Pages

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

Hannity: Lisa Page Has Been Fully Cooperative "For A Long Time"

According to Hannity, Lisa Page stated in closed door testimony that after nine months of investigation--starting in July, 2016--the FBI had NOTHING. Yet Rosenstein started up Team Mueller anyway. She is--and has been "for a long time"--cooperating with the investigation.

Think about Lisa Page and her position in the Russia Hoax. We mostly know her as the paramour of Peter Strzok, texting and emailing with him constantly and candidly. But she was McCabe's counsel, she interacted with the whole FBI legal team (including Comey's counsel, Jim Baker), and she also interacted with key DoJ personnel: Sally Yates, David Laufman, Tashina Gauhar, and Andrew Weissmann. She was at the key October meeting with Bruce Ohr, Chris Steele, Weissmann, and Zainab Ahmad--that was shortly before the Carter Page FISA. Her cooperation should be huge. She's a mother with two children--she doesn't want to go to jail and as former prosecutor she knows what that means, what she needs to do.

Hannity concluded with this:

I have my sources confirming to me tonight at very high levels. And by the way, it’s not Trump. I have high level sources telling me tonight, that "by the time that Attorney Durham is done with his job, and the Attorney General is done with his job, and the investigation is complete adding into it Inspector General Horowitz, it will shock the conscience of a nation." That is a quote.

Sounds good to me.



9 comments:

  1. Pretty sure just about nobody outside of D.C. is going to be "shocked". Revelations & Confessions will simply provoke Democrats into escalating their rhetoric of hate - that the DOJ has been compromised by the KGB and Democrats are the only true patriots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I assume that the current escalation is all about trying to somehow establish a balance of evil. People outside DC may not be exactly shocked, but I think they will be outraged. The hope here is that they will tie it all together--people who engage in that rhetoric are the type of don't give a fig for our constitutional order. Criminals, hypocrites. Trump will work that angle.

      Delete
    2. Nobody shocked? Trust me when I tell you there are plenty of NYT-reading Democrats in NYC (7-to-1 registration advantage over Reps) who are certain Trump stole the election with help from Putin--since that is the only story reported in the NYT.

      Delete
  2. I just wanted to mention Dyer's timeline in her latest article at Liberty Unyielding. She refers to the hiring of Fusion by DNC/Clinton lawyers on April 12, 2016. And to the visit of Mueller and Zebley to see Stephanie Osburn, executive director of Obama's Intelligence Advisory Board on April 13. I want to add that on April 10, Glenn Simpson's wife, Mary Jacoby, visited Obama at the White House and stayed at the WH for a reported 14 hours (!), according to the visitor logs. So Obama was definitely in on the hiring of Fusion. No surprise, really, since Perkins Coie was his personal law firm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm afraid most people are bored with all the Hannity-like "revelations" and "bombshells". I know I am. As Dyer writes:

      "The details are indispensable to validate the conclusions, but they’re probably making many readers’ eyes glaze over."

      Delete
    2. Tx very much. I'll check that out. Of course the question is, What did Obama for American hire Fusion to do? Work on the Hillary campaign, or something else? I'll read it.

      Delete
  3. Just noticed, too, on conservapedia.com, that Obama for America paid Perkins Coie $972,000 beginning in April 2016.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is unfortunate that there won't be any pre-dawn SWAT raids on the offices and principals' homesteads of the Perkins Coie crew. (Cohen's raid is only precedent for use against conservatives) I'm sure the resulting evidence would be... interesting. -MR

    ReplyDelete