Pages

Thursday, August 8, 2019

The Sociology Of Mass Killings As Suicide

Here we are, waiting for something to break in the Barr/Durham Russia Hoax investigation--last night Joe diGenova said it would break in September, so that leaves us with a month to go. In the meantime, we have this business of mass killings and the outcry by the Left to "do something." But what? What problem are we supposed to fix? What's cause in all this, and what's effect?

This morning Rod Dreher put out a very long blog, quoting extensively from other writers: America’s Nervous Breakdown. The entire blog is very worthwhile, but I want to provide a substantial excerpt from the lead article that Dreher cites and quotes from: The Deadly Boredom of ‘A Meaningless Life’, by Terry Newman, who is "an MA student in the Sociology Department at Concordia University in Montreal." And a reminder--the name of this blog is "meaning in history." The author thinks she's doing sociology, and to an extent she is, but at the root of all this is philosophy--ideas have consequences, and our way of life is based on ideas:

These recent shooters fit a similar profile. They were outsiders, ... But there is another factor at play here, too. Before a youth makes the decision to murder, before the gun is stashed in his backpack, before his state of mental health is so deteriorated that he commits the unthinkable, what has happened to him? It’s important to remember that these murders are also, in most cases, suicides. 
In his 2008 article School Shooting as a Culturally Enforced Way of Expressing Suicidal Hostile Intentions, psychiatrist Antonio Preti summarized existing research on school shootings to the effect that “suicidal intent was found in most cases for which there was detailed information on the assailants.” The research also indicated that “among students, homicide perpetrators were more than twice as likely as their victims to have been bullied by their peers, and also were described as loners and poorly integrated into school activities… In most of the ascertained cases, perpetrators prepared a well-organized plan, and often communicated details about it to acquaintances or friends, who failed to report threats because they did not consider them serious or were embarrassed or ignorant of where to go for help. The most antisocial peers sometimes approved the plan, sharing the same anger against the stated target of violence.” 
Preti’s article predated the rise of some of the most notorious web sites—including 8chan, which was shut down this week after several mass shootings were linked to its users. But the nihilistic phenomenon these killers represent predates modern social-media culture. Indeed, it predates digital communication, and even broadcast media more generally. 
In 1897, French sociologist Émile Durkheim noted that suicides overall were increasing in society. But there were differences among the affected populations, he noticed. Men were more likely than women to commit suicide—though the chances decreased if the man was married and had children. Durkheim observed that social groups that were more religious exhibited lower suicide rates. (Catholics were less likely to commit suicide than Protestants, for instance.) Durkheim also noted that many people who killed themselves were young, and that the prevalence of such suicides was linked to their level of social integration: When a person felt little sense of connection or belonging, he could be led to question the value of his existence and end his life. 
Durkheim labelled this form of suicide as “anomic” (others being “egoistic,” “altruistic” and “fatalistic”). Durkheim believed that these feelings of anomie assert themselves with special force at moments when society is undergoing social, political or economic upheaval—especially if such upheavals result in immediate and severe changes to everyday life. 
Durkheim came from a long line of devout Jews. His father, grandfather and great grandfather had all been rabbis. And so even though he chose to pursue an academic career, his experiences taught him to respect the mental and psychological support that religious communities supplied to their members, as well as the role that ritual plays in the regulation of social behavior. In the absence of such regulation, he believed, individuals and even whole societies were at risk of falling into a state of anomie, whereby common values and meanings fall by the wayside. The resulting void doesn’t provide people with a sense of freedom, but rather rootlessness and despair. 
Durkheim’s thesis has largely stood the test of time, though other scholars have reformulated it for modern audiences. In his 1955 book The Sane Society, for instance, Erich Fromm wrote that, “in the nineteenth century, the problem was that God is dead. In the twentieth century, the problem is that man is dead.” He described the twentieth century as a period of “schizoid-self alienation,” and worried that men would destroy “their world and themselves because they cannot stand any longer the boredom of a meaningless life.” 
In her 2004 book Rampage: The Social Roots of School Shootings, Katherine Newman described findings gleaned from over 100 interviews in Arkansas and Kentucky. The male adolescent shooters at the center of her study, she concluded, “shared a belief that demonstrating strength by planned attacks on their respective institutions with (too) easily available guns would somehow mitigate their unbearable feelings of inadequacy as males and bring longed-for respect from peers.” Ten years later, in a 2014 article titled The Socioemotional Foundations of Suicide: A Microsociological View of Durkheim’s Suicide, sociologists Seth Abrutyn and Anna Mueller set out to update Durkheim’s theory about how social integration and moral regulation affect suicidality. “The greater degree to which individuals feel they have failed to meet expectations and others fail to ‘reintegrate’ them, the greater the feelings of shame and, therefore, anomie,” they concluded. “The risk of suicidal thoughts, attempts, and completions, in addition to violent aggression toward specific or random others, is a positive function of the intensity, persistence, and pervasiveness of identity, role, or status-based shame and anomie.” 
Writing in the 1890s, Durkheim was highly conscious of all the ways that industrial capitalism corroded traditional forms of social regulation in society, often at the expense of religious—and even governmental—authorities. ... But if he were to visit us in 2019, Durkheim would be surprised at the extent to which once-dominant ideas with no connection to economics have been marginalized as regressive and hateful—such as nationalism, patriotism and even masculinity. 
This is one reason why so many people now feel unmoored. As Canadian science fiction writer Donald Kingsbury eloquently put it in his novel Courtship Rite, “Tradition is a set of solutions for which we have forgotten the problems. Throw away the solution and you get the problem back.” ...

