tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post6233312734802441411..comments2023-10-19T21:48:56.560-05:00Comments on meaning in history: UPDATED: Brief Update On The "Whistleblower"mark wauckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-50451554069335130662019-09-20T15:14:20.054-05:002019-09-20T15:14:20.054-05:00I would discount that, only because the media leak...I would discount that, only because the media leaks combined with 3 Congressional "investigations" point to some sort of Dem hit job. But, like the attempted hit on Kavanaugh it's looking pretty inept.mark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-43440065991513506162019-09-20T15:08:48.716-05:002019-09-20T15:08:48.716-05:00It is possible that Trump knows about the leaker a...It is possible that Trump knows about the leaker and decided to kill 2 birds with one stone. Expose the leaker and get rid of Biden.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11656932549374089899noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-26895761240495291092019-09-20T12:12:21.159-05:002019-09-20T12:12:21.159-05:00It seems to me that if some faction of Dems wanted...It seems to me that if some faction of Dems wanted Biden out of the way--Obama strongly urged him to stay out--this could lead to internecine warfare among Dem factions. "Moderates" would probably not take kindly to being handed an extreme Lefty on a take him/her or leave it basis. That looks like the practical effect. Who benefits from this focus on Biden? I'd hafta assume Warren.mark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-52514161203713475482019-09-20T12:09:27.738-05:002019-09-20T12:09:27.738-05:00It's somewhat puzzling.It's somewhat puzzling.mark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-65070026558473788652019-09-20T11:51:18.567-05:002019-09-20T11:51:18.567-05:00It's possible this is a shot to end Biden by h...It's possible this is a shot to end Biden by his opponents in the Democratic Party, with a side shot at Trump.Yancey Wardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16427042729449397357noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-4291364066125624372019-09-20T11:43:57.809-05:002019-09-20T11:43:57.809-05:00This is not the reporting that any Dem was hoping ...This is not the reporting that any Dem was hoping for:<br />https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-whistleblower-drama-puts-biden-hot-seat-over-ukraine<br /><br />The Dems keep firing torpedoes in the water that circle back on them.Forbeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08397667344368400622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-85237531220660288612019-09-20T11:36:50.016-05:002019-09-20T11:36:50.016-05:00Yes, possible. I saw some blogging bringing out th...Yes, possible. I saw some blogging bringing out the Giuliani angle. But, as I said, the fact remains that Trump is president. Congressional investigations will go no where. But Biden will go away. <br /><br />Still you have to wonder, is there really a point in sabotaging Biden like this, as I suggested? My impression is that he wouldn't get far anyway, with all his absurd gaffes.mark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-61885413714771152112019-09-20T11:12:39.243-05:002019-09-20T11:12:39.243-05:00I am guessing, the way the story is being narrated...I am guessing, the way the story is being narrated by the media-i.e. writing "<i>involving</i> Trump", that the allegation itself is about Giuliani's public and private conversations on the matter, and doesn not involve an actual phone conversation between Trump and a Ukranian president.<br /><br />If there really were such a phone conversation, the transcript itself would have beenYancey Wardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16427042729449397357noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-55726108057588251852019-09-20T11:03:42.940-05:002019-09-20T11:03:42.940-05:00Who would profit more, Trump or one of the dozen d...Who would profit more, Trump or one of the dozen dwarves? Honor among thieves indeed.<br />Tom S.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-59647451778058467472019-09-20T10:27:33.533-05:002019-09-20T10:27:33.533-05:00Or how about this? The "whistleblower"--...Or how about this? The "whistleblower"--concerned with others about Biden's likely implosion against Trump--<i>intentionally</i> destroyed Biden's campaign, with the approval of Dem party insiders. Of course they'll also try to make hay out of this against Trump, but the primary target would have been Biden.mark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-5426047283472045102019-09-20T09:29:33.983-05:002019-09-20T09:29:33.983-05:00Mudd foresaw immediately that this whistle-blower ...Mudd foresaw immediately that this whistle-blower has unintentionally destroyed Joe Biden's election campaign. Now the mass media -- even CNN -- will have to report about the Biden family's corruption in Ukraine. <br /><br />Mudd is angry about that -- not about President Trump's prerogatives.<br /><br />-----<br /><br />I wonder if Trump himself deliberately provoked this Mike Sylwesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09987402330015664312noreply@blogger.com