MAJOR UPDATE: Briefly Noted: Covid Regime Developments?

Some of you may have noticed yesterday that Fauci did another about face--he now is saying we need treatments for Covid. Yes, I understand. This comes only after Big Pharma has been at work on such treatments, which will be big money makers for them. It also comes after countless lives were sacrificed by the decision to virtually ban largely effective--not perfect, but largely effective--repurposed or off label medications.

People like Karl Denninger and many others have been arguing all along: The only sensible epidemiological response to Covid is to forget vaccines and opt for infection and early treatment. You can read an excellent post by KD in which he repeats that position while succinctly comparing the situation with regard to smallpox (and its vaccine) to the Covid Panic here:

Until Now, Of Course

What he's referring to is the fact that the smallpox vaccine was "the most dangerous vaccine." The operative word there is "was", and the details should be eye opening.

As I said, KD concludes with his oft repeated position:

I choose infection (which as I've said all the way back to March of 2020 was inevitable for all of us) and immediate treatment; it is vastly superior, on the data, in protecting me and the odds of that approach failing -- and my being dead as a result -- are less than if I take the jab

Dr. Robert Malone has a brief thread this morning that includes a--perhaps--significant detail:

OK folks- looking forward, what do we need if we have accepted protocols for early outpatient treatment?

1) CDC has to get its act together;

2) We need very active surveillance, tracing, testing; 

3) We need the ability to test (ideally self-test) for SARS-CoV-2 infection; 

4) without the ability to test and verify SARS-CoV-2 infection, we will not be able to efficiently initiate early treatments; 

5) we need an easy test that can be used to monitor immune status. It will probably require ability to assess T cell as well as B (antibody) responses.

This thread is consequent to an hour long phone call this AM with a very senior DoD civilian leader. Please add in your thoughts and advice to this thinking?

See for example: Virtual Town Hall Series - COVID-19 Test Development and Validation.

 

Note that Malone's recommendations appear to have been solicited from "a very senior DoD civilian leader." Now, Malone's are very well known. As such, he should be receiving the leper treatment from such folk in the Zhou regime--unless someone is catching on to the real nature of the problem. I can't think of another reason why someone of that description would reach out to him.

Note, too, that this is coming a year and a half later than it should have.

UPDATE: I don't want to multiply Covid posts, so I'll update this briefer one.

It may be of some significance that, coming on top of developments that cast growing doubt on the entire Covid Regime--an aggressive Leaky Vax Campaign coupled with equally aggressive and unscientific social controls--an increasing number of studies are becoming available, along with data from other countries. All suggest that the Covid Regime as we know it was, at best, ill advised and that a change is urgently needed. For example ...

The Federalist is reporting on a new study that confirms what past studies at very mainstream academic institutions have previously confirmed--as well as what was to be expected from accepted principles of immunology:

Study Finds Greater Antibody Response In Recovered COVID-19 Patients Than Vaccinated Ones

Conducted by a research team at Rockefeller University in New York, ...

... researchers determined that not only do recovered COVID-19 patients possess neutralizing antibodies up to a year after infection, but that such infection simultaneously assists in offering protection against developing variants.

...

The analysis later goes on to conclude, “Memory antibodies selected over time by natural infection have greater potency and breadth than antibodies elicited by vaccination.”

...

The study’s findings add to further mounting evidence detailing the level of protection natural immunity offers previously infected COVID-19 patients. Last month, Emory University published an extensive investigation describing the efficiency of long-term immunity against the respiratory virus. Similar discoveries have also been identified in research released by the Cleveland Clinic and the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, respectively.

Follow the science, anyone? The science is out there, the question is: Who's paying attention? Besides Rand Paul and very few others in our government?

From other countries such as Israel the data is coming in to suggest that there could be major problems down the road--repeat: this warning is data driven, which is what science is supposed to be about. From Israel's Channel 13:

Ran Israeli

@RanIsraeli

"95% of the severe patients are vaccinated".

"85-90% of the hospitalizations are in Fully vaccinated people."

"We are opening more and more COVID wards."

"The effectiveness of the vaccine is waning/fading out"

(Dr. Kobi Haviv, earlier today on Chanel 13 @newsisrael13 )

Dr. Robert Malone comments: "If this holds true and is verified, this is looking more and more like ADE."

Geert Vanden Bossche spells out the implications without mincing words:

(1/5) It’s good to see that other scientists are now increasingly repeating my warning against viral immune escape (@RWMaloneMD, @McCulloughBHVH, @BretWeinstein). Although I’ve already been alerting global health authorities about 6 months ago, 

(2/5) mass vaccination has continued to an extent that viral resistance has now become unavoidable anyway. I am not sure one can reasonably speculate on how viral infectiousness and viral virulence will evolve before we see the consequences of viral resistance to the vaccines. 

(3/5) There is no precedent, indeed, for the effect of fighting a pandemic with vaccinal antibodies that the virus is resistant to (and which will inevitably be recalled by ‘updated’ booster shots, due to ‘antigenic sin’). 

(4/5) Scientifically speaking, it remains difficult to understand how resistance could be accompanied by increased viral infectiousness, as I’ve tried to explain in my most recent Q&A posting. Whether Sars-CoV-2 will persist and evolve into endemicity will ultimately depend on 

(5/5) how viral infectious pressure will eventually compare to the density and immune status of the population. Given the lack of appetite to change the current strategy, it seems like time has come to scale up capacities for early treatment.

Reread that last sentence, in red. Could it be that Fauci's flip flop yesterday re medications and the phone call to Dr. Malone by "a very senior DoD civilian leader" reflect a panicked attempt to switch strategies without admitting the catastrophic mistakes of the initial strategy?