Pages

Thursday, November 19, 2020

UPDATED: Confirmation Of The Dominion 'Raid'?

H/T Cassander

I just watched and transcribed an interview that appeared on Newsmax, with Shaun Kraisman interviewing a member of the Trump Recount Committee, Brian Trascher. Trascher specifically states that the Dominion servers in Germany have been seized and that "we" are starting to see some of the raw election data from those servers--data that confirms what Sidney Powell and others have been saying.

Some observations:


It's significant that a real person with a name and an official position in the Trump organization is making this statement. That removes this from the realm of rumor.

Trascher offers one example of fraud--vote switching. There are other types of fraud that could be involved that have already been mentioned by others, such as proportional distribution of votes. Many types of fraud are possible using the Dominion/Smartmatic software.

I continue to believe that, for data of this sort to be seized in Germany and returned to the US and then shared with a campaign, the legal arm of the US government had to have been involved. That means DoJ. No doubt the data will also be made available--or more likely than not, has already been made available-- to the Biden campaign.

For all of you who are frustrated that Bill Barr hasn't called you or emailed you with this information, I feel your pain. He hasn't communicated with me, either. Nevertheless, I can't see any other way that this went down. There may be other federal agencies involved, but in legal dealings with a foreign government and for purposes of maintaining a proper chain of custody, I have to believe that DoJ was involved.

Since we're talking about election fraud, and the recovery of data that is evidence of that fraud, there must be a criminal investigation underway at the same time that the data is being shared with the campaigns.

 

First the transcript, then the video:


BRIAN: Yeah, Sean. And that's just one of many examples that was found throughout all these so-called 'swing' states that were close in the election count. But Amanda nailed it, just now outlining the irregularities and potential fraud we've seen--done MANUALLY, by human beings. But now that we've seized the servers for Dominion that were over in Germany, we're starting to get some raw data offa that. I know you guys have a huge audience now, Sean, and congratulations for that. But I want everybody to listen to me: The things that are gonna come out are gonna shake the Globalists to their very core. And when President Trump is declared the winner of this election, what you saw last weekend in the streets--Trump supporters getting attacked in DC--that's nothing. These people are coming for every city and every suburb, so be prepared because this is happening. You need to protect yourself.

SHAUN: You said 'Things are going to come out.' What things?

BRIAN: Well, like I said. The servers that were seized in Germany--first of all, why are American election ballots being counted overseas? That's a question I've yet to get to the bottom of. Some of the raw data coming offa this is showing clear examples of how votes were actually switched by an algorithm in the software. It was distributed for every single votes that go one way for one candidate they automatically add votes [garbled: to another?]. That's why you saw, even the NYT owned data tracker on election night within 68 seconds President Trump went from being ahead by tens of thousands of votes--I think it was in Wisconsin--to all of a sudden being behind ten thousand votes. In 68 seconds! That's a physical anomaly, it cannot happen. And that happened.

SHAUN: What you're pointing to specifically, you think a bombshell announcement is gonna happen with Dominion voting systems, the software that was used on Dominion specifically. Is that correct?

BRIAN: The fact that Dominion and Smartmatic have become household names in America is flipping the Democrats out. You can see them on Twitter, you can see the Media melting down, just absolutely amplifying their false claims that there's no evidence. There's evidence that's being found in courts all over the country, and today is the first time that we're actually going to be appearing in Federal court. All these little suits that got dismissed here and there were all State courts run by Democrat hack judges. So we're about to see the real deal start, and this is going all the way to the Supreme Court, Sean.



UPDATE 1: If you want to take a deep dive into the data driven analysis of election results, TGP has a copy of Russ Ramsland's affidavit regarding election fraud in Michigan. It's 9 pages long. 

I just finished reading it. Highly recommended.

UPDATE 2: I just picked this up from TGP, quoting Sidney Powell from the Trump team press conference today:


Reporter Emerald Robinson: There were reports that a piece of hardware possibly a server was picked up in Germany. Is that true and is it related to this?

Attorney Sidney Powell: That is true. It is somehow related to this. But I do not know if good guys got it or bad guys got it.


But if Brian Trascher is saying that the Trump recount people are starting to see some of that data ...? There was a follow up question, but Powell's response was cut off.



44 comments:

  1. I have to assume that, in order for the SC to even CONSIDER interfering in the election results, the DOJ or some other official entity other than the Trump campaign will have to divulge that there is an active investigation going on and that there is a compelling case there. Clearly there will be no announcement of who is at fault, but I have to believe that the existence of such a shocker will be enough to at least hold off results, or have states refuse to certify.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why do you assume that? The SC intervened in 2000 without any DOJ investigation.