16 comments:

  1. Yes to all of this, which brings us to current events.

    Obama succeeded in transforming our society in many ways, not least of which was weaponizing many federal agencies in service to political ends. And one of the most significant casualties of this change was the demise of the "rule of law" as a bedrock principle that glued us together.

    This decline was gradual initially, but reached a tipping point when Comey exonerated Hillary and everyone knew it was corruption of the highest magnitude. This cancer soon became a mortal wound in which an overt coup against a duly elected president was normalized. How far we have fallen.

    Most every sane citizen is desperately hoping that Barr will repair this damage and chart a course back to our core principles of honesty, decency, and respect for the rule of law. Time is of the essence because we are now tearing ourselves apart as a nation and culture, and many innocents are literally dying in the interim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Deep State's contempt for We the People is hardly the tip of the iceberg. We have very fundamental societal questions to resolve; some that no civilization has successfully answered as they sank into decay, and some that almost certainly have never been encountered before in human history. (In my opinion)
      Tom S.

      Delete
  2. This is not directly on point, but the observations above reminded me of a talk Charles Murray gave some years ago literally, about the anomie and nihilism (my words, not his) in the culture--first in Europe, then seeping into American culture by way of our Democrats. From 2009...
    http://www.aei.org/publication/the-happiness-of-the-people/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Question concerning Coupgate: Could the Storzk McCabe lawsuits be primarily fishing expeditons to attemp to tease out intel on the DoJ investigations via "discovery"? As a non-lawyer I'm just wondering if certain parties might hope to get a window into the investigations via that route.
    Tom S.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I don't think that could work. They would not be allowed to discover stuff that was being used in an active investigation. To be honest, I'm not sure what's going on here. It's seems like harassment, but I just can't see it accomplishing much. Perhaps just desperation--doing what Nadler wants.

      Delete
  4. Yes, perhaps just noise in an attempt to distract.
    Tom S.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not as if they're gonna garner any sympathy.

      Delete
    2. sundance is scathing:

      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/08/andrew-mccabe-files-federal-civil-lawsuit-against-doj-and-fbi-claims-trump-carried-out-unconstitutional-plan-against-him/

      But here's his real bottom line, beyond the very enjoyable invective:

      "Again, as with the earlier Strzok lawsuit, both are not going through the process within the Department of Labor for a wrongful termination complaint. Instead both are using federal courts in an effort to construct a narrative of sorts.

      "The motive here is 100% political obfuscation, and the same Lawfare team is involved in the construct."

      But that narrative will resonate with no one outside the Dem caucus inside the House. Pathetic and desperate.

      Delete
  5. Throughout human history, every day, people have murdered and tortured other people. Every day.
    So what’s all the fuss? Does anybody actually dwell on this?
    At the dinner table, do we tell our children about whatever terrible thing we learned about that day? I believe the answer is no. So why would anybody choose to spread this kind of “news”?
    Using human victims as ammunition against their political enemies is the obvious Democrat tactic of the day. It might be self-destructive. I wonder how long they’ll continue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "It might be self-destructive. I wonder how long they’ll continue."

      If I were a betting man, I'd be betting with you.

      Delete
  6. I don't know if this is true but I read that a lot of these shooters don't have a father in the home. If true, couple this with our society kicking God out of school, government, even out of liberal churches. Add in the toxic culture that America has devolved to and the war on men.

    Yes, the war on men. Is it any wonder that so many young men go down the path of hopelessness and despair?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Virtually every single one had absent father issues.

      Delete
    2. if you spend much time talking to young men (under 30), regardless of race or socio-economics, the unifying theme is a sense of purposelessness.
      Tom S.

      Delete
    3. I just did a post re drug use, linking an article.

      Delete