A "small number" here, a "small number" there--pretty soon all these side effects add up to a significant number. In fact, they already have.
Israel examining heart inflammation cases in people who received Pfizer COVID shot
By Reuters Staff￼￼
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel’s Health Ministry said on Sunday it is examining a small number of cases of heart inflammation in people who had received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, though it has not yet drawn any conclusions.
Ya know what? I'm just gonna say "no thank you" to heart inflammmation. That's right--I can draw my own conclusions.
OT, not sure where to put thisReplyDelete
Can't vouch for the accuracy, I just saw it on FB in passing, but if true, does provide some hope:
"Let me explain why the establishment is so terrified of the ongoing audit.
This is the first audit of its kind in the history of US elections.
Currently, an understaffed tiny federal agency (EAC) and 2 private testing companies (Pro V&V and SLI Compliance) are responsible for certification of our nation’s voting systems.
One of the chief employees at the EAC is a former 10-year executive of Dominion Voting Systems.
Pro V&V and SLI Compliance like Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic are all members of CISA's Sector Coordinating Council.
The same council that issued the "most secure election in American history" statement shortly after the election on Nov. 12th.
The testing from Pro V&V and SLI Compliance had been characterized as “superficial” and “cursory testing” by election security experts.
Enter Cyber Ninjas.
This is an unprecedented thorough audit of an election. From the voter rolls to the physical paper ballots and through the entire electronic voting system.
This includes the election management system, ballot images, adjudication machines, compact flash drives, USB drives, audit logs, election database servers, chain of custody documents, etc.
Everything will be audited under one all-encompassing audit by individuals not associated with the government or voting machine companies.
Instead of a "superficial" testing of the machines or hand recounts that just run the same printed ballot images through scanners, this will be the first thorough independent audit of a US election in modern history.
VivaBarnesLaw talked about that tonight. What's to worry about an thorough audit of that secure election, right?Delete
I posted about this the other day when I figured out Maricopa County's election board (the guys trying to stop this for 5 months) was a 4/1 Repub majority... That actually set me back in my seat.
The audit overall, I'm not sure I'm buying it right now. (No offense to you as a person for posting it)
I've been trying for weeks to find the actual criteria being used in this audit. Thus far, no disclosure to my knowledge, I've been asking everywhere, and I've been looking HARD.
All of this hype about being open and making everything public. I see lots of cameras, pretty shirt colors, media hype, media misinformation, the typical party propaganda... But no actual audit criteria explaining the nuts and bolts of the pony show.
The word "forensic" to me is like the word "dossier"... And my government has taught me to be relentlessly skeptical!
I'm holding my breath for a while and hoping that this isn't what I expect it to be. (I'd like to be VERY wrong for a change), but for for the moment I'm erring on the side of shenanigans.
Devilman, I wonder if your not being able to find any details is intentional. The auditors don't want anyone to know prior to the conclusions. That way the left can't commence their attack until the conclusions are on the table.Delete
If true, excellent! May it be true!ReplyDelete
@Devilman, the only thing that makes me hugely skeptical of your position (audit is a pony show) : uniparty. We're no longer repub vs dem or even right versus left. We are now elite vs non-elite. IMHO. Mark A.ReplyDelete
@ Mark ADelete
I'm in total agreement on Uniparty, so much so that I infrequently mention Repub and Dem... I should have better clarified what I was getting at.
I've read several dozen articles over the last 5 months on this Maricopa county ordeal and I've probably skipped over 200+ headlines on it.
The messaging, from every "right leaning" website out there was pushing the same narrative "the democrats were suing the AZ GOP". Democrats, democrats, democrats... That board suing the AZ senate isn't Dem, it's GOP!!
I didn't realize this until the other day when I was reading a transcript of one of Trump's attorneys talking about "the latest suit" being brought by the 'one democratic member' of the Maricopa Election Board.
What set me back so hard was the reality that our media, the people who bash the snot out of CNN all day spent 5 months not informing their audiences that in all reality the majority of these suits were being brought by Repubs, enjoined in SOME cases by democrats... But not by democrats.
I get really peeved at what I call the "Repub worshipers" and their constant cover and defence the Grand Ole Party. 🙄
"The auditors don't want anyone to know prior to the conclusions. That way the left can't commence their attack until the conclusions are on the table."
That doesn't jive with what they organizers have claimed. The "what" is a long list of things they have droned on about. So that list of attack is public.
The "how" you are auditing is going to be attacked no matter.
Lastly, there is no way you can keep a room full of random volunteers, with open registration "quiet"...
Understand that I am looking at this within the scope of words the group is using... "The most transparent means possible". Ok, then be transparent!
I've sat though and preformed too many audits, you can audit for effect... Or you can audit... I could do either of those processes in front of cameras with volunteers and give you two completely separate results.
Not trying to sound overly defensive / negative here, i'm just long out of benefiting doubt where anything involving this election comes into play.
I also know the Governments track record of investigating it's on goings. The list of "situations buried" vs "situations addressed" is 1000/1.
If I am wrong about this... To know I will humbly apologize for my standing and fully admit it.