      Delete
    2. And the SC already interfered in 2020, order by Justice Alito with regards to the Pennsylvania absentee ballots reieved after 8pm election day.

      Delete
  2. "the legal arm of the US government had to have been involved."

    Otherwise, without official LE/DOJ handling and chain of custody, essentially worthless in any court.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "But I do not know if good guys got it or bad guys got it."

    Uh...wut?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gen. McInerney on John Fredericks radio said the CIA operated that site... https://youtu.be/OX6IIYy5ibA

      Delete
    2. I'm listening now. Very interesting. McInerney argues that the Trump team will go straight to the SCOTUS.

      Delete
    3. McInerney is also saying that Biden won the critical South Carolina Dem primary by election fraud. No surprise.

      This lines up with my hunch that Biden had to be the Dem candidate. He had much to lose in a Trump win and he was all in in Obamagate. He is also now known to be totally corrupt. He is just as much owned by the Conspirators as he is by the CCP.

      Delete
  4. Perino at Fox is saying Dominion should sue Trump Campaign. Maybe there is a reason they aren't.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sidney claimed at the presser that Dominion people closing offices and scrambling outa town.

      Delete
    2. check out Linn Wood's response to Periono:

      >> https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1329505860322734080 <<

      Delete
    3. Amusing. Yes, in order to sue they'd have to show up at some point.

      Delete
    4. I'm sure "Discovery" is something they really want to avoid more than the ChiCom Croup.
      Tom S.

      Delete
    5. And as Wood said on the John Fredericks show today, he called Kemp et all corrupt and knows they won't sue because Wood can prove the truth of it.

      Delete
    6. Perino is nno brain trust. When some Fox type said that those who were involved in the presser were telling untruths about Dominion, she said (paraphrased) “well, then they should sue”… Context.

      Delete
  5. Maybe someone snitched and/or a culprit has confessed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe the National Security Agency has obtained incriminating information.

      Delete
    2. I was wondering about that today.

      Delete
    3. Maybe the National Security Agency has decided to share incriminating information.

      Delete
    4. NSA thinks Deep State security is national security.

      Delete
  6. I was curious about the statement regarding the simultaneous shutdown(s) election night. The allegation that all the R poll watchers in several states being kicked out at the same time seems to indicate possibly a signal was sent. If so, who sent it? Who received it? When does predication become sufficient to be allow law enforcement to check emails, texts, data bursts to a common phone app like signal, or just plain phone calls to see what triggered the great election work stoppage/time for plan b?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hmm...

    Dana Perino was under Bush as press secretary.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She was brought on when Tony Snow died. She is attractive. She is not the sharpest knife in the drawer...

      Delete
  8. What fantastic NEWS!!!! As of this moment Team Trump is in the driver's seat. All the lying Liberals, DemonRats, RINOS and Never Trumpers can do is screech and scream that this is a hoax. Trump has put them in the corner of trying to prove a negative! I, for one, am celebrating! But i just ordered more MAGAzines for my AR! Forgive the pun. Life is quickly becoming a slippery slope for "Uncle" Joe and all those RATS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don’t forgot the blue-haired feminazis, antifa thugs, BLM rioters, and social justice looters!

      Delete
  9. Numbers don't lie. When you have more votes than registered voters, that's voter fraud. When normally you have 60% to 70% being extremely high voter turn out and here you have 100,200,and in some counties 300% there's huge voter fraud. Those are facts that won't change.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, I noted Powell’s comment about not knowing whether good guys or bad guys had seized the server. Could it be misdirection? Or is she sending a message to Barr to confirm? She was just on Lou Dobbs and was just as opaque. I don’t know how this works, but assume you do, or your legal commenters.

    Aletheia

    ReplyDelete
  11. Isnt there a firewall between the campaign and the government with this server? wouldnt it be improper for trascher to know it was seized and there is raw vote being looked and its not adding up?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point. I think in this case this is data that the campaign has a right to see. It's not proprietary, but is essentially public--even though it's being collected by a private company. That would be why DoJ could let them see it. My thinking.

      Delete
  12. Violence has been predicted, but to my mind, it's JUST as likely that the bugs will scatter when the light is turned on.

    Nonetheless, I'm being parsimonious with the practice ammo.

    ReplyDelete
  13. All of Powell's claims in her press conference really just go to proving the voting system and platform were designed with voter fraud in mind. The evidence she describes does not established that actual votes were flipped. It certainly rises to the level of requiring a full scale investigation, but I've not yet heard proof that the election was actually stolen by electronic vote flipping.

