tests-at-risk-of-being-disciplined/
Same test that has tested motor oil, Coke, goat snot and dozens of other things as positive for covid. The issue being the amplifier used rendering just about everything "positive".
We can no longer trust our federal government to enter into these things. So where's a Ron DeSantis or the likes with a big enough pair to step up with a legitimate legal vs political peacocking inquiry?
It doesn't take the feds, doesn't take a federal agency, doesn't take international law or larger conspiracies to run that out.
My bet is that the states are more interested in the bank they are making from the Feds to pay off massive budget deficits keep them pretty complicit.
I'd love to see Fauci in THAT interview!!!
Considering that we have seen hundreds of instances where local governments have intentionally lied and manipulated data to keep cities closed (New Orleans for example) I'm honestly perplex why the only cases so far have been about churches and over extensions of emergency orders (CA, MI, etc)
Since you mention lies and Fauci, further down is a link to an interview with a fairly eminent guy whose views I discussed here:Delete
Former head of of biostatistics, epidemiology and research design at Rockefeller University.
At this link he has a lot of interesting stuff to say, and if you scroll down he responds to a question re Fauci:
On Anthony Fauci
“Let’s talk about real numbers like American politicians like Anthony Fauci spill at any point in time … it’s a different number every month because the politics are changing … At some point in time he was a scientist, but he has been in a highly political administrative position now for — how long? — 40 years.
“So it was politically importune [inopportune?] to say what I’m saying now — so It’s politics, it’s not science.”
The Wittkowski link now saysDelete
"The page you are looking for no longer exists or has moved."
My bad. I can't edit comments. It's worth reading.
Thx. Yeah, it's worth reading, incl. onDelete
"it is lockdowns that give the greatest chance of creating new variants...."
Here's my totally unqualified surmise.Delete
'Variants', i.e., mutations, are gonna happen. Lockdowns or no. However, the danger of lockdowns is that by preventing exposure to the virus--and thus, gradually developing T-cell immunity that will work with those variants--any exposure to those variants will be more traumatic than necessary.
I'm probably not expressing that well, but think about it. As experts have explained, variants/mutations are inevitable because that's how viruses work. Lockdowns won't prevent that, but they will make the experience worse. Here's Wittkowski:
“Viruses mutate … they have evolutionary pressure to mutate in two dimensions. One is the disease gets milder because a virus that kills the host can spread less. So disease severity is not good for the spread of the virus … so that more and more people get infected, remain alive, spread the virus. It can become more infectious and in the end everyone gets infected and no-one knows about it anymore because there’s no phenotype anymore … that is the normal course of evolution.”
I take that to mean what I said the other day--mutations (variants) are a good thing for us, because mutations inevitably weaken the virus. Lockdowns, by preventing widespread transmission, slow down that mutation-mitigation process. What we really want is widespread infection because that will increase the rate of mutation and the rate of mitigation.
All laws and powers are abused no matter how righteous the intent of the law or power. That should have been self evident prior to covid and should be a glaring red light atop a clanging civil liberties alarm now.ReplyDelete
It’s not the use of this now, but the potentiality of use in the near future that is the problem and this crosses all nations and, as this points out, medical technology.
My current old iPhone that I am typing this on had an update to notify me and others of our covid status. I turned it off. Who knows if it really is. I suppose I could pay to get the developer tools to find out. I got my first covid vax a week back. How can I be sure that this was or will be in the future not given to Apple? Paranoid? Nahhh, realist.
Either way, we, the US and everyone else, are setting ourselves up to be completely controlled and, yes, killed off even though I think that latter event is unlikely, but not out of the realm of possibility.
OTOH, one can argue that Yeadon is deliberately presenting a worst case scenario--deliberate and proactive depopulation. His argument is that the tools are there and nobody's discussing these nightmare scenarios--but they should be because nobody can foretell who will get their hands on these tools.Delete
OTOH, we know that those most aggressively promoting all this are eugenists who are obsessed with population control. Is it so hard to imagine--given all we've seen in history of governments deceiving populations for the 'greater good' by starting wars, etc.--that these tools would be used to sterilize portions of demographic groups or even entire populations for that greater eugenic 'good' of population control. Or refinement. Or however you wish to put it.
My answer is: No, that's not at all hard to imagine. And then Yeadon's nightmare still remains as a possibility.
That’s the rub, you can’t waive it off. I wish we could, but we can’t. Human life is inconsequential when it comes to power and money.Delete
Curious...why did you get the jab? Were you worried about the virus? Health issues? Compelled by work?
(I won't call it a vaccine bc it doesn't qualify for that definition).
I think you shouldReplyDelete
'Follow the money'. Who has been getting richer and more powerful? One would be Bill Gates, Dr Fauci, owners of Twitter, Facebook, etc.
