Prosecutors (Van Grack) knowingly sought to induce false statements from Flynn relating to his FARA registration. pic.twitter.com/TU9rMMOWCo— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) January 15, 2020
Van Grack demanded "false testimony from Mr. Flynn about the alleged 'false statements' in the FARA filing - despite Flynn explaining how he learned things in "hindsight" in June 2018— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) January 15, 2020
cc @KerriKupecDOJ pic.twitter.com/9kYrGTy1CC
"The govt's tactics in relation for Mr. Flynn's refusal to 'compose' for the prosecution is a due process violation that can and should be stopped dead in its tracks by this Court" pic.twitter.com/ttcFGmyPv7— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) January 15, 2020
The first new thing Nunes mentions is the role of former DOJ NSD (National Security Division) head Mary McCord, who was front and center in the pursuit and framing of Michael Flynn. Lately we've learned--and Nunes says that he too has learned this only recently--that along with IC IG Atkinson, a former colleague at DoJ, McCord has been working for Adam Schiff in framing the entire "whistleblower" Impeachment Theater narrative.
Sundance sees Ingraham as hurrying Nunes past the McCord story:
Do Laura Ingraham and Mary McCord have a history together in/around Washington DC schools, law firms, clerks, social circles etc?
Because obviously Ingraham doesn’t want Devin Nunes to discuss the revelations about former DOJ-NSD head Mary McCord now working with Adam Schiff on the impeachment agenda. WATCH [@02:50]
Then again, it could be her typical Hannitus Interruptus style of self-important talking that destroys the opportunity for decent information. :::Sigh:::
You be the judge. There's no doubt that I, for one, would have preferred that Ingraham not interrupt and change topics at that point. We understand that she wants to get into the Lev Parnas story, but in the big scheme McCord is undoubtedly more important than Parnas. Parnas is a puppet, but McCord is a puppeteer throughout the whole story of the "Resistance."
Nevertheless, keep listening, because as Nunes and Ingraham move on to the Michael Flynn case Nunes flatly states, several times in varying but consistent ways: "The FBI briefed us that Flynn didn't lie." He also states the obvious: that fact makes Nunes and the others who constitute "us" witnesses on behalf of Flynn. Because Nunes certainly has specific names in mind behind "The FBI". "The FBI" doesn't speak--only specific officials of the FBI can do that, and both Nunes "The FBI" (in the sense of specific individuals) can be brought before the Flynn court. But you do have to ask, Why hasn't "The FBI" done something to clear Flynn already? "Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity"? I mean, huh?
Listen to the whole thing--it's all interesting, as Nunes continues to speak more openly than in the past--Devin Nunes: We Were Told in Early 2017 by Highest Levels of DOJ that Flynn Didn't Lie to the FBI: