Yes, Robert Malone still exists, lives and breathes--although our medical establishment would prefer that you not be aware of him. He battles on.
Perhaps you saw today that the VAERS reporting database on "adverse events" resulting from "vaccines" is up to 6,985 fatalities? By any historical standards that's catastrophic. What's more, that is almost certainly not the whole story. Meanwhile, the push to shoot up the little people continues:
The risk of children under 18 developing serious illness or dying from Covid-19 is very slim, said researchers, who found a death rate of 0.005% in England—lower than initially thought https://t.co/hSZl69Sc9S via @WSJ— Monica Gandhi MD, MPH (@MonicaGandhi9) July 9, 2021
Here is a fun game. Can anyone else spot the logic and data analysis flaws in this "Nature" analysis? To both Jill and I, they are immediately obvious. Maybe a red pill is required. To us, this looks like overt propaganda.https://t.co/1ZJFvemuOg— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 8, 2021
"Adverse events"? What are those?
If you were wondering what the adverse event "Cranial venous thrombosis" actually means, then read this article.https://t.co/Sz8n91CPQq— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 8, 2021
Camilla Canepa was operated on by Gianluigi Zona, director of the neurosurgical and neuro-traumatological clinic of the San Martino hospital: “I had never seen a brain that was affected by such an extensive and severe thrombosis.”
The neurosurgeon on duty in San Martino that night was Alessandro d’Andrea, who also called the chief physician to his side at the operating table. “We decided to have a decompression craniotomy, in which the skull is opened to relieve internal pressure.”
Zona recounted the experience: “All venous sinuses were blocked with thrombi, a scenario I have never seen in my many years in this profession. Think of the venous sinus as the river in the middle of a valley where several streams converge. If a dam is built in the middle of the watercourse, the river swells and the tributaries can no longer drain at this point, so that the pressure rises upstream.
“I’m neither a virologist, nor an epidemiologist, nor a coroner, but given the image I saw in the girl’s head, it is clear that we are dealing with something that is not normal.”
The parents of the 18-year-old who died, told the media: “She had no disease.” Last week, the prosecutor of Genoa, which coordinates the ongoing investigations, will instruct the Pavia coroner to perform the autopsy on the body of Camilla Canepa, the eighteen year old who died after the vaccine. The girl allegedly suffered from chronic platelet deficiency, a “familial autoimmune thrombocytopenia”. This is what investigators have learned from the first reports of the doctors.
But the girl’s family, assisted by the lawyer Angelo Paone, is firm on this point. “Camilla had no disease,” explained their lawyer. Supporting their claim, are two different CT scans. She had undergone the two scans, and was discharged after the first one that had not shown the situation of the thrombosis in progress, but immediately transferred to the hospital after the second showing that her health had been compromised.
That's an adverse event.
July 8, 2021
Here are some of the highlights he revealed in the interview. Firstly, Dr Malone stated: ‘In the Security and Exchange Commission filings for both Pfizer and Moderna, there’s explicit statements that acknowledge that these are gene therapy-based (vaccines) and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) perceives them as such.’
He brilliantly explained the science behind the vaccines by using the metaphor of an industrial robot used to build cars. The RNA in this metaphor is the code that a hacker is inserting into the bit stream to make these robots (your cells) make something they would not have otherwise made. In this case, it’s the spike protein that’s recognised by the immune system triggering a response.
‘In a conventional vaccine you can precisely calculate how much protein goes into your shoulder because it’s fixed and predictable, but in the case of these genetic vaccines you can’t,’ he warned.
‘You can’t calculate how long it produces this protein and how much protein it makes and exactly what cells in your body the protein goes into. Conventional vaccines go around your cell, but for these gene therapy-based vaccines the target is your cell.’
When I asked whether he thought the UK (which was the first country in the world to approve the Pfizer vaccine on December 2, 2020) rushed through their approval of it, Dr Malone quickly responded: ‘I wouldn’t say maybe, I would say they did. You can’t take a process that normally takes a decade and push it down into nine months and not cut corners.’
He explained that regulatory agencies such as America’s FDA and Britain’s MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) have different safety check lists for vaccines and gene therapies. Typically, genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity studies are not done with vaccines, but are done with gene therapy products.
