Pages

Thursday, October 22, 2020

MAJOR UPDATES: Email Reveals Joe Biden Would Get Cut Of China Deal

The NYPost's latest email revelation regarding the Biden Crime Family makes it explicit that "the Big Guy" had a 10% share in a prospective deal with a shady Chinese energy company CEFC. The Biden involved company was later named Sinohawk and its CEO, Tony Bobulinski, has confirmed the authenticity of the email. Actually, he's gone a lot further than that. While the email itself doesn't make explicity whether the deal actually was consummated, a statement by Bobulinski seems to indicate that it was, while also indicating his perception of the motives behind CEFC's activities:


I realized the Chinese were not really focused on a healthy financial [return on investment].  They were looking at this as a political or influence investment. Once I realized that Hunter wanted to use the company as his personal piggy bank by just taking money out of it as soon as it came from the Chinese, I took steps to prevent that from happening.

The Johnson Report connected some dots in a way that shocked me — it made me realize the Bidens had gone behind my back and gotten paid millions of dollars by the Chinese, even though they told me they hadn’t and wouldn’t do that to their partners.


You can read all the details (including Bobulinski's full statement) in a more readable format (than the NYPost) at Red State:

 

Joe Biden was the "Big Guy" Getting 10% of the Deal With Chinese Businessman Says Insider Who Was CEO


The Red State author, Shipwreckedcrew, spells out the implications of this. My version: It's not that the deal was per se illegal, but that (as Bobulinski says) there is a very strong appearance that the Bidens--including Joe--were trading on the Chinese expectation of future political influence. If this weren't the case, Biden wouldn't be denying involvement in his son's dealings with foreign governments. These denials are now a clear campaign issue as regards Biden's fitness to hold office--and especially because these false denials appear to open him up to blackmail:


The first thing to notice [about the email] is the date, May 2017, after Joe Biden was out of office.  But what was the Chinese partner paying for if not whatever influence Joe Biden might have?

If Joe Biden had stayed in retirement, this deal would have been between him and the IRS.  But he’s in an election for President in two weeks, he’s denied he had any involvement with any of Hunter Biden’s business activities, and he’s not inappropriately connected to any foreign enterprise.

...

The very immediate implication of this statement is how will Facebook and Twitter respond?  They can no longer block the publication of these documents on their platforms on the basis that they are possibly inauthentic and  part of an influence effort by a hostile foreign government.

The truth about Biden is exactly as some have always said — he and his family took advantage of his political position to enrich themselves by any means necessary with interests hostile to the United States.

Tony Bobulinski now comes forward and says in stark terms that “Yes, Joe Biden has been taking money from the Chinese Communist government.”

Where will the Democrats be tomorrow as a party?  Is the acquisition of power so all-consuming to them that they are ok with this?


Finally, here is a copy of relevant portions of the email:



UPDATE 1: Fox News has obtained an email relevant to the CEFC/Biden deal. The email lists "domestic contacts"--all prominent Dem politicians, including Kamala Harris:

Harris, prominent Democrats listed as 'key contacts' for Biden family business venture projects

Email is unrelated to the laptop or hard drive purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden

EXCLUSIVE: A list of “key domestic contacts” for a joint venture involving Jim and Hunter Biden and now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co. included former Vice President Joe Biden's current running mate Sen. Kamala Harris, among other prominent Democrats, Fox News has learned.

An email exclusively obtained by Fox News, with the subject line “Phase one domestic contacts/ projects” and dated May 15, 2017, Biden’s brother, Jim Biden, shared a list of “key domestic contacts for phase one target projects.”

The email is unrelated to the laptop or hard drive purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden, the former vice president's son.

READ THE EMAIL HERE.

The list, included Harris, D-Calif.; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.; Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.; Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.; New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo; New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio; former Virginia Gov. Terry McCauliffe, among others.

It is unclear if any of the Democrats were ever contacted about the “target projects.”

It's also unclear whether any of this may be under investigation.

ALSO THIS--DON'T MENTION JOE:



UPDATE 2: A glance at the list of Dem politicos gives one the impression that the Chinese may have believed that they were investing in the future of the Dem party, not just for immediate benefit.


