Pages

Tuesday, June 8, 2021

Briefly Noted: In Vax News

This is interesting. Please note that Senator Paul is incorrect. It is NOT true that there was no difference in the reinfection rates for those who were vaxxed and those who were non-vaxxed-but-previously-infected. We'll quote from the study below. The significance of this study--in part--is that it really does establish that naturally acquired immunity is preferable to vax acquired immunity. Moreover, if we're to believe top epidemiologists, there are many, many millions of people who fall into the "previously infected" category.



Now, first we look at the results of the study in a graph. Please note that, despite the dramatic looking lines, the actual real world incidence of Covid infection in the study group was extremely low. Feed into that the reality of extremely low mortality rates for working age people, if you're inclined to wonder what this means for overall risk assessment. Nothing changes from what we already know. Also feed into that what we know--but which the medical establishment is still trying to hide from us--about highly effective and inexpensive medications for treating Covid.




But also note that, while the bottom two lines are extremely close, they are not identical. I quote here from the linked article:


Specifically,

of all infections during the study period, 99.3% occurred in participants who were not infected previously and remained unvaccinated.

In contrast,

only 0.7% of infections occurred in participants who were not previously infected but were currently vaccinated.

Importantly,

not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.


Here's the bottom line: If you have had an encounter with Covid in the past--and we know that's not the only way to acquire natural immunity--YOU WILL NOT BE REINFECTED. 

Never say never in these situations, right? But the chances definitely verge on no chance at all.

Well, isn't that 0.7% infection for the vaxxed population rate pretty good? That depends. In a population as large as that of the US, that reinfection rate actually adds up to quite a few people. Certainly millions. The study, unfortunately, doesn't mention two matters of absorbing interest. First, it doesn't mention what the outcomes were for those in the 0.7% who were infected after being vaxxed--nor does it mention side effects, for that matter. Second, it doesn't tell us whether any effort was made in examining that 0.7% to distinguish Covid as naturally occurring ("breakthrough infection") from the possibility that what looked like Covid was actually caused by the vaccine, through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

Here's the bottom line, in my opinion. It's a legal bottom line. Anyone who has been previously infected simply should not be participating in a medical experiment of this sort. There's no reason for them to do so, and there are very definite risks, up to and including death--as the databases of side effects in both the US and Europe confirm. These vaccines are many times more dangerous than previous vaccines. This is true for all four vaccines. For those who are resisting the efforts to force them to participate in a medical experiment, this is powerful evidence that blanket mandates are utterly unwarranted from a sound scientific standpoint. There are ways to distinguish risk factors, and no one should be forced to participate in an experiment like this.


10 comments:

  1. my wife is scheduled to get a J&J Jab on Thursday after putting it off for months. I got mine in April and it seems to have done me no harm...time will tell, I suppose. I'm a decade older (70) than her so her response may be a bit more "robust" than mine (which was zilch) since she's a woman and younger, but I will be holding my breath until it's over...will know if it was the right move after the fact, sigh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why don't you get her to not take it but instead order ivermectin from here : https://ivermectin24h.com/
      It's legit, no prescription needed. The pills are about $5 each. I've bought from them twice; it ships from India so it takes about 2 weeks to get it. Someone will call you after you place an order to make sure. I got a call from britain :-) Right now I have 30 ivermectin 12 mg and 30 HCQ 200 mg.

      Delete
    2. I should have added you can get ivermectin and HCQ from the frontline doctors website also. It's just more expensive

      Delete
    3. I hear ya, but she wants to be able to go places without wearing a mask (she's an honest person and won't lie about her status)...having ivermectin handy won't cut it I'm afraid, sigh. Plus, she wants to head to Europe this fall for the christening of our nephew's first child and I guarantee the EU won't allow her in without some sort of vaccine guarantee and there's the rub. No good answers, just pray she doesn't have much of a reaction to J&J...no way we were going with the double-shot approach.

      Check back with me in 20 years and I'll let ya know how it turned out

      Delete
  2. "...no one who is not at risk should be forced to participate in an experiment like this."

    Disagree ... there are no conditions where anyone should be "forced to participate."

    This should be entirely voluntary.

    -Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the correction, Chuck. I spoke/wrote loosely.

      Delete
  3. wow - teenagers, who should have a stronger immune system

    Emerald Robinson:

    "According to the latest CDC data, there were 40 reports of heart inflammation & 16 cases of blood clotting disorders among 12- to 17-year-olds taking the experimental vaccines."

    https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1402656685227925515

    Frank

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is exactly what people like Bhakdi have been talking about. What's happening is a hyper immune reaction, which is what the vax is designed to do.

      Delete
  4. I am not getting any shot. I will not lie because anyone who asks me whether I have been “vaccinated” will get no response other than “Why do you ask?”

    I have no intention of giving up my freedom and privacy to go anywhere and under HIPAA no one has a legal right to ask me to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I post occasionally here and can vouch for one website where I have purchased both 12 mg ivermectin and 200 mg HCQ. Here :
    www.buyivermectinforhumans.us
    It does take 2-3 weeks as it comes from India. No prescription needed

    ReplyDelete