Dr Malone revealed that in the face of the crisis, apparently there was a global consensus with these regulatory agencies that they were going to suspend their gene therapy checklist, or if they were done, they were not done in a ‘vigorous’ way. He said this was the biggest mistake of the regulatory agencies.
Children are at very low risk of hospitalisation and death from Covid-19, Dr Malone confirmed. In their age group, the risks overwhelmingly outweigh the benefits from the vaccine.
The risks are the cardiotoxicity events (pericarditis and myocarditis) being recorded in the adverse event databases coming out of Israel, Norway and the Netherlands, to name but a few.
Given that the MHRA and FDA have approved the Pfizer vaccine for 12 to 15-year-olds and have been actively encouraging the use of it across multiple age groups, Dr Malone likened this application to the situation where ‘if you give a three-year-old a hammer, everything becomes a nail’.
Ivor Cummins' newest video about COVID-19:ReplyDelete
a Clinical Trial on Facemasks in Children
In the UK:ReplyDelete
Up to 40% of 'Covid hospital patients' infected with Delta variant may have been admitted for a different illness, official figures suggest
A total of 1,904 people in England had spent at least one night in hospital with the mutant virus by June 21
But 739 (39%) may have gone to hospital for other condition and tested positive through routine NHS testing
Experts said findings show chunk of admissions reported by Government every day will be 'incidental cases’
IOW, a sign that the "scariant" is just that. They want to scare the public into accepting more lockdowns. As the teachers unions are already suggesting for the fall.Delete
Leaked Confidentiality Agreement Shows Moderna, NIAID Filed Covid Vaccine Candidate in 2019ReplyDelete
Serious questions need to be answered, including: Were Moderna, NIAID and Baric aware that COVID-19 was circulating in mid-December 2019, or did they have knowledge far before that such a vaccine would soon be in demand?
So much has happened over the past year that it may be hard to remember what life was like pre-COVID. But let’s flash back to December 2019, when the idea of social distancing, compulsory masking and lockdowns would have been met with disbelief and outrage by most Americans.
At that time, most were blissfully unaware of the pandemic that would change the world in the next few months. It wasn’t until December 31, 2019, that the COVID-19 outbreak was first reported from Wuhan, China,1 and at this point it was only referred to as cases of viral pneumonia, not a novel coronavirus.2 I say “most” because it seems some people may have been aware of something lurking much earlier than it appeared.
In confidential documents3 revealed by the U.K.’s Daily Expose, Moderna, together with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), sent mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill December 12, 2019 — raising significant red flags. As The Daily Expose reported:4
"raising significant questions"Delete
Like, Why, then, were these supposed "vaccines" withheld so long, while treatments were also being banned?
A few months back, I posted a link to a TGP story noting that NIAID sent the coronavirus vaccine from Moderna to UNC for Baric to review. I'm glad there's now a second source.Delete
Moderna states in the CNBC link below they didn't get the genetic sequence of the virus until January 11, 2020 and they didn't send the first vaccine candidate to the NIH until February 24, 2020. Time for the Moderna executives and all involved from NIAID to testify under oath. I give Senator Rand Paul the floor.
See an interview with 3 leftist Epidemiology etc. types, where they concede that DJT was right on *at least* one major aspect of the covid crisis:ReplyDelete
"SB: We applied a *uniform* intervention strategy, to something that was disproportionately affecting particular communities. We locked down society, but transmission doesn’t happen at the level of society: It happens at the level of households and workplaces.
And we didn’t really do a lot in those places, so a lot of the workplaces declared “essential” continued, and we didn’t provide those people options in terms of their households.
For example, we could have made temporary living spaces available, especially for people in multi-generational households.
With HIV, we don’t provide pre-exposure prophylaxis to everybody. We don’t provide birth control to 70-year-old women.
We have targeted interventions, for folks who really will benefit from them. And we just didn’t do that here, to the *harm of all* of us.
VP:... The other kind of failure is the *cultural* failure, which I view as several interlocking things. One is when you have a very polarizing political figure making statements, some of the response from the public health community was to oppose the polarizing figure *because* he’s polarizing, not necessarily because what he says is always wrong. As bad as Trump is, as much as I personally disliked him, he was probably *right* on opening schools....."