Friday, September 27, 2019

Obama's Role And Motive

Don Surber has a new blog up that's fascinating: Obama is behind impeachment. As it happens, just yesterday I was asking myself, as Joe Biden might say, Son of a gun! Where's Obama these days? Surber explains. In Surber's blog, as you'll see, he also quotes Rush Limbaugh at some length--and the focus is on Crowdstrike. Rush sums that angle up admirably. 

Normally I'd summarize a lot of this, but it's an excellent read, so I'm quoting it at length. The explanation for Dem hatred for Giuliani is worth it, alone. But read it all:

Leon Wagener reported in the Daily Mail on March 1, 2017, "Barack Obama is turning his new home in the posh Kalorama section of the nation's capital - just two miles away from the White House -- into the nerve center of the mounting insurgency against his successor, President Donald J. Trump. 
"Obama's goal, according to a close family friend, is to oust Trump from the presidency either by forcing his resignation or through his impeachment. 
"And Obama is being aided in his political crusade by his longtime consigliere, Valerie Jarrett, who has moved into the 8,200-square-foot, $5.3-million Kaloroma mansion with  the former president and Michelle Obama, long time best friends.
"Jarrett played a vital -- if at times low-key -- role in the Obama presidency. She lived in the White House, dined with the Obamas, and help shape his domestic and foreign policies." 
Under Obama, the Democrat Party has become a Racketeer Influence Corrupt Organization. Maybe it always was. 
President Trump may be their Rudy Giuliani, the man who brought down both Marc Rich (a major Democrat donor who sold Iranian oil despite an embargo) and the Genovese and Colombo crime families. Never forget that Rich (pardoned by Clinton for a million bucks) and defeating the Mob are the reasons Democrats hate him. 
Rush Limbaugh said, "Oh! By the way, if I’ve had one, I have had five emails, 'Hey, Rush, hey, Rush, I see people talking about CrowdStrike all over the media now. Congratulations. Thank you.' I was happy to see that myself because Trump mentioning CrowdStrike in that phone call with the Ukrainian president, let me tell you something. You don’t know this. You’re not gonna see this represented, you’re not gonna see the media, the Democrats, react to it. They’re gonna ignore it. 
"But Trump mentioning CrowdStrike, that’s the firm that examined the DNC server after it was hacked in 2015, everybody thinking that the Russians did it. The FBI never examined it. We don’t know who hacked the server. We don’t know that there was a hack. We don’t know that it wasn’t an inside job to release some of the data on that Democrat National Committee server, whoever tried to hack the RNC computers. But they never got into theirs, but the DNC was hacked."
CrowdStrike is owned by Google, which is evil. 
Limbaugh said, "When Trump mentioned CrowdStrike to the Ukrainian president — do not doubt me — what he was really asking, because he specified the business of Biden and his son, he’s really asking the president of Ukraine to help Barr in the investigation of when the Trump-Russia collusion investigation actually began. That’s what Trump wants to know. That’s what Barr is trying to find out." 
These are the details of Obama's attack on Donald John Trump. Ego alone (as large as it is) no longer is his motivation. Self-preservation is. There are truths that as president, Donald Trump has access to. 
The media seems to be ignorant if this. When he tweeted Obama wiretapped him, the media said "without evidence." As if. 
Obama wants to reverse the 2016 election by any means necessary. This week he decided to roll with impeachment. His post-presidential sedition is unprecedented and unAmerican. 
Hillary merely refuses to accept defeat. 
Pelosi wanders the House aimlessly. 
Obama seeks to undermine the presidency and the nation herself. 
And so we have this constant turmoil, this political drama, and this constant talk of impeachment. His true believers are worn out because Obama overlooked Rule 8 of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals: 
"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." 
When it comes, impeachment will be Obamacare II. 
Democrats will pay the price at the polls.


  1. Well, Obama is behind impeachment the same way Obama was behind the Russia hoax. Obama authorized (even complicitly) his administration to investigate the opposing party's presidential candidate and campaign--based on no evidence, no predicate--but rather because Orange Man Bad.

    If I were Obama, I'd want to be as far away from this as possible. Plan A (Hillary's election) didn't work. Plan B (insurance policy) didn't work. Plan C (Mueller) didn't work. Plan D (impeachment) is going to work?

    What's the definition of insanity...

    1. We know what Trump's plan is--have Bill Barr lead the legal charge. I like that plan. I think the Dem impeachment charge will be like Pickett's charge. Not Barr's. As I keep saying, Dems have a visceral fear of Barr, and they're right to have such a fear. In my belief they're between a rock and a hard place.

  2. Re Crowdstrike

    Since it is apparent to all (I hope) that we're done with Queensbury niceties, I sure hope Durham is talking to Assange. Assange knows from whom he got the DNC emails so wondering who Crowdstrike is and what they did could well be academic.

    I don't know where Trump ultimately comes out on Assange (who assuredly helped him get elected) but he needs to drop any remaining compunctions and simply get to the truth. If that means a deal with Assange, isn't that what Trump is all about?

  3. Forbes wrote "Obama is behind..."

    I agree. This has to go all the way up to what I've been calling the 'lizard brain'. I have been having an internal debate with myself for months now whether the ultimate evil is Obama, Hillary Clinton, or Bill Clinton. (To use a Sherlock Holmes analogy, who is Moriarty?)

    I'm sure there is enough complicity to go around for all three, so maybe it doesn't matter. Perhaps the intersection of all three was a 'perfect storm'.

    But given the power Obama held in 2016 he may well be the proximate cause.

    1. My premise is simply the directors of FBI and CIA operate with the authority and direction of the president. Strzok texted Lisa Page early on that "this" was being run out of the WH. Susan Rice wrote her CYA memo (1/20/17) saying Obama wanted 'everything done by the book.'

      There's more, obviously, but enough evidence from disparate persons to indicate Obama as responsible, i.e. ultimately he green lights--or red lights--anything that happens under his executive authorities.