UPDATED: Briefly Noted: The Great Reset--Mandatory Meds For All?

Links to two articles on the push (!) to inject the entire human race with medications--every year, forever and ever.

Pfizer CEO: ‘Every year you will have to get your annual shot for COVID’

31 reasons why I won’t take a COVID vaccine

I refuse to turn myself into a chronic patient who receives injections of new pharmaceutical products on a regular basis simply to reduce my chances of getting a severe case of a virus that these injections do not even prevent.

Here are a handful of items gleaned from the 31 reasons, but the rest makes for provocative reading as well:

1. It's not a vaccine. A vaccine by definition provides immunity to a disease. This does not provide immunity to anything. In a best-case scenario, it merely reduces the chance of getting a severe case of a virus if one catches it. Hence, it is a medical treatment, not a vaccine. I do not want to take a medical treatment for an illness I do not have.

9. The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. This is a preposterous excuse, and it takes an unbelievable amount of chutzpah to even say such a thing. Such a “line” is a figment of their own imagination; if they hogged a couple of injections for themselves no one would cry foul. In addition, billionaires with private jets and private islands are not known for waiting in line until hundreds of millions of peasants all over the world go first to receive anything these billionaires want for themselves.

11. Three facts that must be put together:

Bill Gates is touting these vaccines as essential to the survival of the human race.

Bill Gates believes the world has too many people and needs to be “depopulated”.

Bill Gates, perhaps the richest man in the world, has also not been injected. No rush.

Uh, no. I'll pass on any medical treatments he wants me to take.

16. This is the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race.

17. It is purposely not being portrayed as the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race, and the fact that it is a medical experiment at all is being severely downplayed.

Food for thought?

UPDATE: You might wonder how a story about teachers union hypocrisy is related to a post about vaxxing. It's simply this: One would expect that the head of teachers union would have received The Memo--the one that explained the big picture of the Covid Hoax. Presumably that would explain how he knows that his little daughter is at no risk, nor are the teachers at her private school:

ANOTHER LEFTIST HYPOCRITE: Berkeley Teachers Union President Who Demands Schools Remain Closed Is Seen Dropping His Kid Off at in-Person Preschool

Installing totalitarianism with a convenient app

That's the come-on to an article at American Thinker this morning that everyone should read:

Crossing the Digital Rubicon

As you'll see, the article touches on themes we've been discussing with regard to Nicolle Wallaces's characterization of all who question Election 2020 and the Covid Regime as "domestic terrorists." As we noted this morning, by implication the Senate Dems are now applying that standard to Senators Hawley and Cruz. Wallace's, of course, is only one of many voices advancing these totalitarian notions for purging dissent from our public square. Who can imagine that's the end of it all, especially with what we've seen of the new ruthlessness of the Big Tech companies?

The digital Rubicon has, of course, already been crossed. The author, concentrating on the ubiquity of cell phones and especially of 'smart' phones, urges us to consider whether, in exchange for "handheld convenience", we have exchanged much of our personal lives, including "personal details, even intimate psychological profiles", for exploitation and coercion by our woke ruling Oligarchs.

Here's a brief excerpt to give you an idea of the scope of the issues:

Democracy For Me But Not For Thee

That's the Dem's new coordinated ploy--Trump supporters are "endangering our Democracy." Of course, it's just another hoax--as several commenters here pointed out in the wake of the January 6 event at the Capitol. The same mantra of concern for the sacred space of the people and their reps only applied to non-Dem protestors. Among various incidents of excused Dem rioting in capitol buildings, the 2011 storming of the Wisconsin state capitol was particularly violent, but was widely and openly embraced by the Left. Why?Because at that time Scott Walker was the Republican governor of Wisconsin. Walker was a lightening rod for Dem hatred, especially because he was gaining a national following. That meant that anything would go.

Today at Fox News Yael Halon recalls the storming of the Wisconsin capitol. After noting the universal, mandatory condemnation of the January 6 event--the actual nature of which is, upon examination, becoming increasingly murky--Halon notes:

Ten years earlier, unionists stormed the Wisconsin State Capitol in an attempt to block a vote on collective bargaining reform. Thousands of demonstrators managed to enter the building by violently breaking down doors and shattering windows -- but the attack garnered much praise from Pelosi and other prominent Democrats at the time.

The occupiers were praised publically by Pelosi for their "impressive show of democracy in action." The House Speaker took to Twitter to express her "solidarity" with the activists as they attacked the Capitol, and sent senators into hiding until police managed to remove them from the building.  

Just to be sure that her views would be recorded unambiguously for posterity, Pelosi put them in writing, tweeting out:

People Are Noticing ...

And it's still early days. More signs of a rocky road--because people learn about this stuff. They don't trust the 'traditional' media and they know where to look for real news. Three very complementary views:

Irony so rich that you could serve it as dessert. https://t.co/R8eq3n9MtO

— Emerald Robinson ✝️ (@EmeraldRobinson) January 23, 2021

I guess mail-in voting is no longer “safe and secure” now that it might be used to gore the ox of a left-wing Big Tech oligarch. https://t.co/dWtLREWhjk

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 23, 2021

But good enough to elect a president, because everyone knows at this point political power is subservient to Big Tech power. Also loooooooool. https://t.co/GEKuEsi4Tl

— Inez Stepman ⚪️🔴⚪️ (@InezFeltscher) January 23, 2021

Stepman says it well. We know now who Rules America, and it isn't the people who are making believe. It's our Big Brother--Big Tech, with a little help from their friends in the Deep State. Problem is, the Rulers--being business guys looking to maximize their bucks no matter what their ideology--can't really hide what's going on. Wiping the WH web page and maintaining a military occupation of the Imperial City on the Potomac won't stop the subjects from figuring it all out. It's just not that complicated.

Dem Message To Peon America: Learn To Code!

Already. Really. This is the plan. You work for the Oligarchy. Learn to luv Big Brother:

On ABC, Rahm Emanuel literally says a Biden White House should tell people laid off from retail stores like JC Penney to learn to code.

He actually said this. Amazing. pic.twitter.com/xlSnVi7445

— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) November 7, 2020

David Goldman approaches it from a different angle but it all amounts to the same: Big Tech Is 'Policing' You, Says Jeff Bezos' Washington Post. I guess we knew that, right? But they're saying it right up front now. Already. Really. And they mean it:

“Trump’s Early Victory Declarations Test Tech Giant’s Mettle in Policing Threats to the Election.”

No joke — that was the Washington Post’s headline two days ago. I won’t pay Jeff Bezos to read the article, but the headline is astonishing. Big Brother in Silicon Valley is responsible for “policing” the election.

“Big Brother is Watching You” was the meme of George Orwell’s 1984. Today it’s “Big Tech is Policing You.”

And this:

What’s coming next, I have on high authority, is the suppression of “offensive” content on the Internet itself: Google searches won’t turn up content that you aren’t supposed to see.