16 comments:

  1. The debate tonight, purposely, is going to ignore this and cut Trump off.

    Trump should bring a couple of amps and a mic to counteract this censorship.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. portable bullhorn (with forged AntiFa stickers, for bonus splodey-heads)

      Delete
  2. Yes, at this point, there is no denying the truth- Biden has been lying repeatedly on these issues- literally nothing but lies.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Old news. Trump is a racist. ACB will destroy Obamacare and kill people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also relevant to this thread are text messages from the WhatsApp application with Bobulinski. The text messages make clear to only discuss Jo Biden's involvement face-to-face because the Bidens are paranoid.

    It will be shocking and jarring for Trump to bring this up specifically at the debate tonight. The shock will be due to the media blackout that anyone not following conservative news would know nothing about it.

    These again are not messages on the laptops, but the laptops have let loose other parties to come forward with what they have and their concerns contemporaneous to the time these deals were being done. The fake controversy of the laptop's legitimacy will fade over time as everything else confirms the information was accurate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WhatsApp is also a Facebook application...how much you wanna bet those text exchanges would be stored on Facebook's servers. If the Bidens relied on WhatsApp...rookie mistake

      Delete
  5. So the actual email list potential targets for engagement with the China money. The individuals identified are clearly a who's who in the Dem party (curious Nancy is not part of the club, apparently, despite Newsom, Harris, Feinstein belonging). So far, nothing disclosed about whether anything happened with those targets to hit up. But, we sure do know where to look now, don't we?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They probably already have a conduit to Nancy.

      Delete
  6. A 1974 Washingtonian interview with Kitty Kelley has been recycled. A pretty revealing look into Biden, as he was and still is. Same old self-serving, self-reverential Joe. He thinks he is God’s gift - to women, to the world. The article is linked in this NRO article:

    https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/a-bizarre-and-revealing-biden-interview/

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the Chinese were simply investing their funds with Hunter and his pals for financial investment profit, in what way would that related to contacting this list of Dem politicians?

    It's orthogonal if it were only a financial investment.

    Ergo, the list of Dem pols is the smoking gun that tells you this Chinese investment wasn't about Hunter and his pals investing the money financially -- it was about investing the money POLITICALLY.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I said this yesterday, and I promise I won't repeat myself again, but I can't help thinking that this slow release of documents, each day getting close and closer to Biden, may well have been done with the cooperation of elements in the FBI. If it were the other way around, isn't that the first thing we would have thought? I know I would have. If the FBI had indicted Hunter a year ago, Joe B would have had plenty of time, and, of course, the enthusiastic cooperation of the press, in negating the effects of this scandal. By letting the info percolate until a few weeks before the election, there's no time to neutralize its effects. And the slow trickle building to what I presume will be a good case for Joe's involvement prevents the media from sitting on the story and protecting Joe. As far as I can see, the FBI is remaining silent on this whole matter, sitting back and allowing the information to be released in the manner that Giuliani and whomever else is handling this see fit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Slow trickle aka the Chinese Water Torture or the Death of 1000 Cuts? Take your pick… Keeps The Big Guy & Co off balance

      Delete
  9. Not to beat a dead horse, but if Trump tries to work this topic into the debate tonight over the objections of the interlocutor and/or the format, he will need to be careful. Ranting and berating and going after Joe is going to make him look like the frothing madman MSM makes him out to be. He needs to win this debate.

    Look at the reaction of the despicable NPR to this story. That's everyone on the left. Trump doesn't need to sing to the choir. He is aiming at the unconvinced, the fence-sitters, and maybe a lefty or two, not those of us who have been following the story.

    Let Trump be Trump. I get it. We tend to dismiss the polls. They're bag jobs. But is that what the early voting is telling us?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Notice something intriguing about the CEFC/Biden deal email?

    Notice page 1 is blank?

    I could be wrong, but I think there's another shoe that's going to drop on this email, and it in the blanked-out part of the email. It's the part that would explain what the contact list is for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That list of contacts reveals a wider network - even if they were not contacted, someone thought they would be amenable to the deal. I love the idea of the squirm factor increasing hitting those hypocrites...

      Delete