Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA "vaccine" technology runs an interesting Twitter feed. Unfortunately, much of what he writes is geared toward professionals in his field and is, thus, over my head. Yesterday he published a tweet that referenced ADE--Antibody Dependent Enhancement. Critics of the mRNA gene therapy medications have focused on this phenomenon. ADE is a real thing, but the question is whether it has or will occur in human populations in the context of Covid-19. Here's the Wikipedia summary in that regard:
ADE was a concern during late clinical stages of vaccine development against COVID-19.
ADE was observed in animal studies during the development of coronavirus vaccines, but as of 14 December 2020 no incidents had been observed in human trials. "Overall, while ADE is a theoretical possibility with a COVID-19 vaccine, clinical trials in people so far have not shown that participants who received the vaccine have a higher rate of severe illness compared to participants who did not receive the vaccine."
Thus, the question, as a practical matter, becomes: Are we out of the ADE woods or does it remain a possibility. Highly reputable scientists insist that it does remain a possibility, but I'm not aware that any of the scariants are part of that phenomenon. Or, not yet.
In this regard, here is Malone's tweet on the subject. To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what he's saying. See what you think. This lack of information and of transparency is a huge part of the problem we face. It seems to me that authorities whose job it is to push information out and to inform the public--a theme that Malone emphasizes continuously--have been and remain determined to hide the ball from the people most concerned.
This is a "self own" that vaccine durability is poor. It is during the waning phase of vaccine-induced immune response that the risk of ADE is highest. Evidence? you say? See Dengue vaccine development, ADE, and the risk associated with waning immunity. QED. https://t.co/g31vgRyZdm— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) July 19, 2021
I'll paste that in in text format:
This is a "self own" that vaccine durability is poor. It is during the waning phase of vaccine-induced immune response that the risk of ADE is highest. Evidence? you say? See Dengue vaccine development, ADE, and the risk associated with waning immunity. QED.
Does this relate to what we're seeing with regard to so many vaxxed people turning up with the Dread Delta scariant? I don't know. I'd like to see more on this subject.
ADDENDUM: There's a thoughtful article at AmThinker today--COVID Authoritarianism Has Changed Our Polity. I'll quote an excerpt from the end that raises the issue that has so many thinking people concerned. It's clear that the Covid regime has, at this point, virtually nothing to do with public health. It's become a new cult of sorts, one that is supposed to lead to some sort of Brave New World. A global transformation or, if you will, a Great Reset:
If the government can force vaccination for what is, to you, an incredibly unthreatening risk, what can’t the government do?
We’re outside the realm of government policy based upon the “collective good,” and have reached the realm of government policy based upon what the government believes is “for your own good.”
If we accept that the government should be in the business of coercing Americans to accept the physical injection of an experimental vaccine, which carries unknown risks, to inoculate them against a virus that represents an infinitesimal risk of serious harm or death to the vast majority of healthy Americans, why shouldn’t the government be in the business of telling us what shouldn’t be introduced to our bodies, given new scientific evidence?
The government is already working with social media companies to determine what we should and shouldn’t read, as Jen Psaki reminds us. Why shouldn’t the government also tell us how much we can eat, drink, smoke, work, or exercise? After all, the constantly evolving and often wrong “science” says that there’s an optimal level for all of those things. Why shouldn’t we be made to “follow the science” by our government betters, for our own good?
Make no mistake, the COVID pandemic, with the media and technology infrastructure that was in place in 2020, is an authoritarian’s dream.
The reference to 'often wrong "science"' brings to mind what a government adviser in England openly admitted:
“But now it is entrenched, and we are entrenching bad behaviour.”
Entrenching bad behavior? Or is it, entrenching blindly compliant behavior? We know that next to none of the current regime is about the science, and we also know that a main object has always been to conceal the truth--Wuhan, anyone? So it's natural to ask: What really is it about?