It is all very interesting and sensational. In the spirit of full disclosure (as if anyone would give a hoot) I do not have the scientific background to comment on his stated evidence. So, I'm left with two general areas of questions. Who is Dr. Yeadon? and how could his forecast work in the long run? Of course, I am truly impressed with his credentials, very impressive. Dr. Yeadon comes across like a sincerely and God-ly, caring man. He states his purpose is pure, and I haven't read anything to suggest otherwise he is ethical and honest. But the is a giant leap of faith from weaving all these theories and facts together which paint a picture of the worst kind of hell the world has seen to date. It's believable on its face when considered in the light of the earlier monsters the world has suffered -so I am, predisposed to fi8nding it believable. But then there is that leap to the other side of the canyon - that the government is going to kill you and your children.ReplyDelete
How would that work? I do follow Dr. Yeadon's line of reasoning but it just assumes too much to get to the other side. It would take a level of trust that is outside the realm of human capacity of trusting their fellow man to work. It is one thing to believe that government is using this pandemic to muscle in their "way" and, of course, for Big Teck and Big Business to take huge advantage of the opportunity. His own company would also fall in that group. One question I saw was would we not notice millions of people dropping dead after having gotten the "shots?" Even, as Dr. Yeadon points out, that the method could be manipulated to trigger the event down the road. But, still, after the shots are widespread in mass numbers and then next year or two or however many, people all over the world start dropping dead someone might make the connection.
I do agree he has done the world a huge service by using his platform to sound a clarion call for action. God bless him. I imagine he has done that at a cost. That is also a point of creditability in his favor.
I support Dr. Yeadon in his efforts. I find him creditable and worth listening to, and spreading his the word on this very important matter.
What we need is more Dr. Yeadons, many more. We also need a leader. We need a captain to steer this ship through narrow, rocky, straits in stormy seas. There are a great many wonderful, competent brilliant people on the side of sanity, like Dr. Yeadon, but, they have effectively isolated us. We must find a way and a place to share ideas and plan action.
Mark, I am almost certain that Yeadon had a wikipedia page not very long ago. That outfit throws people down the memory hole with a frightening frequency these days. They did the same thing to Chris Martenson back in February of 2020 — when the media and politicians actually denied the very existence of Covid. (Those were the days!)ReplyDelete
It doesn't get bigger than this. Hang around Instapundit or PL if you want to play about in the mud puddles but over here at MIH there is world changing issues discussed.ReplyDelete
One side issue that Dr. Yeadon's alarm raises is Trump. If the Jab is a lie, if the entire Scamdemic is a lie, where does Trump fit into that? There's no denying that he was instrumental in getting these jabs ready so quickly-- heck, he takes credit for it at every opportunity. But even so, Trump doesn't fit Yeadon's narrative that the Scamdemic and concomitant inoculation program are part of a concerted scheme.
It is possible to explain the lies as convergent opportunism rather than a globalist conspiracy of mass death. In this view the Scamdemic started as the brainchild of the CCP and the Kleptocrats (and for Kleptocrats you can include the Global Cabal if you like). The idea was to engineer a relatively typical virus (highly infectious but not more deadly than other coronairuses) and use mass media and government dezinformatsya to whip it into a panic mass hysteria. All with an eye to getting rid of Trump who, as of 2019 was cruising easily to reelection. That it succeeded beyond their wildest dreams is an understatement. How did Trump respond? When his initial response to downplay the virus resulted in outrage he tacked the other way and opted for Warp Speed vaccine development. The evidence is that the Kleptocracy wasn't prepared for this. Their narrative shapers all ridiculed it. Not something they'd have done if the vax was intended all along. This also threw a wrench in their plan to keep the Panic going as long as possible. When the jabs actually were ready as Trump said, the Kleptocrats had a problem. They couldn't let go of the Panic but couldn't deny the Jab. So they shifted plans. Plus, Big Pharma stood to make billions. So now the Jab is good but Evil Killer Mutant Variants mean the Kontrols must remain.
In sum, this may be a case of both/and rather than either/or. Yes, Yeadon may be right that as of now the Kleptocracy is figuring out how to leverage this Jab and the Scamdemic to full advantage in a coordinated effort. But it could also be true that this is something that has evolved rather than played out by design. Yeadon is absolutely right that we must not allow the Jab to become in any way mandatory or a condition for access to travel, work, etc...
"use mass media and government dezinformatsya to whip it into a panic mass hysteria"Delete
The numbers just don't add up...
"mass hysteria creating mass psychogenic illness and hysterical contagion brought about by lockdowns and media coverage highlighting and exaggerating the “pandemic.” These are real psychological conditions."
"The severity of the virus from country to country is a reflection of media coverage, not the other way around. This explains how the Swine flu during the Obama administration did not get out of hand. The testing and reporting was stopped"