    I think I have heard enough information to believe there was ballot stuffing and other abuses of mail in votes that could rise to the level sufficient to change election outcomes. But I don't think we have seen proof (yet) of the scale of fraud Powell is alleging, that millions of votes were stolen/fabricated. She might have that sort of proof and cannot disclose it. She continues to double down on her claims. I have no doubt by now that she believes she has this proof. But we all have to wait and see.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep in mind that some of this may depend on the type of remedy they're asking for. It doesn't have to be all or nothing at this stage.

      Delete
  14. Same anon you replied to here...


    Giuliani just gave the best explanation on Hannity that ties it all together. His claim is that the centralized information in Germany was for the purpose of deciding how many ballots needed to be stuffed in Philidelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, etc.

    Now THAT, I can believe. Rudy also says explicitly that they can prove this is precisely what happened. They used the centralized vote tabulation to be able to have a heads up on how many votes they needed to make up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe this relates to McInerny's theory. The data in Germany was a backup to what was going on in the US. It also gave them the capability so that when things didn't work out in as planned they could shut everything down in the US and from Germany rejigger things. All that data should be on the backup server that--we believe--Trump's team is accessing.

      Delete
  15. It would be nice if they would get this information public.

    Tucker went after Powell tonight about this very subject. https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/tucker-carlson-offers-criticism-of-sidney-powell-she-refused-to-provide-any-evidence/

    I have seen a lot of people trashing him but he has a very good point... SHOW ME! That's what I've been saying all along in this.

    I've never known Sidney to BS about anything, but her comment about good or bad guys means she's too far removed from what's happening to see or know. That is worrisome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mean SHOW THE WORLD. I'll wait for them to decide the timing.

      Sidney's statement stunned me.

      Delete
    2. Why would Powell jeopardize any litigation by showing evidence at a news conference?

      Delete
    3. Stunned me, too.

      It occurs to me that they would be engaging in a bit of showmanship during these press conferences. Perhaps she's dangling uncertainty in order to elicit activity from conspirators.

      The alternative is disturbing.

      Delete
    4. So, she is supposed to show TC and the world any & all 'proof' that they have? That is something that, even in discovery, often gives the other side too much time to C.Y.A! Witnesses can be bribed, disappear, killed... this is just too important to risk. Also, even if there were no risks, would anyone in their right mind, even in private, offer information that important to him? Have we forgotten that just weeks ago,he was handed 'proof' "that would bring Hunter Biden,and potentially Joe as well, down. He blamed FedEx for "misplacing" it, and trashes them to the world. When they 'find' it, the whole story gets more suspicious. Firstly, why would he not have info that important, either with him,
      or in a safe, etc? Why would he EVER ask for the entire thing be SENT to him? I would've had a copy in a secret file on my person. Secondly, when they were 'found', he seemed almost disappointed, almost as if the information had been put at risk on purpose. So, imagine my surprise (insert sarcasm), when he then announces that he is "neighbors with HB and I don't want to kick a man when he's down", so I've decided not to reveal the information and to get rid of it". WTH!!?? Am I the only one who found his actions,explication,etc EXTREMELY sketchy!? This was just another thing that The press just gave them a pass on! The whole,"they've had so much tragedy" so let's not hold them accountable thing, just smacks of the very privilege that is the problem. Any 'regular joe' committed a crime, even if they had suffered nothing BUT tragedy, would be arrested, and have to defend their actions! I don't blame SP, I wouldn't trust him any farther than I could throw him!
      As to those battling, it wouldn't be due to their exchange or her not giving proof, but rather that they were already looking for an excuse to do so.

      Delete
    5. Thanks for the TC/HB reminder. I too was dumbfounded by that. It was the 2nd time I'd heard of some TC dodgy personal connections.

      Delete
  16. Even the most conservative blogs are throwing in the towel after Carlson's show. But what bothers me is Traschers claims they were going through servers, vs Powells... WTH? Dave

    ReplyDelete
  17. Sidney Powell on the servers recovered in Germany "There were lines into the servers from FOUR foreign countries."

    https://twitter.com/SaraThatcherCA/status/1329835399695446018?s=20

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. That seems like confirmation.

      Delete
    2. That's a *very* detailed bit of info. Either Sydney's a great bluffer--trying to get the conspirators to panic and make yet another mistake--or else a computer server really was seized in Germany. Of course this won't matter if corrupt judges keep delaying until Dec 14th.

      Delete