tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post3116310957607033515..comments2023-10-19T21:48:56.560-05:00Comments on meaning in history: Briefly Noted: DiGenova And Toensing Worked With Giuliani On Ukrainemark wauckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-64365234129368526702019-09-29T16:21:57.635-05:002019-09-29T16:21:57.635-05:00Yeah, Barr's handling of Team Mueller was an e...Yeah, Barr's handling of Team Mueller was an eye opener and shot across their bow.mark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-20515438527714829972019-09-29T15:46:24.940-05:002019-09-29T15:46:24.940-05:00I'm guessing Dems didn't expect Wiliam fri...I'm guessing Dems didn't expect Wiliam frickin Barr to be able to shut down Mueller so fast and so completely. They probably believed the Mueller legend and threw up when they saw the Mueller reality. Now it's Barr-Giuliani-Powell-Nunes versus the Democrat Swamp. I like those odds.Deplorable Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04720288972263783908noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-64937247451559820042019-09-29T13:48:19.684-05:002019-09-29T13:48:19.684-05:00I think they want to deny him the right, as POTUS,...I think they want to deny him the right, as POTUS, to an AG, as well. I'm only slightly joking.<br /><br />Speaking of which, I've always been puzzled that they didn't go nuclear during Barr's confirmation. I'll bet right now they'd be happy to guarantee Kavanaugh a long life on the SCOTUS in exchange for forcing Barr out.mark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-19372738782697854212019-09-29T13:33:17.233-05:002019-09-29T13:33:17.233-05:00"hey, I'm Trump's defense attorney&qu..."hey, I'm Trump's defense attorney"<br /><br />Of course. <br /><br />And its 'interesting' that the Dems would not only deny Trump the freedom to investigate what happened to him from 2016 onwards, but would (I don't think I'm exaggerating) deny him the right to counsel. As in, Giuliani (a mere private lawyer) has no right to look into the matters he is looking Cassandernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-8215570284392711762019-09-29T13:02:45.297-05:002019-09-29T13:02:45.297-05:00Yeah, I saw that, but it probably depends a bit on...Yeah, I saw that, but it probably depends a bit on what "working with" means. A bit like the meaning of "is".<br /><br />Re Giuliani, I've heard him say that, hey, I'm Trump's defense attorney, and that means he's proactively researching everything that could be relevant to his defense. And since this would be a political trial, the sky would quite legitimatelymark wauckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08247066866195200890noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1608697421187043479.post-65785235456168194432019-09-29T12:50:01.051-05:002019-09-29T12:50:01.051-05:00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs63RmN-N2k
If I ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs63RmN-N2k<br /><br />If I heard correctly, Giuliani denied working with DiGenova and Toensing on Bartiromo this morning. I'm kind of inclined to believe Giuliani. Trump seems to have formally engaged Giuliani as his lawyer. I have not heard that DiGenova and Toensing have been so engaged.<br /><br />The interview with Giuliani is interesting for a number of Cassandernoreply@blogger.com